Actually it is not.
4 year cycle is not about this pattern where we go up 3 years and 1 year down.
It is measured (or should be) from low to low because it is most accurate and proven way.
Which means it technically can bottom out again after 4 years, leaving 4y cycle intact.
It is more complex than everyone's thinking
@A2E_A2E@TheRealPlanC Cycles are bottom to bottom, we can rally all the way to September next year and crash 90% in a month and it would still be a 4 year cycle. I’m not saying the top isn’t in but another higher high would not break the 4 year cycle
@AltcoinMonke@ChartingGuy Not really, so many shorts with huge leverage, dead cat bounce first ( and one big enough to get everyone to say we’re so back) then down to 50k
@goemer_md@MylesGinvest Cycle theory is low to low not low to high so we can rally again and put in a new ath then go down for the 4 year cycle low and it would be valid… not saying that’s what going to happen but Oct 6th not being the cycle high is fine
@eviljunglelord@AshCrypto I don’t get this argument there is like 10 times the amount of 100x leveraged shorts righ now but the market makers don’t want that liquidity?
@Frogfomocoin@JamesWynnReal When everyone turns bearish, the market sets the perfect trap. Shorts euphoria comes before the fall- that’s when the bear becomes the bait… it was a bear trap