@JohnEDeaton1@SECGov Another idea is that maybe it is because Ripple will stop the $ being used as the Cross border payment system. That alone will cost the USA $MILLIONS per year.
ETH will never be used for cross border payments
@BCBacker Sad to see how many people fail to read everything BCB says before replying... Look for the words... " retrace.... Alts run..... Continue to run.... BTC bear market", The BCB is someone I wish I had known about last year. He knows how to research well and deserves his riches..
@cz_binance@elonmusk@binance#DOGEorTesla#Binance Ha ha, its a no brained for me, as much as I'd love a Tesla, I'm nearly blind.. That doesn't worry me, I'm happy to drive but it's everyone else that screams and runs away terrified ha ha... So,
IT'S DOGE for me and thanks for the chance..
@BCBacker BCB, mate, don't let the know it all get to you. You know your stuff and are ki d enough to share it.. Sadly, that usually means the idiots jump on and try to lessen their stupidity by pretending to be clever by knocking a man who knows more than them.. You carry on.
@attorneyjeremy1@BCBacker BC Backer is superb, the lawsuit is dragging on as International transfers used the doller as the intermediary currency, and the banks earnt of every transaction, Ripple will cost them billions. They dont like the idea of the public earning it and not them... Simple
@BCBacker Am with you 100% but based on simple trend lines ancorhed in 2011 and 2013 and extended... So, again, agree fully with this all being one long cycle. I get a top in late Dec of approx 82k but subject to a tolerance of abut 5k for inaccuracy on such long trebdlines
@100trillionUSD Thanks for all your info here. As a relative newbie, I am learning fast with this sort of thing. But I have to ask, at what point is this S2F chart 100K - 30k targets invalidated, if at all? When it drops below that Arc?
@attorneyjeremy1 I am interested to know if, on the grounds of so many SEC errors, the judge could actually just throw the case out of court without settlement or judgement being made, because of ', No case to answer". And if so, could that allow SEC to try and build another case at a later date?