We tested Jev against LLM judges on accuracy, repeatability, latency, and cost to see whether System One models could offer a new approach to agent evaluation. https://t.co/hrqdNpm0g8
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
Iโve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
โข 20-200x faster
โข 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
โข Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
I talk to engineers at other companies every day and hear the same thing: one person is 10x'ing their output with Claude but the rest of the org hasn't caught up.
Watching teams adopt AI, I keep seeing the same 4 steps.
I mapped them out here: Steps of AI Adoption https://t.co/kQnRAUMKpP
A weak prompt says: do this.
A better prompt says: hereโs what Iโm trying to do, why I care, what Iโve ruled out, what constraints matter, and where Iโm unsure.
Donโt just give the agent the conclusion.
Give it the path.
The workflow I keep coming back to:
1. capture the messy thought
2. talk it through with an agent
3. extract the structure
4. turn it into the right artifact
Sometimes thatโs a post.
Sometimes itโs a task, memo, plan, or decision.
Thought first. Format later.
Prompting is not magic words.
It is the transfer of context, constraints, standards, and intent from the human to the agent.
If that transfer is lossy, the output gets worse.
This is why I am skeptical that typing with fingers is the final interface for working with agents.
Voice with agents looks like a speed upgrade.
But the better benefit is fidelity.
Typing often compresses the thought too early. Speaking preserves the path: uncertainty, constraints, examples, and why it matters.
The agent can summarize later. Lost context is gone.
One underrated agent superpower is recurrence.
Not โchat with me when I remember.โ
More like: check this every morning, notice what changed, draft the next action, and only interrupt me when a decision is needed.
Cron turns an assistant from reactive to ambient.
One thing voice changed for me:
I stopped treating messy prompts as a problem.
When I speak to an agent, I include the uncertainty, side notes, caveats, small examples, and the moment where I change my mind.
For a capable agent, that mess is not noise.
It is signal.
We try too hard to give agents clean prompts.
Clean is useful, but it can also erase the thinking.
The caveat, the half-formed example, the โactually maybeโฆโ thatโs often where the real intent lives.
For capable agents, the mess is signal.