In a lot of media questioning, and a lot of commentary, I'm seeing the suggestion that "people" are confused about the Voice, "people" want detail, the "Yes" side is losing...
But I'm not sure what this is based on other than comments by other media figures?
"You can’t hand out billions of dollars to the Reef with one hand and billions to fossil fuels like gas with the other.
Australia can’t keep subsidising fossil fuel exports while saying we are protecting the Reef."
- Prof David Karoly, Climate Councillor #auspol#budget22
Also a perennial note that reducing demand (via efficiency, electrification and fuel switching as appropriate for different use contexts) is just as relevant as supply to a gas strategy that works for energy users
We need to end native forest logging now.
I am heading to Toolangi State Forest on Sunday to see first hand what Vic Forest is calling regenerated.
I'll be sharing what I see.
https://t.co/QkNeAipI43