Clip and audio from a Massachusetts Families for Vaccines video — these are NOT our words.
They claim Massachusetts schools are “falling behind” on safety.
The facts: Kindergarten MMR vaccination rates have remained very stable for the past decade — consistently in the mid-96% range.
Today’s rate of 96.5% is actually slightly higher than 10 years ago.
While religious exemptions have increased modestly (still under 2%), overall vaccination rates have held strong. Massachusetts continues to have one of the highest childhood vaccination rates in the country.
We are NOT falling behind.
✅ Protect the religious and medical exemptions.
✅ Oppose H.2554.
📧 Send a one-click email in less than one minute:
👉 https://t.co/LWar5enfyk
This goes directly to your State Representative, State Senator, and the House Committee on Ways and Means.
📞 Want to do more? Visit https://t.co/ykkmLnOhqy for talking points, phone scripts & more.
Please share this reel. Every action helps before July 31.
#OpposeH2554 #ProtectReligiousExemption #ReligiousExemption #Massachusetts #HealthActionMA
Watch how a graph with a truncated y-axis is being used by supporters of removing the religious exemption.
At first glance it looks like a big increase. In reality, Massachusetts religious exemption rates have remained consistently low — around 1% for 15 years — in a state with one of the highest childhood vaccination rates in the nation.
Changing the axis changes the story.
But the real story is this: access to education is on the line for a small group of families who have followed the law.
⏳ 15 days left — session ends July 31.
Whether this is your first time taking action or you have already contacted your legislators earlier in the campaign, please act again now.
📧 Send a one-click email in less than one minute: 👉 https://t.co/LWar5enfyk
This will send a message to your State Representative, State Senator, and the House Committee on Ways and Means urging them to oppose H.2554.
📞 Want to Do More?
Visit https://t.co/ykkmLnOhqy for: ✔️ Talking points ✔️ Phone call scripts ✔️ Legislator contact information ✔️ Advocacy resources and personalized email guidance
Please share this reel. Every email, phone call, message, and share helps ensure lawmakers hear from the families they represent before July 31.
#HealthActionMA #massachusetts #h2554
BUDGET WIN! Following significant lobbying and advocacy efforts led by Health Action MA — Senator Rausch was asked to withdraw Amendment EHS 546.
———-
Senator Becca Rausch submitted language from her controversial Community Immunity Act (S.3070) into the FY2027 Senate Budget under “Infectious Disease Prevention” through Amendment EHS 546.
This amendment proposed significant potentially harmful impacts on educational access, parental rights, and public health authority. Policies of this magnitude should never be inserted into the state budget process in a manner that bypasses the level of scrutiny, public debate, and legislative review such proposals warrant.
We are happy to report that the amendment was WITHDRAWN this evening.
This marked the sixth attempt to advance portions of her proposed legislation through the state budget process.
DONATE TO HELP US CONTINUE OUR WORK, VISIT https://t.co/5e8IfudH5h
OPPOSE: S.3070: An Act Promoting Community Immunity
To oppose go to: https://t.co/Nf7K9higVM
To learn more go to: https://t.co/bOSdeV5dvI
Under This Bill Minors Could Consent to Preventive Care, Including Vaccination, Without Parental Consent or Knowledge.
(SECTIONS 3 & 4)
S.3070 would broaden current Massachusetts minor consent law (M.G.L. c.112 §12F) by allowing minors to consent to medical care for the “prevention” of an illness they may “be at risk of contracting”, even if they have not been exposed to the illness and are unlikely to be exposed to the illness.. This is a material expansion of current law, which generally allows minors to consent only to “treatment” or “diagnosis” of illnesses they believe they are “suffering from” or have “come in contact with”. Adding the word “prevention” would allow minors to consent to vaccination without any input, notification or consent of parents.
The preventative care provided under these circumstances may be administered by a provider who is unaware of the minor’s medical history and with whom the minor has no established relationship, regardless of the minor’s age or intellectual capacity. The bill includes no safeguards to ensure a minor has the intellectual capacity to provide informed consent.
Records related to the care may be unavailable to parents due to medical privacy laws.
Current Massachusetts law generally relies on parental involvement in preventative medical decision-making for minors. Parents provide physicians with medical information about their children, including allergies, current medications or diagnoses, and past adverse reactions. This information is critical to a physician’s ability to give sound medical advice.
Removing parents from preventative medical decision-making involving minors unnecessarily creates risks for minors and raises significant medical, ethical, and legal concerns.
To oppose go to: https://t.co/Nf7K9higVM
🚨 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - A WIN FOR PARENTS
We have important news regarding S.1244 - An Act Enhancing Access to Abortion Care.
On July 1, 2026, the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing approved a substantially revised draft of S.1244, which will now move forward as S.3125 – An Act Enhancing Hospital Emergency Services.
The provisions that were the focus of Health Action Massachusetts' opposition are no
longer included in the substitute bill. Specifically, the proposed expansion of Massachusetts' minor consent law to allow qualifying minors to consent to preventive medical care—including vaccinations—without parental involvement, along with the proposed changes to §12F regarding abortion and sterilization, have been removed.
S.3125 is now focused on strengthening enforcement of Massachusetts' hospital emergency services law and has been referred to the Senate Ways and Means Committee for further consideration.
At this time, no further action is needed on S.3125.
To everyone who contacted legislators, shared our posts, submitted testimony, made phone calls, and helped educate others, and to our incredible lobbying team—thank you. Your advocacy helped ensure lawmakers heard from families across the Commonwealth.
💙 If you'd like to express your appreciation, go to https://t.co/Dnf9A3wCin for our Action Center where you can send a one-click thank-you email to the members of the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing.
#HealthActionMA #Massachusetts #ParentalRights #MinorConsent #HealthPolicy #Legislation #GrassrootsAdvocacy #MAPolitics #MedicalFreedom #ParentalInvolvement
Who Is Behind the Push to Remove Religious Exemptions in Massachusetts?
Watch to learn.
Then go to https://t.co/5e8IfudH5h to help preserve the religious exemption, to sign-up for our newsletter and to donate to Health Action MA — a REAL grassroots movement powered by REAL families fighting to protect religious liberty, parental rights, and access to education.
#massachusetts #healthactionma @standforhealth1@CHDTVLive@AaronSiriSG@agenturban@mafamilyaction1@MAFamilyInst
In an attempt to debunk the conspiracy theory of chemtrails, she couldn't debunk the truth.
Kristen exposed large quantities of Aluminum, Barium & Strontium being used.
When questions were raised, the heat & demonization began, that threatened the very safety of her family.
.@LDavisBerkshire Medical decisions must be made with full knowledge of a child’s history. The Community Immunity Act (S.1618) lets doctors vaccinate minors without knowing allergies, prior reactions, or risks. This is dangerous. Vote NO!
.@LDavisBerkshire Imagine this: A child with severe allergies gets vaccinated without their parents knowing. Hours later, they have a reaction—& no one knows why.
The Community Immunity Act (S.1618) makes this a real possibility. #VoteNoOnS1618#ProtectKids
.@LDavisBerkshire S.1618 lets schools & colleges deny religious exemptions & impose extra vaccine mandates. Parents with Doctors, not institutions, should decide. Vote NO! #ParentalRightsMatter#NoOnS1618
.@null@null Coercive policies erode the fundamental ethical principle of free and informed consent. Let's respect individual choices as H.604 and S.1391 should. #InformedConsent#RespectChoices https://t.co/42vvQ36BBI