What exactly is an E20-compliant vehicle? By definition, it's a vehicle engineered to safely and reliably run on E20 fuel. That also implies a non-E20-compliant vehicle is not designed for E20. Otherwise, the term "compliant" becomes meaningless.
So my question to Mr. @nitin_gadkari is simple: Why was E20 fuel rolled out nationwide when most vehicles on Indian roads were not E20-compliant?
If the answer is, "Nothing happens. Non-compliant vehicles can also run on E20," then what was the rationale behind mandating manufacturers to produce E20-compliant vehicles in the first place? Either E20 compatibility is technically necessary, in which case introducing E20 before the vehicle fleet was ready was questionable. Or it isn't necessary, in which case the compliance requirement itself appears redundant.
You can't simultaneously argue that E20 compliance is important enough to mandate for new vehicles, yet claim it doesn't matter because older, non-compliant vehicles can run on E20 anyway.
By the same logic, why stop at E20? Why not go full aatm-nirbhar and switch directly to E100? If compatibility doesn't matter, then non-E100-compliant vehicles should run on E100 too. Clearly, that's not how engineering works. So where exactly is the technical justification?
@ChappalAlliance First of all brother, @sundaysarthak never said that pollution is happening because of ethanol and issues is pollution specifically.
Why we never heard about the most polluted city of India before now because it became worse recently.
Har cheej ko propoganda mat bolo
When will this RACISM against NorthEast END?
1st JULY 2026
(This morning, my sister and I were travelling from Guwahati to Agartala by train. Upon reaching our reserved seats, we found that a family had kept the middle berth open, even though our reserved seats were on the lower berth.
As it was only 8:00 a.m., we politely requested that they fold the middle berth, since, according to railway rules, middle berths are meant to remain open only during the designated sleeping hours (10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.). Instead of cooperating, they refused our request and spoke to us in a rude and disrespectful manner.
We reported the matter to the railway staff, who intervened and resolved the issue. However, the unpleasant behaviour continued. While I was sitting on my sister’s lower berth, they told me, “One of your seats isn’t here. Go, go from here.” Although my own reserved seat was in the adjacent section, I was simply sitting on my sister’s berth, which did not violate any rule.
The situation escalated further when they began making racist remarks directed at us, including, “jyada dikhta hain kya? China se aaye ho kya?” (“Do you see things too much? Are you from China or what?”). Such comments were discriminatory, offensive, and entirely unacceptable. No passenger should have to endure racial abuse or disrespect while travelling. I hope the railway authorities take such incidents seriously and ensure that all passengers are treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their appearance or ethnicity.
(Courtesy: Shelly Debbarma ,FB)
@PMOIndia@AmitShah@DrManikSaha2@PradyotManikya@SangmaConrad@himantabiswa@PemaKhanduBJP@TanushreePande@PublicNewsX@HansrajMeena@NELiveTV@laikhutshangbi@itsnorth_star
#northeast #racist #verbalabuse #racialdiscrimination #stopracism #racismnortheastindia #endracism #racism #northeast #Tripura #nagaland #assam #Nagaland #Sikkim