Dear @ARanganathan72 Sir,
I don't know if you'll read this message or not but I'm clarifying my intentions.
I have watched your entire video in which you discussed reservations with Charvak. So, I completely agree with you on this point that reservations should be for a limited time period, and those who have already received reservations should not get them again. But, you also said that Hindus have a moral obligation to give reservations. I completely disagree with that. What you are saying, that there was oppression for centuries, they were not given water, and so forth all of that is leftist propaganda. There is a book called "The Beautiful Tree" which clearly shows that, before the British came, even Shudras studied in Gurukuls; Brahmins, Kshatriyas everyone studied in Gurukuls. But I don't know which leftist trash you are reading and saying these things that they couldn’t study, they had no rights, and so on. The second thing is, If there is a moral responsibility, then shouldn’t Muslims have a moral responsibility too, since for centuries they caused terror with the Mughals? Leave that aside, then people abuse the Manusmriti. We have had the constitution for 75 years. Before that, it was British rule for 200 years; before that, it was the Mughals. And never in any time did the Brahmins rule or did any Kshatriya enforce Manusmriti. Even if we consider Manusmriti wrong, it never ruled anywhere. So, this moral responsibility is absolutely not mine.
And, if I speak about myself, my family used to live in undivided Punjab in India; they lived in Punjab, Pakistan. We came here, we left our home; we had no support from the government. When we came here, we didn’t get any land, we didn’t get anything, we built ourselves up with our own strength; we did jobs, and we made our lives. Okay, and even today we are doing the same. And when I go for college admission, I am told bro, you oppressed them for thousands of years, so you have to get higher marks, and you have to pay higher fees. They pay no fees, less cutoffs, even -40 marks sometimes. Do you understand? This is one thing. And, even if there was discrimination for thousands of years, I didn't do it, nor did my family. And that is why I have no moral responsibility.
And there is no such thing as positive discrimination. Okay, if I get 700 to 750 marks and I get a college seat, and they get it at 500 marks, it is definitely not positive discrimination. Positive discrimination means, for instance, when you say, okay, we will also give them a good education in schools, and then they can complete their college with us we can still call that positive discrimination because no discrimination happened there. If they also get good education in schools. But, if you reduce the cut-off or, as you do with reservations, it is definitely not positive discrimination; it is negative discrimination, and therefore I oppose it. You should understand that, Anand ji.
And I have never abused you at all, so just keep it at that. Yes, I definitely support you on other things whatever you say about Hinduism or other matters I completely respect you. As for the fact that you have blocked me, I have no problem with that. It’s up to you.
Thank you.
An example from the past illustrating how UGC rules, if implemented, can be weaponised to settle personal vendettas:
Dr. Vaibhav Jain was a meritorious student at Indore Medical College in 2012. His MBBS classmate, Neha Verma, asked him to fill the medical entrance exam form again and sit behind her sister Pooja in the exam to tell her answers and help her pass. Vaibhav refused.
Neha got angry and retaliated by creating a fake Facebook profile in his name and uploading obscene content, then implicated him under the SC/ST Act, alleging he used casteist slurs. Vaibhav spent 50 days in jail and even took his second-year exams in handcuffs. Despite completing MBBS, the case blocked his chances of a govt job.
He fought a six-year legal battle before being acquitted. But imagine the trauma, embarrassment, struggle, and stigma he and his family endured for no fault of theirs.
UGC rules add an internal, low-threshold complaint route where allegations can trigger immediate academic or administrative action without rigorous scrutiny. Along with the SC/ST Act, this can be used to escalate pressure and settle scores faster.
Two days ago in Samastipur, five Dalit goons beheaded a Pandit and buried his head in the ground.
After that I checked the NCRB crime data.
In 2023, India recorded 27,727 murders, but only 908 victims were Dalits.
That is just about 3% of the total murders.
So the constant narrative that Dalits are the primary victims of violence in India simply does not match the actual crime data.
There are 234 MLAs in Tamilnadu assembly. 39 MPs. Not one of them is a Brahmin.
This is the same state where 95% of the population enjoys reservation. Basically, it is reservations for almost everyone except Brahmins. .
This is not social justice but complete marginalization of a minority community.
GCs of other states must remember: TN model today is India model tomorrow. TN first broke 50% barrier. Others are catching up.
If GCs do not fight against injustice today, this will be your future.
Did you know this?
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale's real/actual brother refused to resign from the Indian Army and completed his full regular service.
Captain Harcharan Singh Rode (also called Captain Harcharan Singh), who was one of Bhindranwale's elder brothers. He served in the Indian Army (notably as a Subedar Major in the 61 Engineers Regiment and later as Captain). Despite the events surrounding his brother Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale (including Operation Blue Star in 1984, where the army even called him to identify the body), he did not resign and continued/completed his military career normally until retirement. He passed away in 2025 at around age 90 and was remembered as a devoted person who remained proud of his service.
In the last 70 years we have spent $trillions for the upliftment of SC/ST & OBCs in India. Even after spending so much , each successive Govt is singing the same chorus song
Soschit- Vanchit-Peedith ( SVP)
GCs are at the receiving end of this never-ending song ( SVP) , With each passing day the intensity of this aberration is increasing. All these handouts are given at the expense of GCs
Already 3 generations ( one generation is 25 years) of the reserved category have enjoyed the benefits of reservations, if 3 generations of hand holding cannot make them compete amongst others as equals, what else can ?
Either the method adopted by the Govt is wrong or there is pilferage in the delivery mechanism and the benefits are not reaching the end users or the end beneficiary has got used to these special privileges and consider it as their birth right
As the most affected party of this largest handout in the history of mankind, GCs have every right to audit the funds allocated for these handouts, this bottomless pit has to be plugged
From now on Only one member of the reserved family should be entitled for reservation, it is the duty of that one member to uplift the family. None of the future generations in his family should be entitled for reservation.
There is a limit for everything and everything has a limit
Do you know why so many Arab countries are rushing to try and avoid a U.S. war against Iran ? Even those who have previously seen the Islamic Republic as an adversary ?
On the surface you hear concerns about collateral damage and energy supply instability. Underneath, there is an even deeper concern.
Zoroastrianism is widely considered the ancestral, pre-Islamic religion of the Kurds and Iranians (Persians). Many Iranians would now reject Islam if the regime was overthrown. That would in turn encourage the Kurds, some of whom are also rejecting Islam because of persecution, to seek their own autonomy or full national independence. Israel, of course, is already a non-Islamic State.
A domino effect could see many indigenous, ethnic groups seeking to establish rights or break away from fundamentalist Islamic rule and identity. This could potentially amount to a full scale re-ordering of power structures, and that is not an idea that suits the ruling families of the region.
"Brahmino-Baniyas, we are coming for you! We will avenge".
This was written on the wall of the School of Language, Literature and Culture Studies in JNU. (2nd building, 3rd floor) in 2022. JNU is one of India's top central public universities.
Let me restate this: if General category students are not included in protection against caste-based discrimination on campuses, then the UGC Promotion of Equity Regulations will be misused like the SC/ST Act.
It will be used as a weapon for personal grudges, jealousy, and to destroy careers.
J&K: Meet Haroon Wani ,a graduate from Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University Katra, SMVD Uni funded his education & helped him secure a job in a Pharma Company in Jammu. He decided to repay the favor by joining Hizbul-Mujahedeen & killed father & Uncle of Shagun Parihar in Kishtwar.
Modi's achievements
1. If anyone of GC "disrespects" some British stooges, you go to jail under his amended draconian atrocities act.
2. Persons with Zero marks teaching Maths and Physics while meritorious candidates are jobless.
3. Persons with -40 (yes, minus forty) marks will become doctors while deserving candidates are deprived of seats in medical colleges.
4. Vigilante squads will hunt down GC students for explicit and"implicit" discrimination.
5. If GC students are discriminated against, that will not even be considered caste discrimination.
6. M and C are given OBC reservations and they can only be victims of discrimination and have right to be in vigilante "equity squads".
If this is not a blueprint of state sanctioned apartheid, then what is?
BJP and Bhajipao IT cell were advocating against Rohith Vemula Act when Congress announced it. Then silently BJP via UGC implements its own Rohith Vemula Act across ALL STATES in India
Committees will have SC ST OBC & Women. Only GC Hindu Male will be excluded.
False Complaints can be made with no provision for disciplinary proceedings.
This is Communal Violence Bill of Congress in Caste Flavour. The Ethnic Cleansing of GC Hindus have been started by BJP #RohithVemulaBill
What Rahul Plans, Modi Executes!!
In the last four years, India has discovered:
> Six gold reserves in Rajasthan, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Karnataka, and Madhya Pradesh.
> Two oil reserves in Andaman and Uttar Pradesh.
> Three lithium sources in Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Jammu & Kashmir.
> One natural gas reserve in Andaman.
The funnier part is that none of these sites has been explored, and nothing has been extracted yet. Every month, the news makes headlines and is then forgotten. Two months later, the same news comes from some other place.
This cancer cell is the reason why many Dalits stayed back in East Pakistan in 1947.
Pre 1947 he railed against perceived upper caste tyranny, declared that Dalits aren't Hindus and will be treated fairly in Muslim majority Pakistan.
He was then rewarded with the post of the first law minister of Pakistan.
Barely a few months into it though, he abandoned his post and ran back to India, rail firmly tucked between his legs.
Why? In his own words
Islam is being offered as the sovereign remedy for all earthly evils… In that grand setting of the Shariat, Muslims alone are rulers while Hindus and other minorities are zimmies [dhimmis] who are entitled to protection at a price
“…Hindus will allow themselves… to be treated as zimmies in the land of their birth. Today they may… abandon their hearths and homes in sorrow but in panic.”
“…When I am convinced that my continuance in office in the Pakistan Central Government is not of any help to Hindus…I should not with a clear conscience create the false impression… that Hindus can live there with honour…”
He observed first hand the myth and horrible lie that is Jai Bheem Jai Meem! The reality is that in a Islamist country the Dalits are genocided and exterminated or converted.
While India Was Poor, a Prime Minister Was Allegedly Rich in Switzerland
No Business. No Inheritance. No Explanation.
So Where Did 2.5 Billion Swiss Francs Come From?
A Swiss magazine once asked a question India was told never to ask.
In 1991, Schweizer Illustrierte, one of Switzerland’s largest weekly publications, released an exposé on secret Swiss wealth allegedly held by global power figures.
Fourteen names were published.
Among dictators and strongmen appeared one Indian face.
Rajiv Gandhi - India
Alleged amount: 2.5 billion Swiss francs
This was not an Indian allegation.
It was not an election speech.
It was printed in Switzerland, with a photograph.
So let’s ask plainly.
How does an Indian Prime Minister accumulate 2.5 billion Swiss francs?
No private business history.
No multinational ownership.
No declared overseas fortune.
No inheritance on that scale.
Money does not appear by virtue of office.
If the report was false, the response should have been immediate.
Why was the magazine never sued in Swiss courts?
Why no international demand for correction?
Why no public explanation?
Instead, silence.
Now understand the scale.
2.5 billion Swiss francs in 1991, adjusted only for inflation, is roughly ₹50,000 crore today.
That excludes interest.
That excludes compounding.
That excludes decades of financial growth.
Just inflation.
While Indians were told there was “no black money,” a European publication printed names Indian media avoided.
History isn’t just erased by force.
Sometimes it is buried by obedience.
So ask the question again without fear.
No business. No inheritance. No explanation.
Where did 2.5 billion Swiss francs come from?
Ever wonder how Top Gun got actual fighter jets? Or how Transformers blew up real tanks on real bases?
Most countries cannot afford that. Hollywood can't either. But America figured out a way.
This is what happens: A studio wants to make a war film. The Pentagon says, "We'll give you jets, Tanks, soldiers—for free."
But there's a catch.
They get to read the script first. And if they don't like something? The Filmmakers change it. Or lose everything.
It's all about narrative control and the Pentagon has final approval.
Scenes showing American war crimes? Gone.
Dialogue about corruption? Softened.
The story changes to fit the message: America is strong. America is right. America always wins.
If a filmmaker says no, he has to spend a fortune in plane & tank rentals. Or use expensive special FX.
He also loses access to army bases & military experts who can make the film look as authentic as possible.
A cheap-looking film doesn't sell tickets. So Studios Won’t make profit & investors will lose faith. Most filmmakers won’t survive that choice.
American war films feel true because they have state resources. We unconsciously believe:
"American military = Professional. Powerful. Moral." Because the films are awesome.
Every big Hollywood war movie is more than entertainment. It's a two-hour recruitment ad. It's a two-hour propaganda piece setting a narrative of American supremacy.
The military gets young recruits who think war looks cool. And The world is made to believe that America is invincible.
Hollywood gets billion-dollar blockbusters. Studios make money. Movies stars become icons. Directors win Oscars. And you? You get a "great movie" and a very specific narrative installed in your mind.
Next time you watch an action movie where America looks invincible and heroic, remember:
You're not just watching a film.
You're watching a state-funded narrative.
The Pentagon approved every scene.
They paid for every explosion.
They wrote parts of the story.
Suggested Read:
National Security Cinema
by Matthew Alford and Tom Secker
🔥 Hello Hindus, brace yourselves… 🔥
Did you know this ??
➡️The Aga Khan Trust
➡️Archaeological Survey of India&
➡️the Ford Foundation
yes, the same Ford Foundation often accused of being part of the global “deep state” network by b j p IT cell
have together produced “Kids Manuals” to educate Indian children on heritage .
Foreign funded institutions + India’s own ASI = shaping what the next generation learns about your civilisation 😂
And you weren’t even told. You have been kept in dark!
But don’t worry…
I’m sure this is all just “harmless cultural work,” right?
What could possibly go wrong when the deep state starts writing your children’s textbooks? 😏🔥
All this under vishwaguru’s rule 😁
Massive Expose!
The Lone Dalit Woman Who Dared to Defy the Constitution: Dakshayani Velayudhan Took on Ambedkar, Exposed Quotas, and Was Buried by History
Bharat was fooled. Ambedkar was hailed as the “hero of the Constitution,” while B.N. Rau was the true chief architect. Ambedkar was merely the chairman of the Drafting Committee.
This wasn’t just a historical miscredit-it set the tone for suppressing dissenting voices in shaping modern India. Many patriots and visionaries were silenced.
One such voice was Dakshayani Velayudhan, the first and only Dalit woman in the Constituent Assembly. A fierce advocate for her community, she stood firmly against caste-based reservations during the Constitution debates.
In her speech on November 8, 1948 she vehemently opposed RESERVATION.
Despite her fierce opposition to reservations, she was ignored and sidelined by Ambedkar and the political elite, who pushed through caste-based quotas that served politics more than people.
Her warnings were buried, and today, her voice remains erased from mainstream history. The narrative glorifies quotas as liberation, hiding the truth that they institutionalized caste divisions.
Dakshayani Velayudhan was silenced, just like many others. But her truth is fierce and clear: India cannot rise on caste politics; it can only soar on merit, education, and empowerment.
History must remember her and all suppressed voices- the real architects of truth.
Further to the bhai-chara drama that happened in Jammu. We already know the credentials of the donor and his daughter aligned with Congress and AAP.
Here is the biodata of the other party; the victim card holder:
1.Arfaz Ahmad Daing
2.Father’s Name: Ghulam Qadir Daing.
3. Alleged profession: Reporter ( News Sehar)
4.Criminal Record:
•FIR No. 248/2019 U/S 382, 341, 411, 201 RPC registered at Police Station Trikuta Nagar, Jammu. Challan produced before the City Court, Jammu on 27-11-2019.
•FIR No. 89/2021 U/S 341, 323, 504, 505, 506, 34 IPC & 23 POCSO Act registered at Police Station Trikuta Nagar, Jammu. Challan produced before the POCSO Court, Jammu on 17-03-2022.
•FIR No. 93/2022 U/S 153A, 295A, 505 IPC registered at Police Station Trikuta Nagar, Jammu. Challan produced before the Court of Sub Judge, Jammu on 18-05-2024.
•FIR No. 31/2024 U/S 451, 509 IPC registered at Police Station Peer Mitha, Jammu. Current status of the case verified from the concerned Police Station.
5.Background Information:
On 10 August 2022, a raid was conducted at the residence of Arfaz Ahmad Daing, a day after police arrested Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Talib Hussain from the Reasi area. Talib Hussain was involved in multiple explosions in Rajouri and was the founder of the “New Sehar” news portal. It was revealed that Talib had stayed at Daing’s residence.
News link here: https://t.co/nVUo4V4dPe
Talib Hussain, who had also joined the BJP, was allegedly using the portal New Sehar — the source of its funding remains unclear and doubtful.
@AadiAchint@Sanjay_Dixit@myplacenhistory@DrVikasPadha@KhajuriaManu
If Chanakya were here, Devdutt’s fantasies would last about as long as the kūśa grass he ripped out when he vowed to destroy the Nandas. Devdutt’s entire thesis rests on one illusion: if he can confuse you with multiple names, shout “interpolation!” a few times, and wrap it in modern caste-politics, maybe just maybe, he can make 1,000 years of evidence of Chanakya’s existence disappear. But the moment you actually look at the sources, his narrative collapses flat.
Let’s start with where he doesn’t want you to look: the Arthaśāstra itself. In multiple verses it explicitly names Viśnugupta Kautilya as its author:
“विष्णुगुप्तेन आर्यकौटिल्येन च सम्पादितम्” (“Compiled by Viśnugupta the noble Kautilya”)
“समाप्तं कौटिलीयम् अर्थशास्त्रम्” (“Here ends the Arthaśāstra of Kautilya”).
Devdutt’s primary deception rests on creating two doubts in the reader's mind: first, that since the Arthaśāstra names “Kautilya,” Chanakya must be fictional; second, that if he can push the Arthaśāstra to a later date, then Chanakya couldn’t have existed in Mauryan times or guided Chandragupta.
But the moment you place the Arthaśāstra’s author in time, things get murky for Devdutt. Ashoka’s edicts (3rd c. BCE) describe an administrative system of mahāmātras, welfare officers, anti-animal-slaughter days, judicial ethics - all straight out of the Arthaśāstra. The Mauryan empire cannot be founded on a Kautilyan framework if the text didn’t exist until 500 CE. The empire itself proves Kautilya predates Ashoka to at least 4th c. BCE as tradition says.
Then comes the Spitzer Manuscript, the oldest Sanskrit manuscript found so far (1st–2nd c. CE), which contains unmistakable references to the Arthaśāstra. And where was it found? A Buddhist monastery in Kizil, Xinjiang - 1000s of miles away from any “Brahmin power structure.” This alone demolishes Devdutt’s claims. Buddhists were studying Kautilya centuries before his imaginary “500 CE Brahmin invention.” Why would Buddhists preserve such “Brahminical propaganda”? They preserved it because it was already an established, authoritative, valuable text.
Next comes the knockout punch: the Kāmāndakīya Nītiśāra (4th c. CE) is a political treatise in the nīti-śāstra tradition, written by Buddhist scholar Kāmāndaki (कामान्दकि). He explicitly & admiringly states that the great Viśnugupta/Kautilya who authored the Arthaśāstra was the exact same strategist who overthrew the Nandas and guided Chandragupta Maurya to victory. This is the same storyline attributed to Chanakya in later literature. Why would a Buddhist writer like Kāmāndaki, with zero incentive to glorify a Brahmin minister, directly attribute Kautilya with the same glorious achievements as those of Chanakya the revolutionary? Because they were the same person. The Kāmāndakīya Nītiśāra text is the bridge which conclusively links : Arthaśāstra's Viśnugupta = Kautilya = Chanakya (in later Buddhist/Jain/Hindu sources)
Several other Buddhist sources specifically identify Viśnugupta/Kautilya as Chandragupta’s kingmaker. Jain sources like the Nisītha Cūrṇi and Hemacandra’s Pariśiṣṭaparvan identify Chanakya as the very same kingmaker overthrowing the same Nandas for the same Chandragupta. Gupta-era dramas like Mudrārākṣasa assume everyone already knows Kautilya as Chanakya. Kashmir’s Tantrākhyāyikā tradition immortalizes “Chanakya” as the archetype of political strategy. Across all traditions - Buddhist, Jain, Hindu, Kashmiri, Gupta - it is the same man performing the same deeds under different names.That is not myth-making. That is historical convergence, the strongest form of evidence when history spans 1000s of years.
As for the multiple names? In ancient worlds, it was perfectly normal. Confucius was also called Kong Qiu, Kongzi, Zhongni. In India: Viśnugupta is the personal name, Kautilya the gotra/scholarly name, & Chanakya the patronymic. One man. Many names. Total consistency. Pretending these names represent three different people is like claiming “Zhongni disproves Confucius.”
Devdutt also relies on the mention of “China” and “Roman coins” to push the Arthaśāstra centuries forward. But historian K. P. Jayaswal has already demonstrated that “Cina” here refers to the Śina/Shina Himalayan region of Gilgit, not Han China, which is why the Arthaśāstra uses kauseya and chinapatta, neither of which are Chinese words. And yes, references to Roman dīnāra are probably later interpolations - just like the many interpolations in Homer, the Pentateuch, or Euclid. No scholar ever claimed that these interpolations proved the authors never existed. Devdutt deploys this strategy only because he needs the text to look late, so that he can detach it from Chanakya and declare him a “Brahmin myth.”
Then comes the collapse of Devdutt's obsessive caste narrative. The earliest sources calling Chanakya a Brahmin are Buddhist and Jain works not Hindu ones - traditions which historically resisted Brahmin power. The Mahāvaṃsa (Buddhist), the Divyāvadāna (Buddhist), the Nisītha Cūrṇi (Jain), and Hemacandra’s Pariśiṣṭaparvan (Jain) all identify him as a Brahmin minister centuries before Hindu traditions elaborated the narrative. If “Brahmins invented Chanakya,” why do rival traditions repeat the same identity independently? Because they were recounting historical memory, not mythic propaganda.
So to make it crystal clear: Chanakya, Kautilya, and Viśnugupta are not three different people - they are simply three traditional names for a single historical strategist. This is exactly how ancient India named its great thinkers: a personal name (Viśnugupta), a gotra or scholastic name (Kauṭilya), and a patronymic (Chanakya). Tradition even preserves additional variants like Dramila, Draumina, Vishamashila & Anśula. Every independent source - Buddhist, Jain, Hindu, Gupta-era, Kashmiri all uses these names interchangeably for the same individual performing the same political revolution. This is not ambiguity; this is unanimity. One mind. One statesman. One architect of empire. Three names, one genius - exactly as ancient Bharat preserved its greatest figures.
Bottom line: three competing religious traditions which often competed as rivals, sometimes even hostile to each other - all remembering the same brilliant strategic genius of Magadha, overthrowing the same Nanda for the same Chandragupta Maurya in the same century CANNOT be coincidence. Devdutt winning the lottery while filming a TikTok and getting struck by lightning inside a volcanic eruption is statistically more likely. There is no “Brahmin propaganda.” There's only history refusing to bow to Devdutt's nauseating political biases and casteist agenda.
When such an overwhelming number of Bharatiya traditions, texts, chronicles, and political manuals over 2000 years point to the same genius - Chanakya/Kautilya/ Viśnugupta with the same narrative, then you don’t get to call him a myth and get away with it!
Devdutt’s article isn’t researched scholarship; it’s the same old casteist provocation wrapped in pseudo-history which crumbles instantly like a soggy biscuit in hot tea - the moment primary sources are allowed to speak.