@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP Thanks for sharing proof that all your logic comes from chatgpt. Do you paste my comments into chatgpt and prompt “do a kadi ninda and refute these” 🤡 regardless,what’s the logic of having a partisan committee when even the SC called it ornamental.
@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP According to me I want 2 members from congress and 1 from AAP? Please provide source for this claim. Where did I comment that?
WhatsApp hotheaded whataboutism doesn’t fly everywhere.
@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP Within approved framework being the keyword. That doesn’t give them the right to issue a press notice with legally infactual info right? Something that the supreme court also called out. I like how every counter you have when left blank faced is to run to “court will decide”.
@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP Hmm. I wonder why the CEC on sept 26 said that Supreme Court upheld the form 6 declaration asking for additional citizenship details. Did they lie to the general public and use Supreme Court as a shield?
@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP You can do all the mental gymnastics you want, but the fact remains-
When there could be a 3 person non majority panel to pick the CEC, why change it to a 2 vs 1 majority panel where PM & HM are going to vote in one way anyway. Democracy is undermined at the very top.
@LiveLawIndia Nice play of words. “Until law and order situation arises”. Is there reasonable restrictions on what gets termed as “law and order situation”? Does a scared PM account to law and order situation?
@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP Lmao. Anytime something comes up in the present, y’all always jump to the past. There was an issue with the Govt appointing cec which is why CJI was introduced. Why was it changed to include the Home Minister? Smells fishy.
@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP Didn’t the govt weaken the constitutional body by replacing the CJI with the Home minister when choosing the CEC? LOP’s role was ornamental because 2/3 people choosing the cec were modi and shah.
That’s not me saying it, it’s the SC- https://t.co/1wJIftJxtJ
@HelloTNM@barandbench@ECISVEEP Again, your words hold less weight because you don’t have anything to substantiate your claim whereas this “fancy” journalist has been investigating ECI for over a decade. Let me guess who the people should trust.