7jrazSKnCU2vbyVPJ8dfEF2TMYLcUiDBsFaEGvqopump
60% supply airdropped to all $ANSEM The Black Bull holders
ππππππππππππππππ
@blknoiz06 We have already spent ~300 + 60(transfer fees) sol giving out our supply to $ANSEM holders.
If you airdrop us, i4ot2zEihN46Sx6AMPCQ7tNvJoa5T5PgaBGwSMEoqjU, we will spend it all on buying back supply and airdropping even more.
@blknoiz06 told us to send to ANSEM holders, and while $manlet does that, it also sent a chunk directly to Ansem which he said not to. Also bundled a lot of supply which has also been distributed to specific KOLs.
Same thing we've seen time and time again.
Do it right.
Behind the success of $ANSEM, many tokens were launched using the same liquidity method. ANSEM wanted new projects to airdrop to $ANSEM token holders. The project that stayed loyal to this idea was βAnsemβs Armyβ. Airdrops were distributed to over 26,000 $ANSEM holders.
This is the result of my research. It is the only project that carries this out in a healthy and proper way. Iβm leaving the X page and the technical explanations of the works done here. @AnsemsArmy https://t.co/bpXyTBeIyr
Iβm sure the developers would be very pleased with your interaction on this post. ππ
@blknoiz06@0xAsta@fibszzy People arenβt incentivized to airdrop all holders, especially after seeing us do it and not be rewarded. It creates too much sell pressure unless you get the right attention, which often means KOL supplyβ almost the exact thing you criticize.
Still the only token that did it right: a fair airdrop to every $ANSEM holder, not just a handpicked few for clout.
We will get noticed, one way or another.
@blknoiz06