King Koopa

Father, husband, coach, employment lawyer. I probably care too much about sports. #THFC #USMT #PennState #Ravens #Yankees #FPL

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@LastWordOnSpurs @SkySportsNews He's only 23 years old. At times he's been one of our best. Who would we bring in to replace him? Maybe just hold?

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@JJWatt Romero gets 7 red cards, a 2-year ban, and a severe flogging for that tackle

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@BradWCAttorney Was she charged with being totally fucking awesome?

[Brad Polumbo @brad_polumbo]

This tweet is still up and the statute of limitations has not expired. I eagerly await justice being served.

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@tbooth1388 @FPL_TomHadley I got knocked out of the Always Cheating Last Cheater Standing league because of that. Thought I’d survived when he got the 10th, only to have it all ripped away!

[Anthony Scaramucci @Scaramucci]

Actual quotes from President Trump:

Trump’s “victory timeline” claims.

Mar 3: "We won the war."
Mar 7: "We defeated Iran."
Mar 9: "We must attack Iran."
Mar 9: "The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully.
March 10: practically nothing left to target
Mar 11: “You never like to say too ⁠early you won. We won. In ​the first hour it was over.” Mar 12: "We did win, but we haven't won completely yet."
Mar 13: "We won the war."
Mar 14: "Please help us."
Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will certainly remember it."
Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all."
Mar 16: "I was just testing to see who's listening to me."
Mar 16: "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer something very bad."
Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help."
Mar 17: "I don't need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO."
Mar 18: "Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz."
Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip - step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz."
Mar 20: "NATO are cowards."
Mar 21: "The Strait of Hormuz must be protected by the countries that use it. We don't use it, we don't need to open it."
Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours. Open the strait"
Mar 22: "Iran is Dead"

Mar 23: "We had very good and productive talks with Iran."
Mar 24: "We’re making progress."
Mar 25: “They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.” Mar 26: "Make a deal, or we’ll just keep blowing them away."
Mar 27: "We don’t have to be there for NATO."
Mar 28: No major quote
Mar 29: Claimed talks were progressing
Mar 30: "Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately, or face devastating consequences."
Mar 31: Claimed a deal was "very close" and that Iran would "do the right thing"
Apr 1: "We’ll see what happens very soon."
Apr 2: Repeated that a deal was likely, while warning of continued strikes if not
Apr 3: "Something big is going to happen."
Apr 4: Said Iran must comply "immediately" or face further consequences.

Apr 5: "Open the fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah."
April 6 :a whole civilization will die
April 7: total and complete victory
April8: objectives were met

A true disaster

[crunchyrugger @crunchyrugger]

Trump: do as I say, or I will bomb you back to the stone ages

Iran: best I can do is this 10 point plan where you give us everything we want

Trump: deal!

FoxNews: Trump is a master negotiator

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@FirstDownMediaa Let's go with Softest Takes Ever for $1000, Ken

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@JackPosobiec Those Trump lines are crazy!

[New York Yankees @Yankees]

Rise & Shine.

#OpeningDay | #RepBX

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@DanNtheLionsDen @RJSprouse @RepThomasMassie This bill would require way more than the ID required for any of those things. You do understand that, right?

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@RobS7 @RJSprouse @RepThomasMassie I'm not sure I understand your question. The law is already that only citizens can vote. And, under the current law, the evidence of non-citizens voting is statistically insignifcant.

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

Can someone who supports the SAVE Act provide proof that there is an actual (non-imagined) problem of non-citizens voting in our elections?

Every audit/study I've seen shows non-citizen voting to be a non-issue: the LA audit that found 79 potential non-citizen voters among 2.9 million registered voters; the UT study that found zero confirmed cases; and, the 7-state study covering 35 million registered voters that ran voter rolls through the SAVE database, which identified only 4,200 non-citizens registered (i.e. 0.01% of registered voters) and even that number is high because it was found many were erroneously flagged for administrative errors.

If there is not a real problem, how does the solution outweigh the potential harm, which is quite real? Approx 21 million voting-age U.S. citizens lack immediate access to documents proving citizenship. When KS tried a similar law in 2013, 30,000+ eligible voters were blocked from registering before the law was struck down.

The SAVE Act is a solution in search of problem. This begs the question, why? Is it simply to appease constituents who have been duped into believing there is widespread voting by non-citizens? Or is it to intentionally disenfranchise legitimate voters that historically vote for the other party?

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

Can someone who supports the SAVE Act provide proof that there is an actual, non-imagined problem of non-citizens voting in our elections?

Every audit/study shows non-citizen voting to be a non-issue: the LA audit that found 79 potential non-citizen voters among 2.9 million registered voters; the UT study that found zero confirmed cases; and, the 7-state study covering 35 million registered voters that ran voter rolls through the SAVE database, which identified only 4,200 non-citizens registered (i.e. 0.01% of registered voters) and even that number is high because many were erroneously flagged for administrative errors.

If there is not a real problem, how does the solution outweigh the potential harm, which is quite real? Approx 21 million voting-age US citizens lack immediate access to documents proving citizenship. When KS tried a similar law in 2013, 30,000+ eligible voters were blocked from registering before the law was struck down.

The SAVE Act is a solution in search of problem. This begs the question, why? Is it simply to appease constituents who have been duped into believing there is widespread voting by non-citizens? Or is it to intentionally disenfranchise legitimate voters that historically vote for the other party?

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@ajhenslo @MenInBlazers His right air

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@JMS78 Was he flying into London to save the season for us?

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@COYS_com The Championship

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@InvertTheWing Shouldn't have even been a foul. Sarr stiff-armed him in the face and he was trying to move that stiff-arm away. Soft-ass, namby pamby bullshit league.

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@PeterNotDrury He was thinking that he was being stiff-armed in the face

[King Koopa @AnthonyBowser]

@Rutters just won the @sheetz vs @Wawa debate

[YDR online @ydrcom]

Martin's partners with Rutter's to bring BBQ chip seasoning to hot food https://t.co/NklGewJTmw