@BManJackson1899@GrimbertPro@mz_storymakers@wulfschmiese@ZDF Deine Argumentation ist lächerlich. Wenn du für 42 Geschlechter bist, dann wähle das. Dass die Weidel eine Lebensgefährtin in der Schweiz hat und du das als bad point vorbringst ist einfach nur billig.
@SurfGrobi@Frank_vd_Valk@JLampeitl Bist du dumm oder so? Zuhause werden einfach die Briefe der Großeltern aufgemacht und für die gewählt, fertig. Wie machst du das in den Wahllokalen?
@Albert_618@karaoke_andi Yes, §3 is listed there, but: conscription itself is still suspended (no draft). So this doesn’t contradict anything — it just means parts of the framework still exist, not that people are being conscripted or restricted in everyday life.
@Albert_618@karaoke_andi Conscription in Germany is currently still suspended, meaning there is no active draft.
The 3-month rule only applies to men who could theoretically be conscripted if activation happens — not the general population. If you’ve already completed service, it doesn’t apply to you.
@Albert_618@karaoke_andi And where in the law does it say that every man has to ask for permission if he wants to leave the country for more than three months? Thats completely made up
@MariusSm1th @Zelusfin Wyckoff patterns aren’t perfect templates, agreed. My point is that we never deviated the range low and the supposed SOS was rejected back into the range. That behavior weakens the accumulation thesis and currently looks more like redistribution to me.
@MariusSm1th @Zelusfin Sorry, but in order to have a valid range with accumulation, you first have to deviate the lows. Here, we see exactly the opposite. This chart shows distribution, not accumulation