#ALSCT: Holding belated claims against previously fictitious defendants did not relate back to filing of original complaint because a reasonably diligent plaintiff would have been able to ascertain the identities earlier https://t.co/yiuYXSRHgD
#ALSCT: Aff'g trial court's order compelling plaintiff to arbitrate his claims against defendant because the determination of whether the arbitration clause applies to plaintiff's claims is for arbitrator to decide https://t.co/bDQoiHXUuO
#ALSCT: Denying defendant's petition for writ of mandamus because no exception applied to general rule preventing interlocutory review of trial court's denial of motions for judgment on the pleadings turning on whether plaintiff stated a cognizable claim https://t.co/hrn9v1jwl8
#ALSCT: Aff'g dismissal of lawsuit brought by county engineer for breach of employment contract finding Cty. Comm'n exceeded its authority by attempting to contract away the power to terminate an at-will employee at its pleasure https://t.co/j0Nhy1EQAg
#ALSCT: Granting counterclaim defendant’s mandamus petition because fraud claims against it were clearly barred by applicable statute of limitations and such claims did not negate such limitations period under Ala. Code § 6-8-84 by relating back https://t.co/o2Fk0uqBz5
#ALSCT: Dismissing as untimely an appeal of an order removing appellant as personal representative of brother’s estate and affirming order assessing damages against appellant for malfeasance in administration the estate https://t.co/As9l0prZOs
#ALSCT: Affirming trial court’s order granting defendant’s Rule 60 motion and setting aside of $2m default judgment because service of complaint by publication was improper https://t.co/MqnTg9YO7I
#ALSCT: Granting plaintiff’s mandamus petition and directing trial court to vacate order striking jury demand because amended complaint included two new issues on which plaintiff made timely demand for jury trial https://t.co/tYYeUQJrVO
#ALSCT: Declining to adopt or apply the "apex rule" to preclude former UMC bishops from being deposed in action alleging child abuse against a youth pastor https://t.co/nO6Bnshz6k
#ALSCT: Holding the Ala. Medical Liability Act precludes discovery in current wrongful death suit related to acts hospital took/failed to take after patient's previous suicide attempts https://t.co/PpIshfgfyO
#ALSCT: Affirming trial court’s JMOL in favor of plaintiff on City’s counterclaims of trespass and negligence on basis of emergency. Reversing trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs on inverse-condemnation claim b/c injuries were not ascertainable https://t.co/YF9Qn1nFqC
#ALSCT: Reversing lower court holding that Alabama Memorial Preservation Act was unconstitutional, finding City defendants violated the Act by placing plywood screen around monument in park owned/operated by City, and imposing $25k fine for such violation https://t.co/8f1jGKldP2
#ALSCT: Declining to apply workers comp. exclusivity when employee sued his employer for negligence in transporting him to treatment after his workplace incident, which caused additional injury https://t.co/rM2rVknMEe
#ALSCT: Granting writ of mandamus ordering venue transfer to Elmore County, where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred https://t.co/IeiMrZGUHm
#ALSCT: Holding ERISA does not preempt personal rep.’s ability to collect 401(k) benefits from deceased’s wife under breach of contract theory https://t.co/pzpM0rLhDo
#ALSCT: Reversing default judgment as void because the trial court never acquired personal jurisdiction over defendant due to plaintiff's failure to satisfy burden of proving service of process was effectuated https://t.co/pZHn5qLM5S
#ALSCT: Issuing writ of mandamus and directing transfer of action to another venue because a substantial part of the events giving rise to action for breach of contract and bad faith against insurance company did not occur in county where accident occurred https://t.co/htoXzf2tj5
#ALSCT: Reversing summary judgment in favor of law firm in a petition for dissolution of the law firm because a Rule 56 hearing should have been held on a previous law firm member's motion to dismiss, which was treated as a motion for summary judgment https://t.co/BOh1VS91Wa