Olivia
Online
Samantha Biddle
@AquariusWoman44
Survivor-led platform exposing CSE safeguarding failures in Telford post-Crowther. Two children failed. Truth denied. We will not be silent. #CourageOverSilence
UK
Joined October 2023
358 Following
272 Followers
344 Posts
Pinned Tweet
Telford’s Less-Known CSE Reality: When the School Environment Fails to Protect
Most people still picture CSE as only grooming gangs. Telford’s own official police data tells a different, far more uncomfortable story: 54% of CSE suspects in the borough were under 18. In the latest 2025 annual report, 38% of suspects were still under 18.
This is peer-on-peer child sexual exploitation happening inside our schools and colleges.
Here is what it actually looks like:
A child suffers repeated recorded sexual abuse and coercion by a peer. The school knows. Instead of removing the risk, the school places her in the same rooms as her abuser. She ends up in hospital. The abuse escalates, and ends in rape. The year group continues the abuse in corridors and online. No one is held accountable. The victim’s severe trauma and mental health deterioration are logged as “behaviour”. She is sanctioned daily, isolation, exclusions, blame, by the very staff supposed to protect her. The school turns on the victim and her parent. Both are officially recorded as the problem. Eventually she has no choice but to leave education entirely to stay safe.
In what normal world do we punish a child for the effects of her own abuse?
Yet the pattern repeats. The harm is seen on paper, then quietly translated into behaviour, parental concern, and attendance.
This matters to every parent because school is the place most of us choose to send our children. Home-schooling is an option, but the vast majority of families rely on schools. If the school environment enables grooming and then punishes the child for reacting to it, we are sending our sons and daughters somewhere they can be exploited and blamed for showing the damage.
Even in a borough that is well-equipped with specialist teams, annual reports, and post-inquiry reforms, the harm can still escalate.
If a case with years of recorded evidence can still result in the victim being re-exposed and sanctioned rather than protected, that should raise serious alarm bells for every parent.
Telford publishes more CSE data than almost any other council. Those numbers are already high. Real experiences suggest the true scale is even higher, because many incidents are never logged as CSE at all. They are recorded as bullying, truancy or “not upheld”.
We rightly demand action on adult grooming gangs.
We must demand the same rigour for peer-on-peer school-embedded exploitation, because it happens in the one place most of our children have no choice but to go.
Recognition without protection is not reform.
Our children deserve to go to school without being groomed or punished for it.
https://t.co/LsD5W5iHkN
I promise you: trauma survivors will break out of every box you try to put us in, literal or otherwise.
You have never met a human more hell bent on not feeling controlled or trapped than a survivor recovering from complex trauma.
One way you can tell if a relationship, personal or professional, is safe, is whether you can check in w/ how the relationship is doing & where it's going without backlash.
Safe relationships don't leave you guessing if you want clarity.
This is exactly why Baroness Casey identified the need to address the systemic multi agency Safeguarding failures evidenced in the Grooming Gangs, Southport killings, Sara Sharif, Harvey Willgoose and Nottingham
These are not one off random incidents
These are serious systemic multi agency Safeguarding failures
This is costing the lives of vulnerable members of society
These are government services who are weaponising Lawfare and Psychiatry as a means of power and control over society and our families
At the first suggestion of a challenge out comes the 'mental health' card, from every public sector
If we don't agree to submit to their abuse, they get to label us as mentally ill
It is the most inhumane and corrupt Abuse of Power imaginable being used to cover up their failures
Usually on this account I write about systems, reform, and the gap between what is promised and what is actually delivered. This page is different. It’s from a quieter ledger I keep elsewhere, fragments written in dusk and dawn, from the window of our own street.
No names.
No exposé.
Just the inner temperature of what it feels like when harm is seen, recorded… and still not held. It’s the other half of the same story. If the systemic posts are about the machinery, these pages are about what the machinery leaves behind in a body and a family. They are more personal, more reflective.
If this resonates, you’re welcome to sit with it.
No pressure.
Just presence.
https://t.co/HVupOhVZ91
#sunrisesandsunsets
This is different from what I usually share here. Normally these pages stay on my personal ledger, quiet reflections from the window of our own street.
Moments captured. A place to name what the body remembers when the official record won’t. Today I’m trying something new and sharing one.
More personal.
More reflective.
A view from inside the glass.
Sunrises & Sunsets
28 March
Sunrise 1509
The Split in the Glass
Morning comes polished.
The town lifts its face to the light
and repeats the sentence it wants believed.
"A place to thrive."
Windows rinsed gold.
Doors named open.
Young voices raised high enough
to sound like reform.
We have lived here long enough
to know brightness is not always warmth.
Sometimes it is surface.
Sometimes it is strategy.
Sometimes it is the clean public half
of something that survives by keeping
its darker work out of sight.
Because glass does two things at once:
it lets the light through,
and sends a likeness back.
Glass One
In public,
the language is flawless.
Opportunity.
Support.
Voice.
Confidence.
A future held high enough
to photograph.
The kind of language no decent person wants to interrupt.
The kind that arrives already wearing innocence.
Child-safe. Community-safe.
Pleasant enough to travel.
And that is part of the architecture.
Not only what is said,
but where it is said.
In the square.
Near the cameras.
Under the careful weather
of civic kindness.
Elsewhere,
the same town keeps another fluency.
Smaller.
Colder.
The corridor dialect.
The one that can look directly at harm
and still ask the file to carry it differently.
Not danger.
Behaviour.
Not trauma.
Attendance.
Not protection owed.
A pathway.
A process.
A complaint route.
Exhausted avenues.
The old winter,
rewritten in administrative light.
A place to thrive.
said where the glass is clean.
Glass Two
This is the split.
Not a contradiction, exactly.
A partition.
One face for the square.
One hand for the file.
Some systems learn to survive that way.
They praise children in public,
then translate one child in private
until even the record begins to sound
as if she failed the room
rather than the room failing her.
That is what makes it so difficult
to explain to people
who have only ever stood outside the building.
From there,
the brightness looks like care.
From there,
the language seems enough.
They do not hear the corridor lengthen.
They do not feel the temperature change.
They do not watch the same harm walk in
and come back out
wearing manners.
They do not see how neatly
a wound can be taught to speak
in institutional terms.
How fast fear becomes paperwork.
How quickly impact becomes tone.
How efficiently a child can be moved
from the centre of concern
to the edge of inconvenience,
without anyone in the square
having to alter their expression.
That is the performance only some people see.
Not because it is invisible.
Because it is split.
The building shines one truth.
The corridor keeps another.
Glass Three
And still,
I do not walk into the comments
and set the other record down beside the applause.
I could.
That is the simplest part.
A few lines.
A truer weather.
Enough to disturb the surface
for those willing to see through it.
I don’t.
Not because the record is weak.
Because children are not leverage.
Because I will not carry one child
into a public square
and set her unhealed truth
beside celebration
to strengthen my standing in an argument.
Because some of us still recognise a line,
even now.
Even here.
Even while watching people
who speak most fluently
about hearing young voices
show so little reverence
for what it costs a child
to have one.
That is its own kind of ache.
Not silence.
Restraint.
Not defeat.
Self-sovereignty.
The choice to leave intact
what may be good for some,
even while knowing
how selectively that goodness is distributed.
The choice not to stain a light
that might still warm another child,
simply because I know
what it did not warm in mine.
It is a shame
more people do not feel bound
by the same line.
Glass Four
There is another part
people rarely name.
The inward cost.
Everyone understands, eventually,
that this kind of split wounds
the ones beneath it.
But I am no longer convinced
that is where the damage ends.
To live divided like that,
to lift light with one hand
and lower the blind with the other,
something in the person
must keep narrowing.
Not always visibly.
Not dramatically.
Professionally.
A little less flinch.
A little more fluency.
A little more distance
between duty
and what the body knows duty is.
That is how moral injury multiplies.
Not only in the child
left carrying what should have been held,
but in the adult
who learns to call the partition normal.
To smile in the square.
To manage the file.
To let language take the place of conscience
often enough
that performance begins to feel like service.
And perhaps that is why
some buildings glow so well.
The light is not only illumination.
It is cover.
It softens the seam.
It brightens the surface.
It lets a town admire its own reflection
without asking what had to be dimmed
to make that reflection possible.
Glass Five
Morning keeps arriving.
The posts go up.
The slogans travel.
The town congratulates itself
in a brighter font.
And somewhere beyond the glass,
the older record remains exactly what it was:
not a communications problem,
not a misunderstanding,
not a family too difficult to reassure,
not a truth that needed softer branding,
but a harm that passed
through official hands
and came back lighter
than it should have.
That is the part
the square can never bless.
What was seen
was not held.
The light was for the building.
Not the record.
So let the glass shine
for those who need the light.
I will not drag a child
into the comments
to prove I could darken it.
But I will keep the ledger.
Because glass remembers fingerprints
even when the town prefers reflection.
Reputation precedes safety.
Telford’s “Reformed” Model: Recognition Without Protection
Telford & Wrekin presents itself as a national success story in child sexual exploitation reform. After the 2022 Independent Inquiry it promised contextual safeguarding, including peer-on-peer pathways, and specialist services to catch every kind of CSE, alongside grooming gangs.
The borough claims this model now works so well it is fit to be exported to other areas.
That is the public narrative.
Yet one case sat entirely inside that exact framework.
In our documented case, multiple police-logged incidents of peer sexual violence, coercion, hate crime, death threats, and stalking with breach of confidential support services were all recorded, carried out by the perpetrator and his peer group. The full police record and lived-experience mapping were provided to the Local Authority and CSE survivor services. Every agency had visibility.
The Local Authority held the evidence but refused any retrospective review or escalation. No MACE, no reopening of safeguarding, no change in pathway. The harm was translated into behaviour, attendance and complaint processes. External support closed. The child’s official education and safeguarding record was left framed only as “non-engagement, non-attendance and behaviour.”
Her trauma has two parts: the original abuse, and the system’s response to it.
Abused in school and left to manage her own safety. Moved to college where the CSE lead demanded legal evidence of vulnerability and advised raising a complaint if unhappy.
Education refused.
The family placed on formal record as people the reformed services needed protection from.
Even with the highest local political oversight, inside the model the borough says is working well, the institutions protected themselves and each other in practice, while the child was locked into a complaints process whose outcome cannot be publicly shared.
Does that sound like a reformed system, or the old culture still alive and kicking?
#telford #ITCSE #CSE
Telford’s Reforms: Recognition Without Protection Recognition Recorded. Protection Denied.
A mother’s account of what happens when a CSE survivor’s case sits inside Telford’s post-inquiry “reformed” system.
Harm was seen and recorded across every agency.
Protection was never delivered.
Full article here: https://t.co/CGdVspczAk
#CSE #Safeguarding #Telford
https://t.co/LsD5W5iHkN
https://t.co/LsD5W5iHkN
This spoke to me deeply. I have had to heal alone after DV, post relationship abuse, stalking, surveillance, family abandonment, workplace harm, and then years of fighting to protect my daughter after reporting SA against her. Healing while still being wounded by systems that should have protected us has been the hardest thing I have ever done.
So when you speak about women rebuilding themselves in the dark, with nobody truly able to hold what they are carrying, I understand that intimately. Some women are performing extraordinary acts of self-love and survival with no safety net, no witness, and no real support. Thank you for naming them.
@pinkpurple_moon @smileyyyGee @JaydaBF Sadly this is not the case in Telford, post Crowther. We are living proof. There was no racial motive, he is white but they still protected him, punished / blamed her. The exact same playbook, and I have the evidence to prove it.
Six reported crimes in 11 months. She was 14.
Recorded offences (as listed):
1. Sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety (Malicious Communications Act 1988).
2. Taking, making, or distributing indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children.
3. Rape of a child under 16 (indictable).
4. Hate incident
5. Threat to life
6. Harassment/Stalking
What was said on the formal record:
“Yes, my view would be… I think she attracts unwanted attention and doesn’t quite know how to deal with that… and that mum then views that as she’s being sexually harassed.”
“I certainly don’t believe… that we haven’t seen coercive behaviour.”
“She very often likes to have a boyfriend of some sort.”
“This is also a young lady who is very, very active on social media; this isn’t a young lady who is always showing us those levels of anxiety that mum talks about.”
Telford, 2023. Victim-blaming (and parent-blaming) is still alive and well.
And the outcome? Her punishment was the loss of education: pushed out after the first incident in Feb 2022, left without proper provision, and still paying the price of their failures today and they act like that’s acceptable.
Since Labour finds it so difficult to understand:
A child cannot consent.
A child cannot be a prostitute.
A child cannot be ‘asking for it’.
A child is NEVER at fault for the sexual abuse they suffered.
No ifs, ands, or buts.
Her post captures the core problem, we keep having inquiries into grooming, care homes and institutional abuse, but we never touch the mechanism she names, reputation over accountability. Each sector gets its own scandal, report and apology, but the pattern survives intact. If we’re serious, reform has to start with what happens after someone discloses harm, not the press release when it finally hits the news.
Britain once executed people for refusing to conform, and today it still destroys anyone who threatens its image. Grooming scandals. Care homes. Churches. Schools. Social services. The same cover-ups. The pattern is always the same. Protect the institution, silence the victims.
CSE in Telford — the contradiction that matters
Why this matters now
Tomorrow (Thu 13 Nov 2025) Telford & Wrekin Council holds a Full Council meeting to present its third annual CSE report, saying “high-quality information shared between agencies” is driving improvements. Tonight is the moment to set the public record alongside families’ experience.
Since 2023, the Council has issued four CSE updates (three under Leader Cllr Lee Carter) and says it is “one of the only authorities in the country to report on CSE in this way,” with local data it calls “invaluable.” That puts its claims—and families’ experiences—on the public record.
What the Council says (7 Nov 2025, IITCSE PR)
“The benefits of this work are substantial… every authority should be required to take similar action… We have written to Government to play a part in the National Inquiry… We are sharing our learning with the sector, and elements of Telford & Wrekin’s approach form part of Baroness Casey’s recommendations to be adopted at national level.”
What Baroness Casey’s Review calls for
Recommendation 2 urges a look-back: review police and children’s services records over the last ten years to identify children at risk or harmed, with targeted local investigations coordinated nationally.
What happened in practice (documented timeline)
1) 6 Nov 2025 — Stage-2 report in our case: the Council “cannot retrospectively investigate” past safeguarding decisions.
2) 7 Nov 2025 — Telford claims Casey alignment and a model to export.
3) 10 Nov 2025 — Adjudication adopts the non-retrospective stance.
(Supported by complaint correspondence and the Council’s newsroom post.)
What Casey warned against (Foreword)
“Victims are left forgotten… institutions fail to give victims the accountability they seek… public institutions shouldn’t have to be dragged kicking and screaming to review what happened… We should be above resorting to defensiveness and litigation to avoid acknowledging, apologising, and making it right.”
The public-interest point
Documents show Telford’s message, that elements of its approach form part of Baroness Casey’s recommendations to be adopted nationally, appears to conflict with its action in our case, where a retrospective review was refused. That risks skewing the public narrative while cases on the ground are told to “move forward.” “Forward-facing” has functioned as a way to look away from recorded harm and to replace the education owed after CSE and basic survivor recognition (which, for us, arrived three years after the first crime) with a complaints loop and benefits signposting, a failure from start to finish in our case.
From a mother
This is shared in the public interest. We have formal complaints and provided contemporaneous records. The paperwork is real. The harm is recorded. The education is missing. As Casey wrote, “Adults who were victims of abuse as children are still fighting today to be believed.” Our case has been in plain sight.
On paper the Council says it has ‘no remit’ over partner complaints. Yet it is named as advising and supporting a partner outcome last week. If there was capacity to shape that outcome, there was capacity to publish and apply a retrospective-review process when harm was evidenced. That looks like protecting the institution, not a young survivor.
The Council presents itself as part of the national solution. The Casey Review called for look-backs; locally, a look-back was declined. The Casey Review warned against defensiveness; the record shows defensiveness.
Those two realities cannot both be true.
#Telford #CSE #ChildProtection #Safeguarding #BaronessCasey #PublicInterest
@TelfordWrekin @Cllrldcarter @CllrShirleyR @ShaunDaviesMP @Casey_Review
20 July 2022 — The day they said “help is available”
On 20 July 2022, Telford & Wrekin Council posted a public message assuring families that “help and support are available.” That same day, our family’s Child in Need assessment was closed.
The closure record didn’t say the risks had ended. It said the plan was to “support the parent to enforce rules and boundaries” through a Strengthening Families referral. The Council’s own assessment had recorded clear CSE indicators of risk and vulnerability, including coercive and controlling behaviour, emotional distress, and sexual harm. The same document recommended maintaining close school–home communication.
On that same day, the Council’s public post was promoting services for adults, the Holly Project and Base25, both valuable but focused on adult survivors of exploitation, not statutory intervention for a child currently at risk. While the public were told that “help is available,” the system was quietly stepping back from the duty to safeguard a child.
That morning, I had already contacted the school and social worker to report a new incident of abuse, sexual and racial harassment. I received no response, and by 10:30 a.m. I had to chase for even a basic acknowledgement. No one replied.
The police log for that same incident confirms that officers attended, gathered evidence, and noted that a further crime report for malicious communications would be submitted once the systems were back online. The log was then closed with that note. There’s no record of what happened next, only that it would be raised later when systems were available.
At 12pm the same day, a meeting with the social worker had already been scheduled to discuss the assessment and recommendations. But instead of following through with the plan and keeping the case open while new information was emerging, the Local Authority closed the Child in Need plan that very day.
The contradiction couldn’t be clearer.
Publicly, Telford & Wrekin Council was reassuring families that support was available. Privately, it was stepping back from a case with active risk markers, a fresh police log, and ongoing distress and harm. The record shows that what was presented as “empowering a parent to enforce rules” actually meant withdrawing oversight at a critical point, ending formal safeguarding on the same day new concerns were being raised.
That moment marked the start of everything that followed, three and a half years of escalating failures. The same child, left without coordinated support and education. The same agencies, deferring responsibility. The same pattern of victim-blaming, silence, blame, and closed doors.
While Telford told the public it had changed, our experience shows how easily systems can still turn away from the very children those promises were meant to protect.
This was the day they said help is here and the day it disappeared.
🚨ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC CALL🚨
A London woman calls in and cries her eyes out in desperation
"WE'RE NOT RACIST WE'RE PETRIFIED"
"WHAT ARE THESE POLITICIANS DOING TO US. THEY'RE PUTTING EVERYONE IN DANGER"
"I DON'T LEAVE THE HOUSE WITHOUT A MAN"
- My local shop has had 3 stabbings. 1 Murder.
- My friend was murdered last year
- A girl I know was murdered in the park
- I'm begging my son to leave the country
- My cousin was murdered
"OUR FRIENDS. OUR FAMILY ARE DYING"
So sorry, such a beautiful girl and so young. My daughters experince was very similar but was a little older at 14. She's 18 now, and like you said, the authorities will do everything possible to silence cases like these. No education or support, and a long road of healing from the trauma of the abuse and how she was treated by those duty-bound to protect her. I am really so sorry. 😥
If the strategy is to offer another complaint process, help with a PIP application, protect partner agencies, avoid full multi-agency meetings, keep a survivor’s voice off the record, and deny education, then yes, it’s working exactly as designed. But that’s not safeguarding. That’s containment.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.8M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.4M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.4M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.6M followers