Well, there's quite a bit of difference between being ruled by the iron fist of the state without any right to vote at all, and conforming to the hierarchy (i.e., the sacred order) that God established, wherein the husband is the head of the family and, as a free citizen with a secret ballot, makes decisions about how best to preserve a free state for the family under his protection, which includes his wife. That's what we had before women got the vote in this country in the 1920s, and there was nothing communist about it. We would have a much stronger state if only land-owning males 30 years and older had the vote. Even if land-owning females 30 years and older as well had the vote, we'd still have a much stronger state. We'll never have a perfect world nor ever a perfect state until Christ returns to wrap it all up. But I like to think about what might constitute a more perfect state.
I am quite curious as to why you flag my idea here as communist. Communist thinkers (such as Marx) have always had equality of the sexes as one of their main goals in order to push women into the work force and away from their truly vital role as wives and mothers. Marx also thought that women should be held in common--i.e., marriage between one man and one woman should be destroyed.
Are they generating their own electricity, like Trump said for them to do? That just about needs to be put into law because I live in southwest PA, and our electricity prices are ungodly. Frankly, I think our lovely governor is punishing us for voting for Trump with high electric bills and high gas prices, but maybe not. But it seems to me that if the data centers would build their own electrical plants, it could actually help the electricity problem in this country.
Not foaming at the mouth. I've been saying this for years. YEARS. Women don't need to vote. If they're married, the husband should cast the vote for the household, and truth be told, most women vote with their husbands anyway. It's the unmarried ones who tend to vote left wing, from what I've read.
Look at the traditional hymns. They're highly theological in content and have something to teach. The music usually stands up to analysis, too, in terms of the way it's composed. The newer stuff is often self-referential and is on a par with musak. There is sturdy music in all genres, but not all genres fit in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. The new Catholic hymns are weak in every sense of the word, and they are not worthy to be linked with the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. As such, they do not glorify God, specifically as the Victim that lies on the altar.
@ymom83@HHSResponse@SecKennedy Make your own bread. Grow some vegetables. Those are the cheapest parts of eating well at our house. It's the good meat that is prohibitively priced, so we just do the best we can.