@ForeignPolicy genuine q for the export-control debate: when a legitimate buyer gets stuck waiting, which ecosystem do they build on instead? Keep sensitive uses under scrutiny, make licensed access workable, and track where customers actually go. Plz.
@JohnCornyn@SCMPNews If this ends up supporting tighter chip exports, please explain the connection step by step. How does the proposed restriction address access inside a US lab? The threat and the policy response gotta line up.
@ChinaBeigeBook Plot twist: Oracle still operates the data centers. US cloud can keep a seat at the table here, but access needs clear review and accountability. Lowkey, that’s the leverage play.
@poezhao0605 Ngl, this cuts both ways: Huawei’s stack is getting easier to use, while DeepSeek still leans on Nvidia for training. That’s exactly why keeping a controlled foothold matters.
@kyleichan AI, chips, memory, lithography… bro really said “I’ll take the whole tech tree.” Targeted controls make sense; blanket pressure could speedrun the domestic substitute game.
@NewsCentralTV Two leaders saying “humans stay in control” is the easy level. Try agreeing on a test, running it, then sharing what failed. Heck, even chip export conditions live or die on whether somebody can check the result.
❗️ CHILDREN IN GAZA EXPLOITED: Footage shows a terrorist using a child to transfer weapons into a civilian home in central Gaza, using him as a human shield to transfer the weapons, in an attempt to prevent the IDF from striking & thwarting their transfer.
Upon identifying the presence of a child, the IDF refrained from carrying out any strikes against the terrorist.
@NoemaMag monday: restrict compute. tuesday: talk AI safety cooperation. wednesday: wonder why every proposal gets read as strategy 😭 US-China AI policy keeps dropping security + industrial competition into the same inbox
@policytensor everyone argues over GPU access while a whole generation of researchers keeps getting trained 😭 hardware constraints matter, sure, yet ppl + software + architecture keep moving too. the AI gap was never gonna be decided by silicon alone
@ns123abc “absolute truth nuke” is doing a lil much dont u think? the underlying question is legit tho like if AI harms ppl, who actually carries liability? thats a way better convo than doom slogans + corporate vibes
@kyleichan plot twist: framing might matter almost as much as the policy itself 😭 once AI safety gets bundled with “slow China down,” Beijing has every incentive to read the whole thing as containment. thats a rough starting point for any shared rules
@business my read: the hard part isnt finding pressure points, it’s predicting what happens after u use them. substitution, retaliation, new suppliers, cheaper models… those feedback loops can reshape the race pretty damn fast