. @SenMullin keeps saying he “would love” the best relationship with the Iranian people and wants to see a return to pre‑1979 relations, while insisting he is still “waiting” for a leader to emerge. With genuine respect, I have to ask how closely he is actually listening to Iranians.
In the past months, hundreds of thousands of Iranians in the diaspora have filled the streets of Munich, Berlin, Toronto, Los Angeles and beyond, many of them openly rallying around @PahlaviReza as the figure they see as a transitional leader. Inside Iran, students and protesters have risked prison, torture and death while chanting his name and calling for an end to this regime. Those are not abstract signals; they are an unmistakable, sustained demand for a specific path forward.
So when Senator Mullen says he is still “waiting” for a leader, it raises a serious question: whose voices is he actually hearing? Lobby groups and exiled factions with no real base like NIAC and NCRI, or the real people in Iran and in the streets worldwide who have already chosen the person they want to guide a democratic transition? If the goal is to stand with the Iranian people, then it is time to acknowledge the leadership they themselves are affirming, rather than pretending it does not exist. @POTUS@SecRubio@marklevinshow #rezapahlavi
London based Iranian commentator Ali Alizadeh, a UK resident who openly aligns with the IRGC, is caught on video fantasizing about terror attacks on Dubai, collective punishment of families, and mass killing inside Iran. A group of Iranians is now preparing a legal complaint against him under UK public order and incitement laws. This is not a PR slip; it is the regime’s ideology. It does not operate by Western moral standards, and it does not change because of a piece of paper. As Mark Levin has argued, an ‘agreement’ with a regime like this is not peace, it is surrender to an ideology that proudly sees itself fighting until Judgment Day. @marklevinshow@potus@SecRubio
I just came across this segment and I am livid.
With full respect to @potus and @BillOReilly. I have to push back on what this NIAC aligned “expert” is selling. O’Reilly says he spoke to Trump and that the president’s main concern about striking IRGC targets is Ramadan optics and images of “dead Persians,” and this guy enthusiastically agrees.
So let me get this straight: the president can tell Iranians “help is on the way,” then watch tens of thousands be killed, jailed, or terrorized by this regime, and we are not supposed to see that as a public image problem. But finally targeting the men who ordered those massacres during Ramadan would somehow be unacceptable?
He even calmly claims that “during the 12 day war there were no protests,” as if that proves Iranians did not care. There were no protests because people were terrified. This regime shoots protesters in the streets, blinds them, jails and tortures them, executes them.
And look at who is saying this. He built his career in the NIAC ecosystem and now at a DC policy shop, always pushing the same line: no serious military pressure, revive or “improve” the nuclear deal, open the door to oil and gas business with Tehran, and let Washington walk away with a “better deal” while the same killers stay in power.
This is not protecting Iranians. And it is certainly not protecting American national security or interests. It is asking Republicans to worry more about how Tehran will spin the images than about stopping a regime that murders its own people and threatens Americans and our allies. #IranMassacre @marklevinshow@LindseyGrahamSC@SecRubio
Good morning 🌤
Here is my entry for the @worldofwomennft#ArtfestSpring2023
Her name is Luna, the Goddess of Nova Gaia ✨
🌑🌘🌗🌖🌕🌔🌓🌒🌑
Thank you for the opportunity to create 🤍