"The people in charge of our country are idiots... and they treat our money like they found it in a sack by the river and they've gotta spend it before someone finds out"
- Dave Hughes
👏👏👏
Ill go one further.
No flights on the tax payer.
No hotels or “second homes” on the tax payer.
No food and beverage on the tax payer.
No car service/taxi on the tax payer.
Conduct your meetings via video conference like you forced the nation to do from 2020-2024 until the national debt is in a good place.
We can brand this with a catchy ad slogan to.
“Save the nation money, reduce it’s debt, and work from home. Do your bit, for our future”
Send the video to everyone you know showing how heinously Nowak was treated by the police in his dying moments and how the police cravenly kowtowed to his murderer.
Legacy mainstream media, same ones who wrote about George Floyd millions of times, are dead silent about Nowak.
The bodycam footage of Henry Nowak has just been released.
An 18-year-old who was stabbed FIVE TIMES called the police for help.
His attacker told officers Henry was a racist.
So they handcuffed the victim.
Henry told them over and over:
"I've been stabbed."
"I can't breathe."
"Please brother, I can't breathe."
An officer responded: "You've been stabbed, mate? I don't think you have."
Henry died in handcuffs.
The mainstream media has said NOTHING.
Where is the same outrage from when George Floyd died?
Watch this footage. Share it everywhere.
Pray for Henry’s family.
🚨BREAKING: Henry Nowak's father speaks out on the murder of his son:
"He told officers he could not breathe NINE TIMES, he said he had been stabbed FOUR TIMES, but the officer replied saying' 'I don't think you have, mate.'"
What a brave man.
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
Labor’s budget is a national disgrace and Jim Chalmers has zero shame.
Labor didn't have the guts to field a candidate in Farrer and has no no clue what everyday Aussies are furious about.
Massive deficits, $1 TRILLION in gross debt next year, $77 BILLION in new taxes, inflation heading to 7%… yet they still lecture young people about “helping” them into homes while interest rates climb to 10%?
They’re deaf to the anger over immigration, integration and people who refuse to speak our language or accept Australian values.
They’re addicted to net-zero handouts and renewable scams while ignoring our own resources. Last night proved exactly why voters have had enough.
Here’s the good news: One Nation just delivered a political earthquake.
We smashed it in South Australia and won the seat of Farrer, our first ever House of Representatives seat. The protest party myth is dead.
One Nation WILL take Australia back for the majority. We WILL put the next generation first. We WILL end the age of reckless spending, open borders and bribing voters.
The message from Farrer is loud: Australians want their country back. Welcome to the team, David Farley for Farrer. Let’s get to work
Is there any other industry where you can blatantly lie to get your job, not fulfil what you promised when you are in the job, then spin it in a way to say you are actually HELPING the people that voted you in for that job (that you lied to to get in) other than Politics?
I mean............
CELINE-2 ESAFETY-0
MY RESPONSE.
It's been a crazy week. I just wanted to give my two cents on the aftermath of my Federal Court win, the media coverage and what we can do.
My case sets a precedent for what Australians can and can't see online. This case proves at the FEDERAL level that our online safety regulator routinely acts outside her legal powers, and I would like to see some actual change come out of this.
eSafety relies on what they call "informal notices" to get content removed online.
To put it simply, these are takedown notices dressed up as informal notices. Often sent to a social media company's legal team, they are an illegal tactic used by eSafety to pressure social media companies to remove content that they deem "harmful," even if it does not meet the requirements under the Online Safety Act.
My case definitively proves that eSafety staff knowingly send these informal notices when they are fully aware that the content does not meet the requirements to be censored.
That is why this case matters.
Share this video, and my case, far and wide to any and all politicians as this affects everyone regardless of whether you're left, right, middle, whatever.
Australia does not need to be censored by an unelected WEF puppet.
Sack Julie-Inman Grant.
🇦🇺♥️
This is fucken insane. The economic illiteracy of Labornomics has reached a new high with the cost of a new carpet for the Australian Greens party room in Parliament exceeding $50,000. How the fuck can you preside over this shambles @AlboMP, in the middle of a cost of living crisis, while claiming your government is responsibly managing the economy ?
The Prime Minister says that we have to lower the temperature of our public discourse. True. So let’s stop adding to the tensions; in particular, by scaling immigration way down, at least until infrastructure and social cohesion can catch up. That means weaning language schools and universities off overseas students as their business model. It means weaning business off importing foreign workers rather than training and paying locals. It means a welfare system without the something-for-nothing mindset; one that insists that all younger people, at least those without major disabilities, will work; preferably for a wage, but otherwise for their dole.
But it doesn’t just mean much lower numbers, it also means a much greater stress on Australian values, with tougher citizenship test, background checks, security vetting, plus a longer probationary period before permanent residency becomes citizenship.
Read my latest at The Tony Abbott Newsletter: https://t.co/pYpb7bjX4X
According to the ex-NSW Senior Trade and Investment Commissioner for Japan and Korea, Michael Newman:
🇦🇺 Australia has 140 public servants to every 1,000 people
🇯🇵 Japan has 38 per 1,000 people.
🇦🇺 Employs 2.5 million bureaucrats, costing us $232 billion a year.
🇯🇵 Has five times our population, runs on 3.3 million bureaucrats and spends only $270 billion.
🇦🇺 17 per cent of the working age population is now on the government payroll.
🇯🇵 Just five per cent.
🇦🇺 Bureaucrats are on bigger salaries too. Per head, Aussie public servants earn an average of $93,000 versus Japan at just $76,000.
🇦🇺 At the senior executive level, federal heads of department are raking in up to $1,000,000 Aussie dollars a year.
🇯🇵 To compare with Japan, the top earning politicians in the Asian archipelago bring home about $255,000.
Mr Newman sensibly suggested that senior civil servants should be paid like private sector professionals, with a smaller base salary with performance-based rewards.
As Thomas Sowell said "It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong."
This is what many of us have been trying to tell the coalition for so long.
Instead of listening to us they jumped down the Teal pit, trying to appease the uber rich, and comfortable.
They turned their back on everyone else.
Barnaby puts it perfectly - watch this.
Once again the same excuses and diversions are being made for not dealing with the issue of Islamic extremist radicalisation in Australia. This is not about blame for December 14 - that is a straw man argument - but an honest appeal for what is needed to prevent such radicalisation in the future.
Hollow appeals for unity mean nothing if they are used as an excuse for not confronting or acting on how radicalisation is occurring in Australia.
This is as true of extremist Islam as it is for all other forms of political radicalisation, whether on the right or left, which is also present in Australia. We must stop avoiding the issue and work productively and honestly to address this issue for the sake of all faiths to make a positive and peaceful contribution. If not now after December 14, then when!
Message from Bob Katter from FB:
“This beggars belief! We now face the very real prospect of Canberra-based bureaucrats deciding whether I’ve made a "hate statement" or whether I haven’t.
Canberra: a place so out-of-touch it voted over 60% FOR the Voice, while over 60% of the rest of Australia voted AGAINST it. If you ever needed proof that this place does not reflect the real world, well, there it is. Clear as day.
And it doesn’t stop there.
They’re pushing overarching legislation that gives bureaucrats the power to tell YOU what you can and can’t say (on top of legislation that passed just before Christmas that dictates what you can or can't do in your own backyard).
A group of paper-pushers, whose shoe leather has never touched anything but concrete pavement, will likely have the power to decide whether you can attend a rally or recite the Bible... this is on top of telling you whether you cut down a tree, plant a tree, or do any number of things on your own property.
Well, I’ll tell you right now: this is not freedom. This won't stop Bondi from reoccurring. This is not common sense. And it’s not Australia as we know it.
I’ll be standing up against these powers every step of the way.
Because once they control "your backyard", they control your life. And we know what kind of society that is.”
Media Release: One Nation to oppose Labor's rushed hate Bill
Labor’s proposed law to combat antisemitism could see a person jailed for up to five years for saying Australia’s the greatest country in the world.
One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson said Labor’s Bill, to be debated at an early sitting of Parliament next week, would be an unworkable mess.
“We don’t need new laws to protect Australians from antisemitism,” Senator Hanson said.
“We need to enforce existing laws, something the Albanese government – to its eternal shame – didn’t do to protect Jewish Australians from antisemitism.
“This bill has been very rushed, with only a day or so allowed for Parliamentary debate and a snap Senate committee inquiry that’s barely hours long. I’m reminded of the many changes made to legislation to address the problem of immigration detainees, and how Labor repeatedly got it wrong. I have no confidence this legislation – which amends the criminal code along with 15 other laws and eight regulations, and throws in a $1 billion gun buyback – will be any better. It will be a mess. Australians could be stripped of their freedom of speech and opinion, and their ability to express pride in their culture and nationality.
“This bill is fraught with all sorts of potential unintended consequences, which is always what happens when you use subjective language in legislation that is open to differing interpretations. For example, you could even go to prison for saying Australia’s the best country in the world because it could be interpreted as ‘disseminating ideas of superiority’.
“One Nation is going to oppose this bill. We will not support punishing law-abiding firearm owners as a scapegoat for Anthony Albanese’s failure to check rising antisemitism; we already have the toughest gun laws in the world.
“We will not support a vaguely-worded law that could put Australians in jail for making a patriotic statement. I very much fear Australia is heading down a path where we become like the United Kingdom, where police come to people’s homes and take them to jail for a social media post. I know Albanese would love that, because he’s so terrified of free speech, but One Nation will not stand for it.
“One Nation is prepared to act decisively to protect Australians from radical Islamic terrorism, but this isn’t the way. I call on all of my fellow members of Parliament to oppose this legislation until we can get it right.”
Prime Minister Albanese refused to say three words while calling his Royal Commission:
Radical. Islamic. Terrorism.
A Royal Commission about what happened in Bondi will be a waste unless the real problem is addressed. The Prime Minister won’t even say the problem out loud.
Let’s be clear, on December 14 two radical Islamic terrorists murdered 15 innocent Jewish Australians in an ISIS inspired hate filled attack.
A proper Royal Commission should be investigating how radical Islam has been allowed to flourish in Australia.
We have to look at who we have been bringing into this country for the past 30 years. Are the people we are bringing into the country today going to assimilate with western culture or seek to tear our country apart?
The Burqa, a tool of islamic extremist oppression, should be banned in Australia. Instead, the government lets hate preachers in mosques go unpunished and allows radical Islam to grow in Australia.
The Royal Commission should be looking at the governments policy on immigration, citizenship and stamping out radical islamic extremists.
The terms of reference released for the Bondi Royal Commission fail to do any of this.
The Prime Minister should be condemned for his failures that will put more Australians in danger in the future.