@TheHoopHerald Good example how traditional mechanics can be adjusted to compete with the deep 3 by lowering your start point and carrying the momentum through to the release.
@TraMurr2@omarbustamove First two clips and he is standing facing the wrong direction in both. So you can see why Kerr feels a way. No you could argue super elite players like Kawhi can use this stance but not 95pecent players
@digijordan Big fan. You cannot use entanglement to send information. A physical photon must be sent. Most science communicators do a bad job of relaying what’s actually happening in quantum physics.
@Foxhound2931@ValZimmer2@dr_andrealove The answer is a very clear no for anyone that’s does any reading. OP is a phd so she is smart enough to say “data points” instead of studies. You Eric are just talking without knowing a thing.
NBC today blasted @realDonaldTrump and @RobertKennedyJr for wanting to study a possible connection between "autism and childhood vaccines" because NBC claims it has been "debunked" by "hundreds of studies."** But has it? The answer is unmistakably "no!" Here is the proof:
Most parents with autistic children claim vaccines - including DTaP, Hep B, Hib, PCV13, and IPV, each injected 3 times by 6 months of age - are a cause of their child’s autism.* Yet the studies to support that these vaccines do not cause autism have not been conducted.
In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in which it ordered federal health authorities (HHS) to study whether pertussis vaccine can cause autism due to parental complaints regarding same. https://t.co/mfBSiw7tVr
In 1991, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued its report on this question and could not find a single study on the question of whether pertussis vaccine causes autism. Meaning, the science had not been done. https://t.co/rXZ40DsnKU
In 2012, the IOM was again commissioned to study whether pertussis vaccine can cause autism, this time by CDC, and also the question of whether tetanus and diphtheria vaccines can cause autism (DTaP), and again the IOM could not find a single study to support the claim that these vaccines do not cause autism. Not one. But it did find one study supporting that DTaP vaccine is correlated with autism but threw it out since it was based on VAERS data. https://t.co/SskiFSsE1Y
In 2018, I deposed the world's leading vaccinologist about the 2012 finding by the IOM and while admitting there are no studies to support that these vaccines do not cause autism, he said he would nonetheless tell parents these vaccines do not cause autism even though he has no evidence to support that claim. https://t.co/I3zTmbQybj
In 2019, we sued CDC for the studies it claims support that the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism. CDC finally identified 20 studies: 18 of those studied a different vaccine (MMR) or an ingredient not in these vaccines (thimerosal), and one irrelevant study looked at antigens. Incredibly, the final study CDC identified was the 2012 IOM review that found no studies supporting that DTaP doesn’t cause autism. https://t.co/6fwze6pgkv
In 2020, in a lawsuit specifically about vaccines and autism, I depose one the world's leading vaccinologists on this topic and she admitted under oath that there were no studies to support that vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism. https://t.co/3bR5l3QllB
This is why actually studying whether vaccines cause autism is important: https://t.co/LDK7SapdAw
While CDC claims that vaccines do not cause autism, despite demanding the studies to support this claim for the vaccines given in the first six months of life, and asking, suing, deposing, etc., for them for years, we still have not received a single such study.
But NBC doesn't really care about the facts or data, rather it just repeats the dogmatic claim that "vaccines do not cause autism" like a mantra. https://t.co/DELXa99osy
One final thought: given the lack of studies regarding vaccines and autism – the issue CDC and "health" authorities claimed to have most thoroughly studied – imagine the state of the "science" with regard to the 100 other serious harms (often immune or immune-mediated disorders) parents claim are caused by vaccines. (For more meat on that bone watch Episode 388: https://t.co/x1AT9mQy9j)
*https://t.co/bznPAqZEwy; https://t.co/74e1IEPxtj; https://t.co/gwhKiYXitL; https://t.co/dYIAWwuwzW.
**https://t.co/DELXa99osy
@everyonecalmdwn@TheUfoJoe Exactly. So if they jam comms in the area and they are still up, they are controlled by on board AI. Is it preprogrammed AI? Is it performing evasive maneuvers? While being jammed. That has huge implications.
@everyonecalmdwn@TheUfoJoe If the military was actively deploying their anti drone measures in the area you wouldnt be able to do this as your signal would be jammed.
Pfizer board member, @ScottGottliebMD, you look foolish attacking @RobertKennedyJr on CNBC (links to clips below) because it’s clear you lack basic knowledge regarding vaccines. For example:
--Your claim that in “early 2000s … FDA reformulate[d] the existing MMR vaccine to take some of the preservatives out,” is false. Never happened. You are likely thinking about the removal of thimerosal in the early 2000s from various vaccines but as even CDC explains, “Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal.” https://t.co/iTY7OH4hqW
--Your claim that a child “can’t get vaccinated [for MMR] until age 2” is simply false. MMR is routinely given at one year of age and sometimes even earlier. https://t.co/MW3i33Djbo
--Your claims regarding pertussis vaccines nonsensically ignore the fact that these products do not prevent transmission of the pertussis bacteria – they only provide, at best, personal protection. As a recent consensus paper of industry pertussis vaccine “experts” explained, “aPVs [pertussis vaccine] … cannot avoid infection and transmission. … aPV pertussis vaccines do not prevent colonization. Consequently, they do not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and do not exert any herd immunity effect.” https://t.co/nlLg6dqvaJ
--Your claims regarding polio nonsensically ignore the fact that the last wild case of polio in the U.S. was in 1979 and that the only polio vaccine used in the U.S. for the last 24 years only provides, at best, personal protection and does not prevent transmission of the polio virus. As CDC explains: “IPV [inactivated polio vaccine] … does not stop transmission of the virus.” https://t.co/PmgbMEUZnn
--You claimed that “we [Pfizer] don’t make the pediatric vaccines, Pfizer is not in that market” to deflect the claim that, as a board member of Pfizer, you have a serious conflict of interest in attacking RFK Jr. regarding pediatric vaccines. But, as you no doubt know, Pfizer does sell pediatric vaccines, including the Prevnar vaccine given to babies at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of age, which was one of Pfizer’s top three selling products in 2023. https://t.co/55luhUOK3O claim is either a lie or reveals deep ignorance.
--Your claim regarding measles mortality is based on dubious and unreliable data and ignores the facts that (1) approximately 400 people total died annually in the U.S. in the years before the first measles vaccine in 1963 (amounting to around 1 death for every 500,000 Americans), and (2) mortality from measles declined by over 98% from 1900 to 1960 before the vaccine and was continuing to decline. https://t.co/vNmbpUfigF. In any event, you dutifully ignore the fact that RFK Jr. has made clear he has no intention of taking away vaccines from anyone who wants them.
--You claim RFK Jr. will cost lives, but I would argue that ignorance regarding vaccine products does and has cost lives. I welcome a public debate in which we can discuss the number of lives ignorance about vaccines has cost versus your speculations about those RFK Jr. will supposedly cause (a man who has actually devoted his life to saving the lives of children).
Your knowledge regarding these products is only matched by your track record as a public “health” official. The plummeting decline in childhood health from the early 1980s (from less than 13% with chronic disease to now well over 50%) continued unabated while you were FDA commissioner. Respectfully, you lack authority or a track record, let alone basic knowledge, to speak on the subjects you address in this interview (let alone to discuss this topic with Senators to dissuade them from confirming RFK Jr.)
If you were being honest, you would reveal that your real concern, as a board member of Pfizer, is that Pfizer's golden gooses – Covid-19 vaccines, Prevnar vaccines, RSV vaccines, etc. – will have to face the reality of the devastating harms they have caused to families across America. Your interview stinks of self-interest. The time for selling out America's children so pharma and its leaders, like you, can line their pockets has come to an end.
The above responds to a recent CNBC segment on which you recently appeared and which you tweeted out in two parts:
https://t.co/plgnR9TpWk
https://t.co/plgnR9TpWk
@AlastairMcA30 That’s because literally none of you are doing any critical thinking. You’re letting big pharma do it for you. You almost certainly know nothing about the science .
.@AaronSiriSG: "We FOIA'ed the FDA w/ a simple request. Provide all the clinical trials relied upon to license the flu shot for pregnant women...They finally admitted we don't have any clinical trials because it's never been licensed for pregnant women."
@michaelpollan RFK vaccine position is to increase the level of scientific standard. Any justification for the vaccine schedule currently would fall under public health. Which is what they say when they don’t have the science.