August

Adult human male, #GayNotQueer. I promise not all young people are fucking idiots! 🏳️‍🌈

[Dr. Dame Katy Denise CH GBE 🏳️‍⚧️🇳🇬🪑 @damekatydenise_]

Polite reminder that Dr Crippen has monetised her account & posts rage bait to get your clicks & comments in order to pay off her Klarna bill. Don’t respond to her, just screenshot if you want to ridicule her.

I can’t believe someone would spend their time pretending to be a doctor spouting inflammatory nonsense online.

[GB News @GBNEWS]

Sadiq Khan told by Muslim author to 'take proper choice and put Islam first' after supporting LGBT Pride events

https://t.co/9y7qPclgwI

[Seán Ako 🇮🇪 @TheAkoFiles]

The alliance between LGBT activists and Islam was always going to end the same way.

Some of us were just rude enough to point it out before it happened. The real world is the biggest bigot of them all.

[Claire Coutinho @ClaireCoutinho]

Suella, it is undeniable that it has been Conservatives, me and @NJ_Timothy , who have led the fight against the Islamophobia definition (if you listen that is the point I make below). This is going to be as bad for policing as the Race Action Plan.

It is also undeniable that Kemi has led the charge against Critical Race Theory.

She was doing it back when it was hard and unpopular. You know that. Everybody knows it. Nigel is on the record praising her for it.

But now you are putting out ads suggesting she supported Black Lives Matter when she led the fight against that movement. It is a despicable lie, it’s beneath you, and you know it.

[Claire Coutinho @ClaireCoutinho]

Narinder is proving my exact point.

Is it wrong for me to say we should not assume racism is the problem, but we should look for the evidence?

Is it wrong to say we should be driven by facts not ideology when considering health or crime or education?

What a mad response.

[Simon Hoare MP @Simon4NDorset]

At “best” Jenrick is a political chameleon. Others words beginning with C might also be appropriate. I still remember him begging for my vote in the leadership (he called me on the day of the last MPs round) when he described Kemi as being too of the right & he was the moderate

[Andy Ngo @MrAndyNgo]

You called for riots in all 50 states in my country after George Floyd died.

Dozens of people died in those far-left riots you encouraged.

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

This is wrong. It doesn't matter who you vote for, but Kemi Badenoch expressly stated that ALL lives matter and it shouldn't be about someone's race. This sort of "attack ad" isn't about facing up to important issues, it's just a lie.

[Wes Streeting @wesstreeting]

I’m not going to amplify Reform’s ad by sharing it, but the wilful misrepresentation of Kemi Badenoch - selectively quoting what she said about ‘white lives matter’ - is disgraceful and dangerous.

It needs to be challenged, including by those of us who are not Conservatives.

[Nick Timothy MP @NJ_Timothy]

The murder of Henry Nowak shows how law enforcement is corrupted by political correctness.

And it's far from the only case.

We need to dismantle the whole structure of identity politics - and return us to equality before the law.

[Chris Philp MP @CPhilpOfficial]

In Parliament today: I expose an official national police policy, published in March 2025, requiring police forces to treat different ethnic groups differently.

This is immoral, divisive and dangerous

We cannot have two-tier policing

The Home Secretary should ensure this policy is ended right now

#Justice #EqualityBefore #TheLaw #PoliceAccountability #UKPolitics #PublicSafety #Accountability #Parliament #HomeSecretary

[Claire Coutinho @ClaireCoutinho]

@Ed_Miliband @CBItweets The report explicitly says it is not the view of the CBI.

It was in fact funded by a green lobby think tank backed one of Labour’s biggest donors: Quadrature Capital.

How convenient that it says what Ed wants it to.

[Free Speech Shell @FreespeechShell]

The police failed me for 16 months whilst my perpetrator carried out crime. They actively ignored my pleas because they were regularly accused of racism by him. The one time my husband asked for help and wrote to the Imam at the mosque politely for intervention he was arrested at 7am infront of my 3 year old son and labelled as racist. I was left at home living next door to a man who had already attacked my house with a sword and got away with just criminal damage.

[A True Liberal 🇬🇧 🏳️‍🌈 @MInthenow70635]

Pride month has been entirely co-opted by the trans and 'queer' movements.

As a gay man, I cannot participate in a month that celebrates repackaged homophobia.

[Harman Singh Kapoor @kingkapoor72]

Family members of fucking Digwa called the grieving family of Henry Nowak, racist in the courtroom after the verdict.

[Kemi Badenoch @KemiBadenoch]

They are no longer the Labour Party, they are the Welfare Party. It doesn’t matter who is in charge of these people, the party for Benefits Street will tax us all into poverty to pay for more welfare.

Pat McFadden has said in private what he and the Prime Minister deny in public. As I’ve said repeatedly, Labour MPs don’t understand where money comes from. They think our taxes are their money to spend, rather than the result of the hard work of the people in our country who deserve so much better.

The Conservative party is the only party holding Labour to account, as Reform, Lib Dems the SNP and others join Labour in demanding the state pay more and more benefits.

[Katie Lam @Katie_Lam_MP]

Henry Nowak's murder was horrific. His killer, Vickrum Digwa, stabbed him to death for no reason.

But when the police arrived at the scene, it was Henry that they put in handcuffs, while he lay dying.

Digwa accused Henry of racism - and the police uncritically believed him.

This is the latest example, and one of the most blatant, of the so-called “anti-racist” ideology which now influences the behaviour of so many people within our institutions. The cost of these dangerous ideas can be measured in lives; they must be rooted out and totally destroyed.

The facts in Henry Nowak's case are particularly shocking. Henry was a student at the University of Southampton; he was just 18 years old. He was walking home from a night out, back in December.

On his way home, he crossed paths with Vickrum Digwa. Digwa then stabbed him five times with his kirpan – the ceremonial knife carried by many Sikhs. In Digwa's case, that knife was 8 inches long.

Digwa later tried to claim that he had acted in self-defence – that Henry had been drunk, and that he had carried out a racist attack against Digwa.

But last week, Digwa was convicted of murder. The court identified that Henry hadn't even drunk enough to cross the drunk driving limit. Digwa's allegations of racism were also found to be unfounded – they were described as a “wicked lie” in the trial.

Yet, when they were called to the scene, Hampshire Police handcuffed Henry, not Digwa.

They immediately and uncritically believed Digwa's claim that Henry was racist. They handcuffed him, while he lay dying. Henry told the police that he had been stabbed, but they didn't listen. His last words were “I can't breathe”.

Why did the police immediately believe Digwa's claims of racism? Why didn't they listen to Henry when he told them that he'd been stabbed? Why do Hampshire Police continue to deny that their officers were in the wrong? Why won't they release the bodycam footage of the incident?

It's hard not to imagine that, if the roles had been reversed, the institutional response to Henry Nowak's murder would have been completely different.

An investigation by the regulator that reviews police conduct, the IOPC, is ongoing. The officers involved should be held accountable for uncritically believing an accusation of racism. It is not the job of the police to handcuff anyone and everyone accused of racism, no questions asked. That is madness.

But accountability must extend beyond those individual officers. Their decisions were influenced, and enabled, by a set of ideas which now dominate many of our institutions. This includes the idea that avoiding racism, or the perception of racism, is more important than keeping people safe.

In so many institutions, including the police, “anti-racism” is drilled into people from the beginning of their careers. If people are perceived as racist, they can be struck off, punished, or denied promotion. Training materials often contain advice on how to treat particular ethnic, racial, or religious groups, to avoid accusations of racism. In the police in particular, many forces employ liaison officers, or police associations, designed to represent particular minority groups.

Rules and guidelines that inform how public servants act are dominated by this kind of thinking. Sometimes, these guidelines are even made into law – meaning that public servants can get into legal trouble if they make a decision which seems to disproportionately impact one group.

These practices are, in turn, the product of the belief that certain groups are oppressors, and others oppressed. The oppressed groups must be afforded special treatment and protections. Rather than applying a single set of rules to every individual, equally and fairly, many of our institutions now believe that they have a mandate to “maintain relations” and “manage tensions” between groups, and to control public perception of groups considered “oppressed”. The need to keep the public safe, or administer our rules consistently, or even to tell the truth, is subjugated to the cause of “anti-racism”.

This is exactly the same institutional approach which led so many people to cover up the rape and grooming gangs which preyed on so many children, for so many years.

Most of the offenders in those cases were Muslim men, either from Pakistan or of Pakistani heritage. Most of the victims were white.

In most cases, police forces, local authorities and care providers either turned a blind eye to this abuse, or actively tried to cover it up.

In her rapid review into the grooming gangs, Baroness Casey said outright: "we found many examples of organisations avoiding the topic altogether for fear of appearing racist, raising community tensions, or causing community cohesion problems."

In other words, the British state covered up the worst crime committed in this country, ever, because people were scared of appearing racist.

These two instances are far from unique.

On June 13th 2023, Valdo Calocane stabbed two university students to death, and then did the same to a school caretaker. He then drove a van into a nearby bus stop.

He'd been known to authorities for years. In May 2020, he tried to break into a neighbour's flat during a psychotic episode. He wasn't sectioned because NHS professionals were told to consider the "over-representation of young black males in detention".

Had Calocane been dealt with properly, he would likely never have gone on his killing spree. He clearly posed a risk to the public. And yet, once again, a fear of being branded racist trumped our right to be kept safe.

In 2022, the IOPC said that police forces should reduce the use of ‘stop and search’ because the practice is disproportionately used on ethnic minorities.

Never mind the fact that stop and search saves lives (including those of ethnic minorities!), and takes weapons off the streets.

On, and on, and on. Earlier this year, West Midlands Police lied to the public about its handling of the match between Maccabi Tel Aviv and Aston Villa. Its recommendation to bar Maccabi fans from Birmingham was driven entirely by pressure from Muslims in Birmingham. Broader public interest in the match didn't matter – the only question was how to avoid offending Muslims, many of whom objected to the presence of Israeli fans.

And just last week, a whistleblower from West Yorkshire Police revealed that she'd been sacked from her role as chairman of a “hate crime” panel when she questioned whether the force should be spending so much time on policing people who made offensive comments about Muslims or Islam.

These are the real world consequences of this moral crusading. People have died. Many thousands more have been horrifically abused, groomed, and raped. Our ability to express ourselves freely is being restricted.

A single set of rules must apply uniformly, to everyone. Institutions like the police should go back to focusing exclusively on keeping the public safe. Nobody's life should ever be put in danger, and nobody's freedoms should ever be restricted, because a public servant is scared of being called racist.

We must not rest until these dangerous ideas have been totally booted out of the British state.

[Normal Gay Psychiatrist @NormalGayPsych]

Repost if you are a gay person who will NOT be participating in Pride month. Let's make a statement.

[Miss Jo @therealmissjo]

Unbelievable.

Simply unbelievable verdict yesterday.

What is happening in Belgium?

On April 2, 2024 during the Easter Holidays a 14 year old girl went to the fairground with her 16 year old boyfriend in West Flanders, Belgium.

Afterwards, he invited her to go to the woods with him where he raped her.

Little did she know that he had invited his friends and that not only did they watch but after the rape, he “loaned her out” to his friends and they took turns in raping her too.

She screamed and was “in obvious pain” according to one of the boys but they did not stop. In total 9 boys aged between. 11 years old and 16 years old put her through a terrifying ordeal.

The boys were not named but were reporting as being “of North African or Somali descent”, with the boyfriend being from Somalia.

The rape was filmed and disseminated on Snapchat, tormenting the girl yet further.

The juveniles were tried and the verdict was delivered yesterday, 29 May 2026.

The 9 boys were found guilty of “repeated gang rape with aggravating circumstances and violating the victim’s sexual integrity”.

Their punishment? Hardly anything.

No custodial sentence was imposed - as Belgium instead prefers to focus on re-education and “guidance”. There is the possibility of a payment to the girl but this has not been disclosed.

[Seán Ako 🇮🇪 @TheAkoFiles]

Remember, don’t fall for a single word of it.