VCs are world-class at saying “NO” without saying no. The greatest hits:
1) I liked it, my partners didn’t → If they had conviction, they’d fight.
I2) f you get a lead, we’ll follow → Translation: zero conviction, waiting to piggyback.
3) Show traction and we’ll invest → Even with traction, they’ll ghost. Filter, not promise.
4) We love co-investing → Sometimes true. Often hedge. Check their history.
5) We’re backing the team → Until they replace you.
6) I’ll dedicate time → They’re on 7 boards. Good luck.
7) Can my associate join board meetings? → Smart kid ≠ the partner you thought you got.
8) Vanilla term sheet → “Standard” usually means “founder-unfriendly.”
9) We can open doors → Intros ≠ revenue.
10) We like early stage → Check the portfolio. If they haven’t touched seed in years, you’re not getting a check.
Most founders don’t actually want to run a $50M company. They just think they’re supposed to.
In reality, many are 0→1 builders.
They love solving problems, shipping features, hearing from customers. They’re happiest with a 3–10 person team and $1–3M ARR.
But they force themselves into the “scale CEO” role, managing 50+ people, sitting in planning meetings, delegating all the work they enjoy.
Result? Misery and burnout.
The happiest founders I know build small SaaS, exit, then do it again. Some are on their 2nd or 3rd.
There’s no shame in being that person.
In fact, it might be the smarter play.
Crypto was supposed to cut out middlemen.
Now middlemen are building the rails.
Visa settles in USDC.
PayPal prints its own dollar.
BlackRock tokenizes funds.
The vision was open networks.
What we’re getting are corporate chains.
This isn’t about banks vs crypto.
It’s about who owns the rails.
Because whoever owns the rails owns the future of money.
And right now, it doesn’t look like us.
#crypto #decentralisation #Bitcoin
The most twisted #SaaS model?
It doesn’t profit when you succeed. It profits when you fail.
Most founders think SaaS means building productivity tools: pay monthly, cancel anytime. That’s the kindergarten version.
The advanced play is enforcement SaaS:
software built to monetize mistakes.
Fullerton, CA is the case study.
Before outsourcing parking enforcement: $33K/month in fines.
After a SaaS vendor took over: $101K/month. A +206% jump.
Not efficiency. Not better service. Just software turning human error into recurring revenue.
Why it works:
Long-term contracts with governments.
Negative churn: citizens can’t cancel tickets.
Extreme lock-in: once deployed, it never gets replaced.
That’s why Conduent makes $600M+ annually.
That’s why T2 Systems sold for $735M.
The lesson for founders:
The strongest SaaS moats aren’t built on what people want to buy.
They’re built where people have no choice.
Can You Build a Startup While Working a Full-Time Job?
YES.
Here’s the no-fluff version:
- Solve a problem you actually feel. No need to “validate” what’s obvious.
- 6–8am is gold. That’s when the work gets done.
- Cut scope ‘til it fits in a weekend. Then cut again.
- Ship ugly. Feedback > polish.
- One user. One metric. One scary next step.
- Skip the pitch deck. Ship product.
You don’t need 40 free hours a week.
You need 10 focused ones and ... a problem that keeps you up anyway.
Momentum beats motivation. Every time.
The most dangerous #SaaS model isn’t built on usage.
It’s built on failure.
Most SaaS founders dream of happy users. Sign-ups, retention, NPS.
But there’s a darker side of SaaS: enforcement software.
It doesn’t profit when you succeed.
It profits when you screw up.
Take parking enforcement.
Fullerton, California outsourced its ticketing to a SaaS vendor.
Before software: $33K in monthly fines.
After software: $101K.
That’s a 206% jump not from demand, but from mistakes.
This model flips the playbook:
- Revenue without demand. No one wants a ticket, yet everyone pays.
- Negative churn. Users can’t cancel their own errors. Volume grows with population, not satisfaction.
- Permanent lock-in. Once embedded in city systems, governments rarely switch.
Enforcement SaaS is capitalism’s strangest trick: turning human error into recurring revenue.
And it might be the stickiest model of them all.
WordPress won’t die. Although...
AI is about to nuke its two core markets:
- SMBs will get instant AI sites bundled with hosting for <$20
- Writers moved to @substack / @Ghost where distribution is built-in
That means the “generic CMS for everyone” model is collapsing.
The real deal isn’t in cloning #WordPress. It’s in building:
1) Vertical stacks → niche workflows with built-in monetization (think Beehiiv for growth, Circle for community).
2) AI-native infra → site builders with no plugins, no patching, no duct tape.
3) Distribution-first platforms → creators care about reach, not CMS features.
Lesson for devs: The web is shifting from one giant CMS to hundreds of purpose-built ones.
That’s where to build.
Who says you need venture capital to build a billion dollar company?
Hyperliquid did it without raising a cent.
11 people. $1.127 billion in annual revenue. $102.4 million per team member.
More revenue per employee than Apple, Meta, or Tether.
They built a high-performance perpetual futures exchange on their own Layer‑1. It processes 200,000 orders per second, charges zero gas fees, and runs a fully on-chain order book.
They now own 75–80% of the DeFi perpetuals market, move $30 billion in daily volume, and capture 37% of all blockchain protocol revenue.
In under two years, they’ve amassed over $1.5 billion in USDC assets, ranking among the top 15 exchanges by on-chain liquidity.
No hype. No ads. No funding.
Just technology and user alignment.
Bootstrappers, take note:
- Build infrastructure, not noise.
- Automate aggressively.
- Spend like it’s your own money.
- Users > investors.
Right product. Right timing. Right team.
That’s the playbook.
Most startup failures don’t come from bad ideas.
They come from bad co-founder relationships.
A platform quietly became the largest co-founder matching network in the world: 100,000+ matches so far.
Here’s the story 🧵
“The most powerful person in the world is the storyteller.” – Steve Jobs
“Homo sapiens rules the world because it is the only animal that can cooperate flexibly in large numbers… because it alone can believe in things like nations, gods, and human rights. These are stories” – Yuval Noah Harari
“The future belongs to those who can tell better stories.” – Nancy Duarte
“CEOs must be chief storytellers.” – Ben Horowitz
Storytelling isn’t fluff. It’s power.
Every great founder = chief storyteller.
Apple still thinks we want magic shows. Perfect lighting, $3,500 headsets, a big reveal once a year.
That worked when the iPhone was new. You could afford to wait 12 months for the future.
AI doesn’t work like that. It’s not theater, it’s a street fight. Models update weekly. Startups push daily.
Every release = more data, more feedback, tighter loop.
Fall behind in that loop and you don’t get back in.
@Apple isn’t losing AI because they’re dumb.
They’re losing because they’re moving at iPhone speed in an AI world.
Walk into a Rolex store with $15K and ask for a Daytona.
They’ll smile... but they won’t sell it.
Cash isn’t enough. First you buy the models nobody wants. Build “history.” Prove loyalty. Maybe then they’ll consider you for the waitlist.
And that waitlist? For most people it’s code for never.
So you hit the secondary market. That $15K Daytona? Now it’s $28K–$34K.
The real market lives on:
• Chrono24
• WatchBox
• Bob’s Watches
• Crown & Caliber
• Watchfinder
Problem: almost none take crypto. Try sending $40K by wire its slow, costly, compliance headache.
Solution? Platforms like https://t.co/RS15bMv1aZ are fixing that.
Big ideas don’t win.
Small ideas, executed relentlessly, do.
- Amazon started with books.
- Airbnb with air mattresses.
- Instagram with check-ins.
Nobody thought these were billion-dollar plays.
The lie is thinking you need the “next #AI/#crypto breakthrough” to win.
You don’t. You need a wedge, distribution, and the patience to grind.
Do you remember Netflix’s launch? Instagram’s? Google’s?
Neither do I.
@Airbnb launched 3 times before anyone noticed.
@instagram pivoted from a check-in app.
@Apple first iPhone was clunky.
The world’s best companies didn’t win on launch day. They won by iterating into product-market fit.
Your launch is a test, not a finish line. The real work starts after.
Self-custody isn’t for everyone.
We love saying not your keys, not your coins. It sounds empowering. But here’s what often gets ignored: most people aren’t ready for it.
I’ve seen friends lose everything. A seed phrase saved in the wrong place. A browser extension hijacked. A wallet misplaced during travel. No hackers, no big drama... just one small mistake. And in crypto, there’s no customer support, no undo button.
Self-custody gives you control, but it also makes you the single point of failure.
When you use a browser wallet, you’re trusting your device, your OS, your own habits. With a hardware wallet, you’re trusting the supply chain and betting you’ll never lose your recovery phrase.
The truth? Most people aren’t trained for this level of responsibility. Some never will be.
That’s why good custodians exist. Cold storage, insured wallets, recovery options, multiple signers: these are not signs of weakness. They’re ways to reduce risk.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about real-world security. About matching the setup to the person using it.
If you’re technical, go self-custody. If you’re managing millions or handling client funds, you need more than I wrote my seed phrase on a piece of paper.
Crypto isn’t just for engineers anymore. The future will be mixed custody models, smarter risk controls, and setups designed for different types of users.
Self-custody is a good option. It’s one path. Not the only one.
#crypto #metamask #wallet