Just want to take this time to thank the MJ fans who have been tirelessly fighting the phony allegations and narrative of lies for decades. Outsiders will never know how hard it is to be ridiculed, teased, bullied and questioned for rightfully standing up for MJ..
I’m letting you know now that I clearly see you and appreciate you.
We have fought side by side on the battlefield many times together. And we still have those battle scars to prove it. Just know, You will always have my deepest respect and appreciation.
It is easy to stand next to someone when everything is going great. But when things get rough and they truly need you, “Will you be there”?
My answer was always yes for my uncle Michael. And will always be.
Michael couldn’t stop his vitiligo.
Michael couldn’t stop his lupus from leading to reconstructive nose surgery.
Michael couldn’t stop aging.
What exactly was he supposed to stop?
"As soon as their price went up to $500,000, the hand went inside the pants.“ Still the best article ever written about the first extortion case is Mary Fischer‘s Was Michael Jackson framed? Here‘s a link to the pdf version https://t.co/6jKJPWBQlk
@2BadAboutIt7 Please take as much time as you need, my lovely friend. I feel you-with all that’s happening, it is very draining. Please know I’m always here too if you need to talk. Take care ❤️❤️🫂
@shamoaning_ Hopefully everyone will show them! That sick, distorted hit piece will never have a final say, the truth will come to light. People who know little, hopefully, will research and see the real truth that Michael was and continues to be a victim in all this.
calling all moonwalkers to make sure to rate/review #that hit piece on IMDB. the public deserves to know it's far from the serious, credible documentary it's being marketed as: https://t.co/Rb27uYkNH2
The fact that they raided Micheal Jackson’s home and found hundreds and thousands of tapes and archives this man kept… and they STILL found nothing!! Literally they found no evidence of criminal conduct or illegal materials on any of the confiscated media tapes! People Suck so Bad !
There are very few men who embody principle, integrity, and honesty the way Thomas Mesereau does. He has always stood by Michael Jackson and we truly appreciate you. #MJInnocent
Please read this; it is brilliant. The deception, manipulation, & one-sided media narratives need to end. More people should ask why certain stories are relentlessly pushed, & this is why critical thinking is important. MJ, an innocent man, is used as a smokescreen by the system.
There is only ONE true story about Michael Jackson’s 2005 trial and everything leading up to it. Let me lay it out for you from start to finish.
It begins in June 2000. Gavin Arvizo is in the hospital fighting cancer. Michael Jackson hears about him and calls him. Just a call to lift a sick child’s spirits. They meet in person for the first time in August 2000. By October, Michael gives the family a van. They visit Neverland, but MJ isn’t even there. After that? Almost no contact for two full years. Then, in September 2002, Martin Bashir asks for the Arvizos to be part of his documentary. That’s what brings them back in.
February 2003: Living with Michael Jackson airs, deceptively edited to paint a monster. Michael and his team are forced into defense mode against the fallout. From that moment on? All hell breaks loose. And eventually, you get the 2005 trial.
But here’s what the media won’t tell you: The Arvizos’ allegations are some of the weakest, most absurd claims to ever enter a courtroom as a criminal case. Before we even get to the absurdities, remember: The Arvizos had a HISTORY of false sex abuse allegations. The JC Penney extortion case. Allegations against David Arvizo. They also targeted celebrities like Chris Tucker, George Lopez, and Verne Watson for money and favors.
Their timeline makes absolutely no sense. The prosecution changed it multiple times after realizing their original story was indefensible. Most people still believe MJ molested Gavin BEFORE the Bashir interview. But Gavin himself alleged it started AFTER the documentary aired. Let that sink in. Why would Michael Jackson,knowing he was under investigation, with the entire world on high alert, decide to start abusing a child at that exact moment? That bullshit actually made it into a courtroom.
And the “false imprisonment” claim? Complete fiction. The Arvizos went to multiple places during their so-called imprisonment. Not once did they try to call for help. Even worse: After “escaping” twice, with the help of MJ’s own employees, they WILLINGLY went back to Neverland. Make it make sense. Please. The “abduction” story fell apart when Chris Tucker testified: The Arvizos asked HIM to take them to Florida. They went willingly. Michael didn’t organize any of it.
Tom Mesereau proved the mom and siblings were all in on it. His cross-examination of Star Arvizo was a masterpiece. Mesereau handed Star a straight adult magazine, dated AFTER the last alleged abuse. “Is this the magazine Mr. Jackson showed you?” Star said yes. Game over. The media was NOT reporting on the courtroom massacre, most outlets buried it. Mesereau picked apart EVERY single “witness.”
MJ’s 2003 indictment had almost nothing to do with the Arvizos or the prosecution’s garbage case. The ONLY reason the grand jury indicted Michael Jackson was a decade of sensationalism, folklore, and misinformation. They were already convinced he paid hush money in the 90s, so they assumed guilt, even though the legal settlement never prevented the Chandler’s from pursuing a criminal trial.
During cross-examination, Mesereau asked Janet Arvizo: “Did you start investigating Michael through lawyers as early as January 1, 2000, before you even met him?” Janet never gave a clear answer. She rambled. The judge ordered her to respond. Even then? No direct answer. Mesereau told the court he didn’t believe he’d received an answer, but moved on. The judge let it go. But the question lingers: Why couldn’t she answer? If she had nothing to hide, why not just say yes or no? What was the motive? Some say: she wanted money, gifts, favors, or false allegations. Others say: poor wording in a report. But here’s what’s undeniable: Janet Arvizo had credibility issues from day one. And one thing was always at the center of this family’s efforts: money.
@2BadAboutIt7 My God, there are such vile people around. They’re the ones who are suspicious, or even projecting. This slandering of an innocent soul has to end. 💔