Iran is not the Islamic Republic. Opposing the regime is not serving foreign powers. Iran’s future belongs to its people alone. #Iran#NationalSovereignty#FreeIran
According to Ramin Kamran, turning Iran federal during a crisis risks national collapse.
War requires a centralized command; dividing authority weakens defense, fuels tensions, and invites foreign interference.
Mixing religion with politics in Iran has replaced expertise with ideology. The result? Economic collapse, global isolation, and a brain drain. Governance requires modern science and accountability, not religious dogmatism. #Iran
Dr. Ramin Kamran is right: women’s rights are fundamental rights, not gifts from the state.
Iran’s reality is far from this. But politics is a matter of will, and change is possible.
Is Iran ready for these rights?
Iranian people are caught between a regime they don’t want, the threat of war, sanctions, rising prices, and a world that seems to look away.
How much more can people take?
#Iran#IranianPeople
Parliament or President? — Ramin Kamran
Translated and summarized by Azadeh Mohammadi
Iran’s political crisis has reached a point where the country needs a clear transition towards a new political system. Two possible paths are often being considered: a strong presidential system or a system centered on an elected parliament.
A presidential system has the advantage of concentrating political power and decision-making in one person. But this also creates a major risk. If that individual fails, changing the entire political direction becomes difficult.
A parliamentary system, by contrast, distributes political power among elected representatives and allows different views within society to be represented. It also gives people a more direct role in shaping political decisions.
Iran has no recent experience with a genuinely free and representative parliament, but historically the parliament has had an important place in the country’s political life. A freely elected parliament could therefore become an important foundation for a new political order.
The question is not simply whether Iran should have a president or a parliament. The important issue is whether the new system will truly reflect the will of the Iranian people and allow them to participate in determining their country’s future.
In times of crisis, accepting the people’s right to make decisions is not a luxury; it is a necessity
دیدگاه دکتررامین کامران،رهبرسازمان ایران لیبرال برای عبوراز
بن بست سیاسی فعلی.اقتباس توسط یکی ازهواداران خانم آزاده،باتشکر
#جنگ و #محاصره_اقتصادی،همین حالافشارسنگینی برمردم ایران واردکرده.امایک نگرانی دیگرهم وجوددارد: #براندازی در میانه جنگ👇
@RKamrane@hassan_behgar
طنزتلخ :ایران امروز
خبرهاهرروز،شایدهم لحظه ب لحظه عوض میشوند،اماثباتِ سفرهی مردم درکوچکتر شدن،تنهاواقعیتِ تغییرناپذیرست!
شایدوقت آن رسیده باشدک خودمردم درباره #آینده ایران تصمیم بگیرند
نویسنده یکی از هواداران سازمان ایران لیبرال،خانم #ازاده.
#ایران_امروز#ایران
#ملت_ایران
Iran needs neither another ideology nor another “savior.”
It needs a laïque state.
As Dr. Ramin Kamran argues, religion must leave political power to the people.
A different Iran begins here.
#Iran#Laicite#Democracy