Our mission is simple: Some suburban liberals in SFL are pushing a disastrous assault weapons ban in #Florida. They must be stopped.
#BAWN#gunsense#ExpectUs
BREAKING: The Virginia Attorney General's office just informed us that the Virginia State Police intends to enforce Universal Background Checks for private sales IN DIRECT DISREGARD OF THE COURT ORDER HALTING ENFORCEMENT!
@GunOwners and @VCDL_ORG's motion for contempt of court will be filed tomorrow!
If it weren’t for @RepEliCrane, Republicans would not have amended H.R. 1041 to retroactively restore the gun rights of 270,000+ veterans who have already been disarmed.
Thank you, Congressman, for defending veterans’ Second Amendment rights.
I helped start the drug legalization movement in the late 80s, carrying on the work of my friend Thomas Szasz and alongside my dear friend Roy Childs and Milton Friedman and other libertarians.
As we are wont to do, libertarians lost leadership over the movement we sparked to liberal Democrats (long, sad story) and they fucked it up as I predicted in Liberty.
The drug war rages on and, like the war on guns, has all sorts of negative side effects such as illegal immigration from drug-producing countries.
MAGA is too dimwitted to connect the dots.
If you don’t understand Mark Thornton’s Iron Law of Prohibition, I feel for you. 😂
Back wearing my policy wonk hat today.
🚨BREAKING🚨
The House just passed @RepBost's Veteran 2nd Amendment Protection Act 216-201.
H.R. 1041 codifies @SecVetAffairs' restoration of 270,000+ veterans gun rights & prevents future veteran disarmament!
Before 1968, Americans could buy guns (including AR-15s) with no ID, no background check, no age check. They could even buy guns by 𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙡 𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧. Mail off a check, they mail you back a gun.
Yet mass shootings were extremely rare, and gun violence wasn’t worse than today.
firearms are called "assault rifles" when in the hands of civilians
but they're called "patrol rifles"
when the police get them.
This is Orwellian Doublespeak.
States trying to ban 3D printers to stop people from exercising their rights. Think about that. They'd rather criminalize manufacturing technology than admit gun control was always about control — not guns.
The saying goes and has been proven true time and time again, if they want to ban your guns, they're planning to do something to you that would make them valid targets.
"WhAt AbOuT gUn SaFeTy?"
The tyrants are concerned with their own safety. Not yours.
Colorado finds itself in a bizarre legal and political puzzle: the state that legalized marijuana in 2012 now faces a clash over whether using that very substance should cost someone their ability to exercise a constitutional right, and it’s all playing out at the U.S. Supreme Court.
In a blatant display of hypocrisy, career gun banner Governor Jared Polis recently publicly stated that lawful marijuana use shouldn’t mean losing Second Amendment rights, saying there’s “no reason someone should be banned from exercising their right simply because they use marijuana.”
At the same time, Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser has signed onto a multistate filing defending the federal prohibition on firearm possession by cannabis users, including in states where marijuana is fully legal under state law.
At the core of the issue is 18 USC 922(g)(3), the federal prohibition on firearm possession by “unlawful users” of controlled substances, which the Supreme Court is reviewing in United States v. Hemani through the Bruen lens.
What do you think?
Should marijuana use trigger firearm prohibitions?
Every full auto Friday we remember America before 1986 when all Americans could purchase new production fully automatic weapons at any local gun store without any significant hassle or exorbitant pricing. We shouldn’t just oppose new gun “laws,” we should also push for the removal of draconian limitations on the freedom of all Americans to exercise their right to self defense in any manner they see fit 🇺🇸
📸:
Sten parts kit build with a home made 9mm suppressor out on the end 🇬🇧🤙🏽
#FullAutoFriday #STEN #2a #WWII #FAF #LPVO #Liberty #Friday #history #toob #StenchGun #TrenchGun #PlumbersNightmare #SAS #Mi6
This is what is scheduled for the 2/20 SCOTUS conference:
All five "Assault Weapons" ban and/or mag ban cases (Lamont/Duncan/Gator's/Viramontes/Grant) have all been scheduled.
Vincent v. Bondi, a non-violent felon case that has survived 6 conference dates is scheduled.
Fooks v. Maryland, as state prohibitor case, is up for its first conference.
NRA v. Vullo II, a First Amendment case (NAGR was an amicus party at the merits stage in Vullo I, where SCOTUS ruled in favor of the NRA) is up for its first conference.
The 18-20 cases have NOT been scheduled for the 2/20 conference, all four of them have only received one conference date each, and have been on ice since.
Lots of tea leaf reading to engage in, we shall report as information becomes available.
During a House Judiciary hearing, AG Pam Bondi declined to justify why NFA registration remains in place after the suppressor tax was reduced to zero—fueling criticism from gun-rights advocates.
https://t.co/zgKWeQYeuz
Gun Owners of America,
National Association for Gun Rights,
National Rifle Association,
and I spoke out this week
to contest FBI Director & U.S. Attorney statements disparaging your Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
My opponent is hiding on this…
He’s afraid to support 2A.
🦗🦗 🦗