BREAKING: The New York City Council just approved a ban on surveillance pricing.
The measure passed 44-5, and Zohran Mamdani is expected to sign the bill.
Companies will no longer be able to charge different prices based on algorithms or New Yorkers’ personal data.
Doesn’t seem to me that you need a complex conspiracy theory to understand the Jensen Huang story. I’d guess staffers at Treasury and intel agencies were angry that their info (and policies) were being ignored by Lutnick and Trump, and that the SE Asian sales were not being stopped so they leaked to the press after the midterm election. Who benefits? (as conspiracy theorists like to say?). Staff whose job is implementing the sanction policies.
The timing of this announcement turned out to be comically bad for Google. At the moment when populist rage at big tech has never been clearer, Google decides to openly threaten schools if they don’t use their AI.
Which new elected wants an out-of-the-box, winning-issue crusade?
Ramaswamy noted during the campaign that he had never met Acton. She refused to debate him, never bumped into him on trail. And she let his concession go to voicemail.
Hakeem Jeffries: “This is not a partisan moment. This is a patriotic moment. This is not a blue moment or a red moment. It’s a red, white and blue moment because American has won tonight."
If the election results have shown us anything so far, it's that embracing a big tech-led framework for "responsible data center development" would be a great way to immediately torch all of your freshly acquired goodwill and political capital
crazy wild scoop from @RachelFrazin amidst election night news: big tech (microsoft, google, amazon) and major environmental nonprofits (sierra club, lcv, nrdc) are apparently in talks for a framework on responsible data center development
https://t.co/lEe4FQ9KcU
👨💻 THREAD on how data center-related ballot measures are faring tonight
data centers are on the ballot in ~40 localities across 13 states, including proposed bans, votes on specific projects, and recalls of pro-data center politicians
The thing that Silicon Valley flacks can't seem to grasp is that people aren't stupid. They know that the issues of economic inequality, data center and AI buildouts, and, say, tech billionaires trying to buy elections, are linked.
Also, 23%—1 in 4 Americans—is really high.
It's funny - the folks trying to wishcast AI into higher salience look at this and say "23% is really high!" Sure, it increased fast.
But zoom out, and AI / data centers had the lowest salience ratings of the 5 issues the exit poll asked about:
by and large, there will be a mandate for those elected in this wave to rein in data center development, the AI industry more generally, the tech oligarchs more holistically. It's going to get interesting.
Many such cases, lots to sort through. But the trend lines looking pretty obvious right now, as evidenced by the mealy-mouthed statements or complete silence of AI execs
https://t.co/AdeQdmqX4b
People should always be in control of the future.
OpenAI is against the notion that it would be acceptable for people to be relegated to a role of doing things that “AI systems think makes sense to reward in humans”.
People should not cede control of the future to superintelligence, and that requirement should ultimately constrain AI progress.