KNOWN FABIAN MEMBERS THAT HAVE INFILTRATED GOVERNMENT IN THE UK & AUSTRALIA
UK
Keir Starmer — UK Prime Minister (former executive).
Clement Attlee, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Ramsay MacDonald — Former Prime Ministers.
Angela Rayner, Rachel Reeves, Wes Streeting, Anneliese Dodds, Sadiq Khan, plus many senior Labour MPs/cabinet members (hundreds historically affiliated).
Australia
(Australian Fabian Society, closely tied to Australian Labor Party)
Anthony Albanese — Current Prime Minister (active speaker/contributor).
Gough Whitlam, Bob Hawke, Paul Keating, Julia Gillard — Former Prime Ministers (many as active members/patrons).
Tanya Plibersek (Deputy Leader), Penny Wong (frequent speaker), Chris Bowen, Andrew Leigh, Wayne Swan, Bill Shorten, Jenny McAllister, John Faulkner.
State Premiers: Don Dunstan, Neville Wran, John Cain, Geoff Gallop.
Others: Jim Cairns, Frank Crean, Arthur Calwell, Kevin Rudd (speaker), plus numerous federal/state Labor figures.
Notes: Every UK Labour PM has been a Fabian. The Australian branch (formalised 1947, roots earlier) has similarly influenced the ALP through gradualist reform ideas. Lists are not exhaustive, as full membership details aren't always public.
🚨🇩🇪Germans have just launched mass calls to leave the EU!
After the European Parliament passed the mass internet surveillance law known as "Chat Control," Germans have started calling for DEXIT!
"We will not allow our rights and freedoms to be crushed."
It feels increasingly inevitable that Labour will eventually try to ban X.
They're already laying the groundwork by branding it a platform for “disinformation.”
The irony? Labour MPs have repeatedly been hit with Community Notes for spreading misinformation themselves.
Free speech seems to matter less when people can fact check those in power.
Onbeschrijfelijk nepparlement.
Stemming terwijl niemand weet waarover precies, maar uitkomst is dat ze doorgaan met chatcontrol 2.0.
Terwijl daarvoor bleek dat een meerderheid TEGEN is, maar dat ‘telde’ niet.
N-E-P-P-A-R-L-E-M-E-N-T
A Labour MP, Afzal Khan, has just reported me to the parliamentary authorities for my criticisms of Sharia courts, the burqa and halal slaughter.
In addition - he has reported our Rape Gang Inquiry for seeking to 'scapegoat' Muslims and 'sow division' in society.
He has also included in his report, published on his Facebook page, my appearance on Joe Rogan's show.
Appearing on Rogan's podcast itself he says is 'extremely problematic'.
I would like to be abundantly clear in my response.
I will not be apologising. I will not be silenced.
My views are shared by a large majority of the British people, and there is finally a political party willing to stand up for that patriotic majority.
Restore Britain.
Yes, you read that correctly: the majority present voted _against_ chat control.
But due to the absurdly undemocratic, illegal, procedure they're using, it comes into law anyway after being rejected multiple times before in previous votes.
Insane.
The EU Lawmakers are barking again they must be dumb as fuck because they know well enough they can't touch anything out of their boundaries. Have fun with mass surveillance on US Tech Companies hate to say it but we will have you cancelled this is not about child porn.
BREAKING
🇪🇺The EU Parliament voted against Chat Control.
314 to 276.
It passed anyway.
Democracy is when you need a supermajority to say no but a simple trick to say yes.
Even if this doesn't pass where you live, it is still a global problem. The world's governments are taking inspiration from each other with every mass surveillance law they pass.
Make your voices heard. Don't let this happen
The Fabian Society's coat of arms is literally a wolf wearing a sheep skin. (A wolf in sheeps clothing) as the saying goes. This is what Starmer was a member of. And im pretty sure so is Andy Burnham.
Hey @andyburnham
Putting you on notice
It will be your face on the projections & flyers across Britain if you choose to try to make Britain Digially ID’d
Please step
Away from this
Our whole existence is based upon defending and upholding our right to privacy autonomy & freedom Together
Det är officiellt: Fulspelet i Bryssel gick i lås.
En majoritet av ledamöterna i salen röstade precis för att stoppa Chat Control. Men eftersom EU-topparna tvingade fram sin "hastprocedur" krävdes det plötsligt en absolut majoritet på 361 röster från hela parlamentet för att avvisa förslaget. Tack vare att de la omröstningen mitt under semstern, när bänkarna står tomma, var det i praktiken helt omöjligt att nå den spärren.
EU-ledningen lyckades alltså med konststycket att runda en demokratisk majoritet.
Återgå till en ren handelsorganisation? Ja tack, det här överstatliga monstret har spårat ur totalt.
The EU Parliament voted 311 to 228 in March to kill Chat Control.
Parliament rejected it.
Dead.
Expired April 3.
The Council’s own lawyers said it violates the right to privacy under EU law.
Signal said they would leave Europe rather than scan messages.
WhatsApp said the same.
500 cryptographers signed an open letter calling it dangerous.
Everyone said no.
Yesterday the EU Council brought it back anyway.
Using a second reading procedure that requires Parliament to find 361 absolute votes to kill it again.
That threshold is almost impossible to hit.
The Parliament voted 311 against.
Now they need 361 against.
The Council used a procedure that has no clear precedent in EU history.
Roberta Metsola, the President of Parliament, is helping push it through.
Even though Parliament she leads already rejected it.
The vote is Thursday.
If it passes platforms must scan every message before encryption happens.
Hash-matching against known databases.
Machine learning for unknown material.
Real-time text analysis for grooming patterns.
All warrantless.
All without judicial oversight.
All catching innocent people at 13-20 percent false positive rates.
Millions of flags per day in the EU.
All of it.
The Parliament said no.
The Council heard no.
Scheduled a vote Thursday anyway.
The rules of democracy do not apply when the outcome is predetermined.
This is how the EU works, it ignores democratic principles and applies the logic that any result not aligned with the EC should be voted repeatedly until they get their way.
Democracy can be subverted by a system that wishes to force its agenda, the EU are a principal example of how it is done.
CHAT CONTROL IS COMING
Even though most Members of the European Parliament have voted to REJECT Chat Control, we have not been able to reach the absolute majority that was needed (361 Members).
This is a sad day for Europeans.