Philip Udoma

C.E.0 & FOUNDER OF BETA ENGINEERING | GLOBAL HISTORIAN & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJEnglish They're paid and funded by anti-Semitic lunatics like @cenkuygur and the others

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJEnglish It will never happen.

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@MonicaCrowley RIP

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@XHNews It favors isreal. Isreal needs Turkiye enemy in the Syrian government 😂

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJEnglish Ukraine has the right to defend itself

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@CNN Amazing

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJENews 😂

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@XHNews China shouldn't allow some lunatics to use its influence against US interests

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJENews Hamas should disarm before legitimising any group

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJEnglish A stubborn fly follows the casket into the grave.

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJEnglish You're correct

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@AJENews Natural disasters are a threat to humanity.

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@FoxNews @JonathanTurley Where's the money going to? Us treasury?

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@FoxNews @ClaudiaCowanFox Justice

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

We're watching closely. @KremlinRussia_E should be aware of the consequences if you help rebuild Iran's nuclear facilities. You're poking the bear. Iran is in a war with the United States; putting your scientists in arms risks escalation. @The United States should take control of the capping sea.

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@elonmusk Big technology on earth

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@elonmusk Memories

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@elonmusk @bot 😂

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Good review of Grok @Bot

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

@elonmusk @bot I'm initiating the Grok right now

[Philip Udoma @BETASTORY_01]

#Iran and #Oman have not reached a finalised, mutually confirmed deal granting either side exclusive or shared revenue rights over the #Strait of #Hormuz, as some #Iranian statements suggest.** An #IRGC spokesperson (Hossein Mohebbi), cited by Tasnim and reported by outlets including #Reuters and #Bloomberg on 26 #August 2026, claimed agreements on each country’s share of the strait’s waters and of its revenues. Iranian and #Omani foreign ministries had discussed an interim framework for a temporary shipping corridor and mine-clearing, but stopped short of announcing a final revenue-sharing arrangement; Oman has not publicly confirmed the revenue claims, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not fully endorsed the latest IRGC remarks.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint (normally ~20% of global oil and significant LNG volumes). Under international practice and #UNCLOS principles (which Oman accepts; Iran has not ratified UNCLOS), it is treated as an international strait with rights of transit passage. Portions fall within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. Claims of exclusive bilateral ownership or the right to impose transit fees conflict with long-standing free-passage norms and face strong opposition from the #United #States, other #Gulf states, and much of the shipping industry.

Consequences Oman could face if it supports a #revenue-sharing or fee arrangement with Iran
Oman has historically balanced relations with Iran, the United States (its oldest Gulf treaty partner), and other #GCC states while prioritising freedom of navigation. Supporting an Iranian-framed revenue or “services” fee system would carry clear risks:

#US pressure and potential sanctions or worse**: US officials have repeatedly warned Oman against facilitating Iranian tolls, permits, or control mechanisms. #Treasury has threatened aggressive sanctions. #President #Trump previously stated Oman would “behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up.” Supporting such a deal could trigger secondary sanctions, restricted access to US #financial #systems, or broader diplomatic rupture.

Strain with GCC partners and loss of mediator role**: Other Gulf states oppose Iranian assertions of control or fees. Oman’s traditional quiet-diplomacy niche would erode; it has already faced criticism for appearing too accommodating.

Economic and security exposure**: While Oman has Arabian Sea ports that reduce its dependence on Hormuz for its own exports, any escalation that draws US or Iranian #military action near Musandam would threaten its territory, energy infrastructure, and trade. #Insurance costs, shipping disruptions, and reduced foreign investment would follow.
- **Domestic and legal complications**: Oman has publicly emphasized toll-free safe passage consistent with international law in earlier joint statements. Backing fees could create internal inconsistencies and legal challenges under its own commitments.

Oman has walked a careful line—discussing management frameworks while stressing sovereignty over its waters and international standards—but full endorsement of Iranian revenue claims would likely isolate it from Western and many Gulf partners.

Iran’s economic pressure
Iran faces severe, multi-layered economic strain that makes any Hormuz revenue scheme attractive to Tehran as a potential cash and leverage tool:

- Oil exports have been heavily disrupted by US naval blockade of Iranian ports, sanctions on its shadow fleet and related entities, and the broader conflict. Loadings and exports collapsed sharply at various points; remaining sales often occur at steep discounts.
- The economy is contracting (IMF projections of significant shrinkage), inflation has been extremely high (near or above 80% in some periods), and the rial has hit repeated record lows against the dollar.Thanks to @realDonaldTrump
for stopping this move.
@IranObserver0 @IRIMFA_EN @uscourts @USATODAY @FoxNews @CNN