@abu_fulaan1@yarasoolallahh Is it the dream which is a problem or him being unknown?
Because it’s not the dream we take as a daleel it’s the action which sayyiduna umar did not rebuke the “unknown man” for. Also if you don’t take creed from unknown people who is the slave girl which najdis hide behind?
Shameless to call him a Deobandi IMO
The Shaykh endorsed the Meccan Grand Mufti’s fatwa against Nanotwi
He also attested to Mawlana Qasuris’s entire book against Deobandi headhonchos, Nanotwi, Gangohi, and Saharanpuri
If you want proof for any of the above, just ask 😀
Layman anons should fear Allah regarding the ulama, these people have spent their lives sincerely spreading the Din. And anon over here has the audacity to try make memes about them for some dopamine. Shaykh Mubeen حفظه الله has been *teaching* Sarf and Nahw for close to 10 years
Salaam,
For anyone who is confused about this topic and wants to understand it fairly, this explanation should help.
The two great Imams of Hadith - Imam Ibn Salah and Imam Ibn Hajar - whose works form the foundation of Mustalah and are relied upon by every student of knowledge, both support the same position held by the Ash’aris regarding Ahaad Hadith that are not Mutawaatir.
To make things clear, follow along with the three photos posted with this clarification:
Photo 1:Imam Ibn Salah mentions that Authentic Ahaadith which are narrated through single chains can differ in strength depending on the chain. This alone shows they do not give Yaqeen (certainty) on their own. If it did, then there would be no such thing as “stronger” or “weaker,” because Yaqeen means certainty that cannot have even the slightest doubt. Once doubt is possible, it’s no longer Yaqeen. Keep this in mind as you read further.
Photo 2:Imam Ibn Salah explains that the Ahaadith in Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim do give Yaqeen, but not due to their individual chains automatically. Rather, they give certainty due to an external factor: the Ijmaa (consensus) of the Ummah on the authenticity of the two books. Since the Ummah cannot agree on something false, this consensus gives these Hadith the ‘certain truth’ status.
This shows us two things:
a) Without the consensus of the Ummah, even the most authentic Hadith would not provide Yaqeen/certainty, and
b) Authentic Hadith found outside Bukhari and Muslim do not inherently yield Yaqeen.
(Photos 1 & 2 are from Ibn Salah’s Muqaddimah)
Photo 3:Imam Ibn Hajar explains that those who say authentic Hadith give Yaqeen, only say that with a condition - that the Hadith is accompanied by qaraa’in. Qaraa’in are external factors that raise the strength of a Hadith, and in this discussion; from being speculative to being decisive. One of these factors, he says, is when a Hadith is found in Bukhari and Muslim. The Ummah’s agreement (external factor) on their authenticity acts as a decisive proof that lifts its Ahaadith to certainty.
(Nuzhatul-Nadhar of Ibn Hajar)
•
The second important point here is about terminology. Just like a politician may use the word power and he means control, whereas an electrician may use the same word power, and mean an amount of electrical energy consumed or delivered — the same happens in the Islamic sciences.
The scholars of Kalaam use the word “ilm” to mean an undeniable certainty, like 1+1=2, something that no Muslim or non-Muslim could possibly reasonably deny. It has no room for doubt at all,
Whereas Hadith scholars use the word “ilm” differently. For them, “ilm” refers to a narration that is authentic enough that acting upon it in Islamically becomes obligatory. All scholars agree that this meaning is what the scholars of Kalaam call ghalib al-dhann.
So whenever you see a Hadith or Fiqh scholar using the word “ilm” to refer to a non-Mutawaatir Hadith that is not in Bukhari or Muslim, understand that this is the same meaning as “ghalib al-dhann” in the terminology of the Kalaam scholars.
And if you see Kalaam scholars using the word “ilm” when discussing Hadith, they are referring to Mutawaatir reports, and sometimes to the Hadith of Bukhari and Muslim due to the external factor of Ijmaa (as explained earlier).
This shows that, as Imam Ibn Hajar stated in the third photo I attached, the difference is only one of semantics and terminology usage.
Because of this, one must be careful not to mix the terminology of the different sciences and then accuse the scholars of mistakes.
Such errors come from not understanding the specialized language within each discipline, which is common among those who have no formal traditional training in the Islamic Sciences, and those who preach that which they have not studied under a qualified scholar.
May Allah guide us to the correct understanding, and protect us from misconstruing the works of the scholars of Islam.
Salaam
An event took place in the north of England with al-Ḥabīb Kāẓim as-Saqqāf. As the Shaykh was speaking, a Christian man stood up and angrily said:
“How dare you say ‘peace be upon Jesus’. You are a Muslim. You cannot say this!”
Shaykh Kāẓim stood up in humility, looking towards the floor, and said the following:
“I sincerely apologise for upsetting you. Please forgive me.”
After the event, a lady approached the organisers and said she wanted to embrace Islām. She said:
“What I have just witnessed with the speaker is true faith and holiness, and I want to be a part of a faith firmly ingrained in compassion, humility, and mercy.”
The lady embraced Islām later that day.
For the nth time, the image of Usman is literally taken from his own thumbnail and has NOT been edited
I won't disagree that this happens, but on this occasion, it did not happen
Salafi Cleric Albani said:
"If repeating Allah Allah is allowed then doing dhikr of Lanat Allah would also be allowed."
No way he is equating dhikr with a curse, So as per Albani if praying is allowed then insulting someone should be allowed aswell?
Whoever seeks spiritual confirmation should come and sit with me, sit with me full of love. If I don't take them to RasoolAllah (salla-llahu alayhi wasalam), they have cause to feel disheartened.
- Khwaja Sufi Muhammad Aslam (may Allah be pleased with him)
Nothing pisses me off as much as Bengali salafis 🤦♀️ lowkey makes me sad too bc our ancestors didn’t do all that just for your average Bengali to takfeer their whole lineage…
🧵A thread on the Mufawwiḍ creed of Ibn Rajab
Zaynu-d-Dīn, Abū-l-Faraj, ʿAbdu-r-Raḥmān ibn ʾAḥmad ibn Rajab al-Ḥanbalī — the ḥāfiẓ, faqīh, and spiritual master of the Ḥanbalī mad͟hab.