@Supervillian007@tonystyles80@SteveSaretsky I'm not defending that it's a good or honest thing. But your answer is only partially true - those who hold assets will experience lift off, but those who don't will receive the hard landing. They will blame it on some "crisis" to keep people from fleeing their fiat. $BTC wins.
@Supervillian007@tonystyles80@SteveSaretsky All else being equal, if the rates are half on 50T of debt that's significantly less than full on 40T. It's thievery but most of the population is ignorant of it. It's literally built into the system by this point.
@Supervillian007@tonystyles80@SteveSaretsky You don't understand. They don't actually mean inflate the debt away, they mean balloon the debt so that the current obligations look small in comparison, while the currency takes the hit through massive inflation and negative real rates.
@fredo22@TNorth@GrainofSaltSF@hillery_dan It's up to personal opinion I guess. I personally had a hard time listening to Dan or Adrian, they seemed to be contrary to the vision. Grain was great but also went on a lot of rabbit trails. I think it's an excellent step to make it more intentionally institutional grade.
@BTCsessions@jackmallers@theBTCmentor I think the two of you missed something in the discussion about merchants and credit cards vs BTC. Couldn't merchants just offer a 3 percent discount to customers paying in BTC? I'm not sure how laws vary from country to country but this seems the most logical to me.
@AngryBuhda I absolutely love following him, and watching his videos on YouTube as well. Love to see when others call out others' excellence in this space. @SullyMichaelvan
@IIICapital I agree that buybacks are not the right tool for the job. The keys are the fundamentals. Yeild is one, but so are dividend frequency, stated objectives, liquidity, and more.