When George Floyd died The Sun cleared its front page.
When Henry Nowak’s killer was sentenced to a minimum of 21 years and his dad made his moving speech, the Sun gave it 256 words back on Page 16.
The signal from hopeless Sun Editor Victoria Newton is that White Lives Don’t Matter.
Remember that.
Sadly it is true.
Conservative Ministers told me to stop talking about Grooming Gangs out of fear of upsetting the Muslim community.
They criticised me in public because I described the perpetrators as largely Pakistani-Muslim.
They complained to the Whips about this being a ‘divisive’ issue.
It’s one of the reasons I left the Tory Party.
Britain had a moment of silence for George Floyd. Our politicians kneeled en masse to show their outrage at his killing. "I can't breathe" became a slogan.
George Floyd died on the other side of the world. He wasn't British.
Henry Nowak *was* British and his treatment by the police was shocking and negligent in the extreme. Yet there is no minute of silence. There is no coordinated public campaign. There is no kneeling at sporting events.
And we all know why.
During the summer of BLM, some people said "All Lives Matter". This was treated as the highest form of racism and anyone who said this was immediately cancelled. Why? Because the people in charge don't actually think all lives matter in the same way.
They have created a racial hierarchy of victimhood where a career criminal who died through mistreatment by police in a foreign country with 0 evidence of racism like George Floyd is automatically sanctified because of the colour of his skin.
And Henry Nowak, a British man, one of ours, is automatically dismissed and ignored because of the colour of his.
This is the ugly fruit of so-called "anti-racism", an obsession with race that has created a two-tier society which treats people differently because of the colour of their skin.
This needs to stop.
Barry Gardiner really didn’t like it on GB News tonight when I reminded him that 6 yrs ago he ran around breaking Covid laws to show solidarity with George Floyd yet today Labour MPs are unusually silent about Henry Nowak. Millions of British people see the hypocrisy.
@JohnCleese Suicidal empathy opens the door. Then the infiltration begins. Extreme ideology and abuses of position. Truth is that corruption is rampant; and money, power, greed and sex are often at the heart of it.
🔴 I feel sick, so sick to my stomach hearing this but it needs to be shared everywhere. It must be.
@RupertLowe10 reads out in Parliament testimonies of survivors by the Muslim Rape Gangs and Police involvement, as a result of his independent inquiry.
“He took the bottle of Jack Daniels and he forced it up inside me. He broke the glass. I was about 12 or 13”
“Comments were constantly made that White Girls had lower values than Muslim girls”
“Things would escalate around Eid. Worse. More violent. The parties would be bigger. More people involved”
“One of the girls got pregnant by one of them. His Dad was an Imam”
“I was raped by probably 600 or 700 different men”
“They put a cigarette out on the baby’s face”
“I was raped by multiple police officers in different parts of the country”
“As a Christian, wearing my cross would be special to me. But it was just used as a way to break me down. They would shout ‘Where is your God now? Has your God forsaken you?’”
“It was all White Girls. In a van. I remember seeing 15-20 girls locked in dog cages”
“Race DID play a part. Throughout my exploitation. The other girls I encountered or were abused along side me, were almost all exclusively White”
**
Honestly it gets worse and worse, thank goodness someone is DOING something about this.
Something is being done, instead of people being too afraid to be called “RACIST” or “ISLAMOPHOBIC” - we have seen evidence that this is the exact reason it went on for so long and is STILL going on today.
It cannot be used to cover up these systematic, race-based crimes anymore. The longer that it goes on, the more children are likely to be raped over time as a result.
If you cannot name a problem, you cannot solve a problem.
Remember the European Hospital in Khan Younis last May?
Israel struck a targeted site there, and the world lost its mind.
Palestinians denied any tunnel existed underneath. The UN and European governments rushed to condemn Israel for attacking a “hospital.” Outrage, headlines, accusations of war crimes… the usual script.
Then June came.
The IDF took international media into the very same location and showed them the tunnel… a full Hamas command center, right under the emergency room.
Weapons, rooms, infrastructure. And yes, that’s where they found and confirmed the body of Mohammed Sinwar, Hamas’s top military commander and brother of Yahya Sinwar.
The strike that killed one of the architects of October 7 was surgically precise, and entirely justified.
Under the Geneva Conventions of 1949, hospitals and other medical facilities lose their protected status when they are used for military purposes, such as command centers, weapon storage, or troop movements. By deliberately turning the European Hospital into a Hamas base, the terrorists themselves stripped it of any legal protection.
Not a single apology from the UN or the European governments that rushed to condemn Israel. Not one admission they were wrong. They simply moved on to the next round of accusations.
This is the pattern. Hamas hides its terror infrastructure under civilian sites, uses hospitals as shields, and the international community reliably attacks the defender for responding, only to be proven wrong again and again and again when the evidence emerges.
How many times does this have to happen before the world stops falling for it?
She was 14 and there was two of them going at her for five days, five days
They even tried get a lower taxi fare by offering her up to the taxi driver, why the fuck didn’t the taxi driver ring the police?
“On one occasion the men tried to force the girl to perform a sex act on a taxi driver in a bid to get a lower fare. “
White girls are just meat to Mirpuri Pakistani Cousins!
Deport or Execute, Prison won’t have changed their opinions on their host country or white people ?
Ed Davey has written to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson demanding she WITHDRAW official EHRC guidance protecting female-only spaces in toilets and changing rooms.
Let that land.
The Equalities and Human Rights Commission — a statutory body — has produced legally grounded guidance telling employers and public bodies that biological men should not access women’s single-sex spaces.
This is not opinion.
This is not politics.
This is the settled legal position following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on the meaning of “woman” under the Equality Act.
And Ed Davey wants it gone.
His stated reason?
The guidance is not “compatible with long-standing British values.”
British values.
He used those words to argue AGAINST protecting women’s single-sex spaces.
The same Liberal Democrats who lecture the country about tolerance, inclusion and human rights are now lobbying a Labour minister to tear up statutory guidance that protects every woman in Britain who walks into a changing room, a refuge or a hospital ward.
This is not a fringe position within the Lib Dems.
Their leader wrote the letter.
The party has chosen its side.
It is not the side of women.
Repost if you think women’s single-sex spaces should be protected.
Hi Makerfield,
I’ve u-turned 7 times in 3 weeks, was part of the New Labour you all now hate. Failed Pakistani rape gang victims, allowed Makerfield to be a dumping ground for illegal migrants. Dismissed your concerns as far-right propaganda.
Honest, I’ll be different as an MP!
Huh? Bob Vylan is fine, but Nigel Farage is apparently too dangerous for Desert Island Discs because BBC staff feel “unsafe”?
Millions vote for Farage & those millions pay the licence fee.
This isn’t bias anymore. It’s election interference funded by the public 🔥
Because too many local people are objecting to giant solar farms on farmland near their homes….
… Labour has changed the law so communities can object, but now those objections can be ignored.
Another little bit of our democracy chipped away.
Let’s nail this state lie once and for all. The government is NOT increasing defence spending by £270 billion during this parliament. It is a ludicrous claim.
Yet one Keir Starmer made to Parliament’s Liaison Committee in March: Labour, he said, will “spend £270 billion MORE (my emphasis) than we would otherwise have done on defence” in this Parliament.
Starmer has always been weak on facts and figures but even by his standards this is a massive porkie.
This is the truth: £270 billion is the total cumulative projected defence spending for the four financial years from 2025/26 up to and including 2028/29 lumped together.
It is NOT even the cumulative increase in defence spending during these years.
Nobody (except perhaps Gordon Brown) speaks about public spending in this way, unless the intention is massively to mislead.
By 28/29 defence spending is projected to be £13 billion a year more than at the start of the period. So not exactly £270 billion. But I guess if you’re going to lie you might as well make it a whopper.
Andy Burnham’s Greater Manchester authority is spending £722k of public money helping migrants claim benefits and access housing. Is this one of the Manchester policies he would like to roll out across the entire country? https://t.co/FGv4tnoncj
The United Nations has scrapped its worst‑case climate scenario.
Now is the time for a reckoning.
Entire countries shut down oil and gas and made themselves poorer based on the climate hoax.
Climate alarmists must be discredited, defunded, and issue formal apologies.
Police sacked hate crime adviser who warned the force favoured Muslims over Jews.
After complaining that officers had been ignoring the “elephant in the room” of Islamist extremism during a meeting about an anti-Semitic terrorist attack, the chairman of the policing scrutiny panel was sacked.
She was informed that she would be removed as chairman of the Bradford Hate Crime Scrutiny Panel because of her “divisive and inflammatory” comments.
She has accused West Yorkshire Police of appearing to prioritise Muslims rather than focusing on the Jewish community following last October’s attack on a synagogue in Manchester.
This follows another incident in which she was accused of “hate speech” by police officers after defending the right to criticise the Prophet Mohammed.
The former panel chairman, a retired academic in her 60s, is now seeking a formal apology from West Yorkshire Police Chief Constable Sir John Robins.
The Free Speech Union is proud to be supporting her. FSU General Secretary Lord Young said the force has shown that it is “more concerned with protecting the feelings of Muslim community leaders than protecting Jews from terrorist attacks”.
The academic was approached in 2022 to volunteer on the scrutiny panel tasked with monitoring how police respond to hate crime reports. Soon after she was elected chairman, Muslim police officers began calling for her removal.
She has suggested that the letter notifying her of her removal was “for the Muslim men who complained to him to get him to shut me up - and he did as they asked”. She also said it “sounded like a threat”, as the complainants had been demanding her personal details and asking whether she had herself committed a hate crime.
Blasphemy laws were abolished in 2008. A free society must allow criticism, challenge and debate of any religion.
The police must not kowtow to those who wish to enforce an Islamic blasphemy law that prevents others from doing their job.
Read more below 👇