@alz_zyd_ Physicists are obviously wrong. Successful physics is just trying to come up empirically adequate models. After Kant, nobody can say that this exact thing is "reality" or an approximation to "reality"
@0JoannaKo0@shallit43 The giants of science and mathematics fight and race over contributions and then these communities glamourize them to be humble and moral legends. 2/2
@ThomasVanRiet2 Then work on something else. If we have enough literature in quantum gravity to test when energy scales are accessible, till then people can exert energies to more immediate problems.
@0JoannaKo0 And who is in the community or not in the community? Should mathematical community follow "democracy" that what large percentage of mathematicians say is the correct route? Can this mathematical body have an authority to other independent organization to do maths?
@MaleManlpulator It appears Tao doesn't understand essence of technology. He wants best of both worlds. A medieval man could navigate by using the stars, modern man uses google maps. You always lose some ability to gain something from technology.
I'm very confused about the AI in math controversy. If these problems are worth solving, why not solve them? I guess a counterargument is that human mathematicians, in solving them, develop reusable tooling to tackle other problems, and AIs don't do that now, which is a fair point.
However, if that's the case, why don't we use AIs to get that as well, to distill the reusable mathematical infrastructure out of the particular proofs.
Shouldn't the push then be to do that with AI, rather than block AI from tackling the problems in the first place, e.g. like the senior math people blocking the Caltech hackathon and issuing vague threats to the participants?
If, on the other hand, senior mathematicians view math as primarily an aesthetic endeavor where human provenance is key, then this is certainly not the way the public thinks about them and their field, and why they are funded by the public at all.
@DeivonDrago And this demand for meaning is for something external, greater than us, larger than life etc. A nihilist takes the route from here that meaning itself can never be created.
@DeivonDrago And we as humans have intrinsic need for meaning otherwise we can't go on; this paradox leads to angst. In analytical tradition, these arguments are not taken seriously, but whoever been there knows it.