Yeah they said that in the 60's too... then in the 80's it was a large scale freezing, now, it's back to warming... seems pretty conclusive...
The science isn't conclusive. Maybe we should draw conclusion based on millions of years of time, ordinary climate change timelines evidenced by the archeological methods we used to even figure out climates changed, instead of a 2 year snap shot of temperature readings, back up by 400 years since the very first thermometer, in italy, before the discovery of... half the planet, compared to thermal imaging from space, over the past 20 odd years.
Just an idea, but, I love this super intelligent "tax US now daddy" mentality of solving warm weather.
Uhh what? Droughts are not normal yes, that's why they are called droughts. No desalinization plant has ever solved a drought. Evaporation purifies water. It's a natural process, that can be sped up by increasing the surface area of water as outlined by any understanding of the notion of vapor pressure, but sublimation probably isn't your strong suit, and it would make your assertions completely baseless, in addition to you having no grasp of how much water usage is "normal" for a restaurant with a square footage under 10k. There are lots of reasons I should be exasperated at your banality. Let's just say I'm not because I refuse to let stoopidity win.
Oh, yeah, what? I'm advocating for datacenters, because, I personally do not want to die. It's the only way to modify DNA to perpetuity, as in, you don't age. Nobody is going to die as a result of that, *does some math*, yeah for real. I can't see, understand, or imagine how you have come to that conclusion. However there are lots of things people think and do that don't make sense to me. I have my own theories as to why, but mostly it's because humans don't care, and are bad at being "better than animals".
That being said, this is way easier than figuring out who gave Gaza guns. Data centers do not use "massive" amounts of water. And, the water doesn't disappear. I think all of these ecofriendly yaya's that "know" what they need to do to save the planet, have no idea the ordinary amount of water they use in a day. Needless to say, it's more than they drink. I mean it's pretty typical to eat 3 chickens a day, per person (at least in some part) and that's alot of water right there, nobody cares. So why care about data centers?
Tp me it's up there with calling Tesla dealerships Nazi headquarters, so you light them on fire, or cheering on people who film kids burning alive to get donations. Solving water shortages can be, and for the most part, is really easy, half of LA burns down, not because of a water shortage, but because somebody turns off the hydrants, and you guys are still somehow fine with the mayor, the governor, free diapers, and a new war on data centers, as long as gasoline is cheaper than a Monster energy drink, and not because Monsters are mostly water.
Yeesh I can go on... but I have to do some administrative work so... Seriously, do some math, or yourself a favor. Here i'm obviously way faster than you.
From Gemeni:
"
A typical 24-hour fast-food restaurant like McDonald's or Burger King uses roughly 350,000 to 550,000 gallons of water per year.
While large, sit-down casual dining restaurants can easily guzzle over 2 million gallons annually, "Quick-Service Restaurants" (QSRs) are surprisingly efficient because they use disposable packaging, automated cooking processes, and don't wash mountains of customer plates and silverware.
However, since you mentioned a 24-hour operation, their usage bumps up toward the higher end of the QSR average. Here is how that water gets broken down day-to-day
"
So 13 million a year for a campus hundreds fo thousands of square feet, is... just fine, low, not extra ordinary.
@beyond_capital Yeah law and order, the foundation of society, is bad. We shouldn't even have taxes, or like technology, we should go back to might makes right, let the strong survive.
@mcsquared34 Sure, and tests are racist. So we should just treat everybody like they are educated, and pay them. Then there would be no need for set Ops, drug gangs, trap houses, prostitution, we could just get to work.
Yeah sure bud, ya know if money solved problems, we wouldn't have any. I am still amazed how people can just be like, here is $.05, now I can get to work... In your world, that "just makes sense". You can see, drive by, a "free diner", just gives food away, and complain that hunger is still an issue, or that's why all the homeless people live near there. Like poof, solved those problems.
@jayb0g1@EllieGabalus I'm not googeling it for you, there were multiple across Europe. Smaller ones I'm sure, and they used this very article, body of research, to justify it. Bill Gates was involved, ya know the guy banned from administering vaccines in India because of how many people it killed.
First off fuck Palestine, secondly, we do have plenty of drinking water, and it's easy to purify. I don't understand why people can't grasp the basics of physics. Like where does Gaza keep getting guns from, and why do they keep sending kids to fight wars? It's not cool. Yeah fuck those guys.
Anywho it can be hard to generate lots of clean drinking water, especially if you need to keep up with a massive population explosion, like why Gaza needs water from Israel, they just "don't know how to live" with out help from the international community that... doesn't give them guns? *shrug nobody knows where they get all these bullets from!?*
See without the electricity from Israel, and water and food and healthcare and cement, they wouldn't be able to know precisely where a bomb was going to drop after telling a child there was "free food" over there, or could put them out after dousing them in gasoline and lighting them on fire, well they get paid more if they film. Yeah sorry one more time fuck those guys, ya know what, you can't even register as human at this point. Good luck with whatever... have fun invading people who care about their children.
I think you are just making stuff up. My third post in profile outlines clearly a method to pump 27k l/s 30' in the air, thats more than enough water to evaporate and condense, naturally, using zero electricity or power, it's called a gravity well. The post literally says Eureka on it. I also groked it, it's a bit long, because... well science stuff, but, it's concrete and true. That being said, yes I aware, and found a solution. You said water was a problem, then said it wasn't a problem except we can't drink it, now I can desalinate it without reverse osmosis, for nearly free, using ordinary physics, and... I bet you re gonna have a panic attack trying to tell me again why, these things, need a constant supply of water, instead of using a closed loop system like every liquid cooled PC on the planet. (that's not a constant supply) See I can't figure that out either, I also know how much water a fast food restaurant uses, and how much water I use on accident, and thus don't think 2 square miles of compute using a million gallons a year, is very much. Do you like math, drink water, do any civil engineering, some physics, ya know living people stuff, of do you like plug the internet into your skull and just kind of vomit random buzz word trash. Seems like the last one.
WoW, imagine going to work, with the intent of making your team, company, country and society the best it can be. You must be the most selfish, shitty, angry, weakling that has ever crawled out of the ocean. I mean even mammals went back into the water to kick it's ass. It's one thing to be a pathetic, but to fault people for being virtuous? Like whoa, what do you mean you're not a corrupt piece of shit, your making us corrupt pieces of shit look bad... It's just like, condemnable.
So unless you're a devout christian in all of your dealings with everybody anywhere all the time to the point of persecution of others who are also christian, and it's OK to not hold Islam to the same standard, you are just doing Allah's will. I mean right? If people were "good" Muslims, 90% of terrorist activity would be instantly stopped? 95%?
Well it was, is. Made it into the hands of political parties who touts it in addition to other carbon cutting measures to reduce the need for beef, thus beef farts, and force people into eating printed meat, which would be way more expensive, and they might have had shares in the companies that produced such meats. It was very, very unbiased, ethical science, to force the population to "get physically ill" when they ate meat. Sorry, it was THAT widespread, I didn't even do any research, I was looking into the technology because it might be useful in space.