The OP's picture isn't a Minoan painting.
Lol, the Minoans depicted themselves much like many modern Sicilians and Greeks still look today. We also have autosomal DNA from Minoans, which shows strong genetic continuity with modern Europeans. Skin color variations exist not "black".
You're just a west-african N1g bantu(talk about barbarian) This doesn't even concern you, like, at all.
@J_lMl_J@grok@StubbornOctopi This has been common knowledge since 2014. You derive your talking points from wwwrealhistory which was born out of the ghettos of section 8 housing 16 years ago. So many breakthroughs since then. Time to update your material
@grok
For clarification on hunter gatherers,
40kya crog-magnon European hunter gatherers were not "black" as Sub-Saharan Africans in phenotypic variation, or even as dark as Sub-Saharan Africans, because Sub-Saharan Africans are actually darker than the ancestral baseline due to the MFSD12 mutation, which occurred near the equator. There is no reason to assume Eurasians ever looked like sub-saharans in phenotypic traits or in skin color.
@grok
Actually, Early European Farmers were lighter-skinned. Anatolian farmers from their huge settlements are the ones who brought forth the lighter skin alleles. The same people who built ΓatalhΓΆyΓΌk 9kya (my ancestors). Even the English carry up to 50% of their DNA from them.
Original lighter skin genes expanded with agriculture, not because of the false notion of hunter-gatherers living in caves.
@hmrnews@A_BLACK_VOICE@thescottbarber Also, the same Anatolan Neolithic roots were even the English can have upwards to 50% Anatolian.
And derived from the same sub neothlic culture
This is cope for brownoids. Greeks don't look like this. And the problem isn't the darker complexion, its the other weird indian/gypsy/Mestizo phenotypic traits. This is definitely not representative of the phenotypic traits of ancient Neolithic Anatolians either, as we can see from Sardinians, who have the highest proportion of Anatolian Neolithic (Early European Farmer) ancestry, at over 80%.
Greeks don't look like the OP picture. And the problem isn't the darker complexion, its the other weird indian/gypsy/Mestizo phenotypic traits. This is definitely not representative of the phenotypic traits of ancient Neolithic Anatolians either, as we can see from Sardinians, who have the highest proportion of Anatolian Neolithic (Early European Farmer) ancestry, at over 80%.
We have living representatives of high early European farmers today. 80%-90% which is higher than minoans around 70%-75%
Greeks don't look like this. And the problem isn't the darker complexion, its the other weird indian/gypsy/Mestizo phenotypic traits. This is definitely not representative of the phenotypic traits of ancient Neolithic Anatolians either, as we can see from Sardinians, who have the highest proportion of Anatolian Neolithic (Early European Farmer) ancestry, at over 80%.
As he said, too brown. The skin tone isn't even the problem. It's the other brown phenotypic traits.
And what you would know about the foundations of European culture?
And those traits are definitely not representative of ancient neothlic anatolian traits. All you have to do is look at Sardinians with over 80% EEF/ANATOLIAN.