Denys Beecher

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@theDarkoside @TractorLaw @GregAbbott_TX @SenBryanHughes Looks like you committed one of the three classic blunders. Never start a land war in Asia, never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line, and never quote from Schenck v. US without reading it first.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@GamerHijabi @Pray4TheBatman @SmashJT 8) his own website's server logs, and 9) records of sales of products from his own website? Because those are the things the judge ordered him to produce

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@GamerHijabi @Pray4TheBatman @SmashJT So your argument is that he didn't have access to 1) his own LLM prompts, 2) his GiveSendGo transaction records, 3) his YouTube income records, 4) his own website's income records, 5) his other income records, 6) records of his ownership of his website, 7) his own website's code,

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@bird0talk @AlvaroIM77 @SmashJT @JayViperTV Quite a big jump from getting Rule 37 sanctions to "therefore there's going to be a SLAPPback."
And what do you think collateral estoppel has to do with a lack of personal jursidction? There haven't been any final decisions of any kind. How could something be estopped?

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@bird0talk @AlvaroIM77 @SmashJT @JayViperTV Do you think that a case filed in federal court in New York, with claims predicated on New York's Civil Rights Laws, is going to be dismissed under a special procedural motion created by... California law?

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@kmw63 @SmashJT It's good news for him and his family that he has to pay five-figures in sanctions to her to compensate her for her attorneys' fees?

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@endthusiam @SmashJT Jurisdictional discovery could have been over a long time ago if he'd actually turned over the stuff he was supposed to. The hearing today was on the amount he'd have to pay her for the sanctions order that was issued a month ago.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@AllisonIsi36706 @SmashJT That would probably be easier if the hearing today hadn't been about deciding how much money he already owes her for attorneys' fees.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@animecore85 @SmashJT He was sanctioned by the judge a month ago for failing to produce required jurisdictional discovery information. Today's hearing was just on how much he'd have to pay her for the sanctions. Presumably five-figures, even assuming they took a 50% haircut on fees.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@ur_fave_dahlin @SmashJT The step closer here being him agreeing to pay her attorneys' fees after being sanctioned by the judge for failing to cooperate with discovery...

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@ShaolinLambKill @billdonahue84 @SmashJT I'm not the one who had to issue sanctions for his failure to participate in discovery, the judge was. https://t.co/0IMJYEyx3M

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@DanParente @SmashJT Because he repeatedly failed to cooperate with discovery and now has to pay her lawyers' fees for compelling him to actually do what the court ordered him to.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@animecore85 @SmashJT Well, jurisdictional discovery could have been over with already if he'd actually bothered to cooperate. Instead he's now had to agree to pay her for her attorneys' time in forcing him to actually produce the information.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@ShaolinLambKill @billdonahue84 @SmashJT That is the kind of interpretation he's trying to lead you to with the vague language, but if you'd actually been following the paperwork you'd know that he's having to fork over probably five-figures in fees to her for having caused all sorts of delays in discovery.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@Pray4TheBatman @SmashJT It's been repeatedly extended because of his failure to actually provide the information in discovery. The fees he's agreeing to are to compensate her for the extra effort she's had to go to in order to get the information out of him

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@Elesoterik @KainReave @SmashJT I'm sure that would be a relevant argument if "intent" was the element I was talking about. What you're looking at here is reckless disregard for falsity as actual malice.

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@SmashJT https://t.co/Q4JawLO87f

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@SmashJT https://t.co/6Bf2wywkEM
Is this really the settlement offer you're refusing?

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@Nasmr9 @SmashJT @alyssa_merc @RonColeman Nope. https://t.co/haC3jSSgGb

[Denys Beecher @BeecherDenys]

@RonColeman @SmashJT @mcdizzle17 @TheCartelDel Dunno, looks pretty darn accurate to me.
https://t.co/mi73BGQSl0