While raising hundreds of millions of dollars from neurotic left-wingers via direct mail by stoking fear of surging "hate groups," the SPLC literally paid someone more than $270,000 to, among other things, plan and organize the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, VA. The SPLC also paid six-figure amounts to people at the same time they were listed as extremists the group was dedicated to battling against.
If accurate, the SPLC was literally funding and coordinating the "hate" surge it used to solicit funds for its operations. The whole organization was a con job.
Absolutely wild suff from the Trump DOJ.
Grok still has a lot of work to do.
If you ask Grok if this clip is real, it will tell you it’s real, but then cites a Snopes article saying that it’s “misleading”, and then says that Obama didn’t actually say what he said.
Grok is just straight up wrong, and until it stops using bullshit “fact-checkers” like Snopes as a reliable source, it’s going to continue to spit out lies.
The Left went great lengths to keep this video hidden from circulation, and they are still trying. Why? Because it proves their entire treasonous plot.
No matter what any AI chatbot or MSM outlet says, Obama clearly encouraged illegals to vote, by telling them that they are citizens if they vote, and that immigration will not seek them out if they vote, and that nobody can turn them away if they show up to vote.
The Party is trying to tell you to ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears. There’s absolutely zero reason for Obama to say these things, unless he was encouraging illegals to vote. Period. Full stop. End of story. Treason.
They Killed Cursive So You’d Need a Translator to Read Your Own History
Two generations now. That’s what we’ve manufactured.
You Can Thank Progressive Ideologue Randi Weingarten and the American Federation of Teachers
In 2010, cursive was quietly stripped from Common Core. No debate. No vote. Just gone — replaced by keyboarding and test prep. Fast forward to today, and the results are exactly what any thinking person would have predicted.
Drew Gilpin Faust — former Harvard president, not exactly a conspiracy theorist — walked into her Civil War seminar and discovered two-thirds of her Harvard undergraduates couldn’t read cursive. Two-thirds. At Harvard. One student admitted he’d reshaped his entire senior thesis to avoid sources with handwriting. Another abandoned Virginia Woolf because she couldn’t read Woolf’s letters.
Let that sink in. The elite are being graduated illiterate in their own language’s written form.
What’s actually been accomplished here?
- The Declaration of Independence is now a foreign document to most Americans under 30. They can’t read it. They depend on someone else’s transcription — someone else’s framing.
- Grandma’s letters from the war. Mom has to translate the birthday card. The direct, unmediated connection to your own bloodline? Severed.
- Original manuscripts, land deeds, family Bibles, journals, contracts. All of it now requires a credentialed interpreter — a new priesthood of specialists who tell you what your history says.
Faust herself spelled out the implication with brutal clarity: “Just imagine if you had some contract that you had signed and you couldn’t read it and someone told you, well, this is what’s in the contract. And then later you might find that it was something else.”
That’s not a bug. That’s the feature.
When a population can’t independently access primary sources, history becomes whatever the gatekeepers decide it is. The past isn’t discovered — it’s assigned. And a person who needs permission to read their own inheritance is a person who’s been quietly, thoroughly disempowered.
The technocrats will tell you it was just pragmatic modernization. Nothing to see here. Just optimizing the curriculum for the 21st-century economy.
Funny how the “optimizations” always seem to produce citizens more dependent, more disconnected, and easier to manage.
Teach your kids cursive. Buy the workbook. Spend twenty minutes a day. Not because it’s charming or vintage — but because a people who can’t read their own founding documents in the original hand are no longer a free people. They’re tenants in their own civilization, renting access to a past that was stolen from them one curriculum meeting at a time.
🎥 The 2016 Obama “Illegals Can Vote” Moment — What Actually Happened
Many have raised one of the most damning pieces of video evidence in the election integrity debate. Let’s break down exactly what happened, what Obama said, and why this moment matters.
📋 The Interview: November 4, 2016
Four days before the election, Obama sat down with actress Gina Rodriguez for the Latino-focused digital outlet mitú. The interview was ostensibly about dispelling “voting myths.”
The critical exchange, verbatim:
Rodriguez: “Many of the millennials, DREAMers, undocumented citizens — and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country — are fearful of voting. So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?”
Obama: “Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over, and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.”
🔍 Why This Is So Incriminating
The apologists — Reuters, Snopes, the usual fact-check cartel — all rush to say “he was talking to citizens, not illegals!” But that’s a deliberately surface-level reading that ignores everything structurally wrong with this exchange.
Here’s what the defenders conveniently skip over:
1. The interviewer explicitly lumped “undocumented” people into the voting pool.
Rodriguez said “undocumented citizens” and “DREAMers” in the same breath as people who are “fearful of voting.” Obama did not correct her. He did not say “hold on, only citizens can vote.” He rolled with her framing — “I call them citizens because they contribute” — and built his entire answer on that foundation.
2. The message to anyone watching was unmistakable.
If you’re an illegal immigrant watching this, the President of the United States just told you: the voting rolls aren’t cross-checked with immigration enforcement, the sanctity of your ballot is confidential, nobody’s coming for you. Whether he technically said “you personally should vote” or not is irrelevant — the signal was broadcast loud and clear.
3. The follow-up made it worse.
Obama went on: “What is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you’re not just speaking for yourself. You’re speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice, who can’t legally vote.”
The framing is clear — citizens should vote on behalf of illegals. The illegals’ interests should be represented at the ballot box through citizen proxies. That’s the soft-sell version. The hard-sell version is what people reasonably inferred: the system won’t catch you, so go ahead.
🧠 The Institutional Gaslighting Machine
What happened next was textbook. Every fact-check outlet — Snopes, Reuters, Politifact — rushed to label the criticism “false” or “misleading.” Their argument? Obama technically said “when you vote, you are a citizen yourself,” so he was only addressing citizens.
This is the same playbook they run every time:
- Take the most literal, narrow, autistic reading possible of what was said
- Ignore context, tone, audience, and signaling
- Declare critics “took it out of context” while themselves stripping all context
- Cite themselves as authoritative — Snopes citing Snopes, Reuters citing Reuters
It’s particularly rich when the fact-checkers claim the video was “edited” or “clipped.” The full interview is available. The full transcript exists. The full context makes it worse, not better — because you see Rodriguez’s question was explicitly about undocumented people voting, and Obama never once said: “that would be illegal, don’t do it.”
🗳️ The Broader Pattern
This 2016 moment doesn’t exist in isolation. It’s part of a larger architecture:
- Same-day registration in blue states with no meaningful ID requirements
- Motor voter laws that automatically register people at the DMV — including non-citizens in some states, “by accident”
- Jurisdictions allowing non-citizen voting in local elections (Maryland municipalities, DC’s attempted law, San Francisco school board elections) — creating confusion about who can vote where
- Democrats fighting voter ID laws tooth and nail — if illegals aren’t voting, why oppose the most basic verification?
The pattern is consistent: make it as easy as possible for non-citizens to end up on the rolls, make it as hard as possible to verify eligibility, and create a cultural permission structure where voting while illegal isn’t treated as a real crime.
🎯 The Takeaway
The Obama-mitú interview is a Rorschach test.
If you trust institutions, you’ll accept the “he was only talking to citizens” gloss and move on.
If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll recognize it for what it was: the President of the United States, four days before an election, signaling to a Latino audience that voting won’t trigger immigration consequences — with the very first words out of his mouth being a correction of the premise that he conspicuously never made.
He never said, “if you’re not a citizen, you cannot vote.” He never said, “voting illegally is a crime.” He never said, “don’t do it.”
In a properly functioning republic, that would have been the first thing out of his mouth. The fact that it wasn’t tells you everything you need to know.
🚨 OMG. ActBlue records claim that this 88-year-old woman in Michigan donated $150,000 THOUSAND DOLLARS across 5 years...
...as soon as she was told about it, she said, "HELL NO," she doesn't have that kind of money
Democrat candidates like Abdul El Sayed for Senate get TONS of the funds through ActBlue.
Multiple people, including @mattvanswol, have said THEIR NAMES are being used to funnel money to candidates
ACTBLUE MUST BE SHUT DOWN! They were recently even implicated in a scandal for allowing rampant foreign donations.
It's one massive FRAUD RING! @mich_enjoyer full video below
@EndWokeness The Shiloh Hendrix case sets the precedent that you can be harassed, pestered, and filmed but if you react at all you will be the one charged with disorderly conduct.
If you're White.
Their next step is to agree that there are large numbers of illegals voting (or usually getting harvested by Dem operatives who pick up their ballots and fill them out) and that it is a good thing and anyone who opposes it is racist
January: There's no evidence of voter fraud.
July: Ok, there's a some voter fraud but it's not widespread and the illegals who voted were just confused.
This is CNN.
🚨 Elon just nuked the entire media playbook in under 90 seconds.
Journalist: “You support the far-right!”
Elon: “No. You support the lunatic left.
What was completely normal 10-15 years ago is now called ‘far-right’…
because your side went completely insane.”
Safe cities. Secure borders. Biological reality. Common sense.
None of that is “far-right.”
It’s just not crazy.
The Overton window didn’t shift right.
The left sprinted off a cliff and started calling everyone who didn’t jump “extremists.”
Elon said it out loud.
And the media still can’t cope.
Lunatic left.
He’s 100% right.
@elonmusk 👏🏻
MIC DROP!🎤
Elon: “The fact, as you pointed out, is that a quarter billion people follow me. I think a lot more people actually like me than don’t, and I think a lot more people hate you and the media more than you realize.”
Now that election fraud is in the spotlight, this video is arguably the most concrete evidence that the Dems use illegals to cheat.
Flashback to 11/04/2016: Then President Obama openly encouraged illegals to vote in the 2016 election, and assured them that ICE and Federal law enforcement will NOT seek them out or deport them if they vote.
Just four days before the 2016 election, Obama told illegals to vote, and that he would not arrest them for it. Plain as day.
This is exactly why we need US MIL/ICE at polling stations in deep blue counties, because we need the illegals to be afraid to vote. We need the exact opposite of what Obama did in 2016. We need the illegals to know that if they try to cheat in our elections, they will be arrested.
Whenever someone on the Left says the Dems don’t cheat in elections, or that illegals don’t vote, show them this video. Obama openly told the illegals they were safe to vote.
TREASON!
The full Fifth Circuit has issued an extraordinary precedential order making clear that illegal aliens do not have a constitutional right to roam free in the United States during their removal proceedings.
You read that right. There are NO background checks for Congressional staff. H.Res 500 would require background checks and full disclosure of dual citizenship and employment of foreign nations for staff. No surprise to anyone that we are being fought every step of the way. You can help us make sure all Capitol Hill staff get background checks by calling your Rep!