Incidentally, I'll be happy to delete this if Palantir publicly commits never to build things that help the government violate the US constitution. And in particular never to build things that help the government violate anyone's (whether citizens or not) First Amendment rights.
"Something is happening."
"OH, WELL, would you look at the time, it's nothing-happens-o'clock-"
"Chudjak... I guess I should tell you. I took the battery out of your Happening Watch over a year ago..."
The first pick in the NBA draft will make around $10 million in one year.
Caitlin Clark will make $76,535.
That is wrong. Pay women what they deserve.
https://t.co/e4vWC7Acnd
@VitoComedy Also fwiw there is a YT policy against doxxing https://t.co/ffJolCBv9x
Again doxxing doesn't have a fixed definition so whether Google chooses to interpret a specific event as doxxing is up to their discretion, so as in all things the TOS is only broken if they say so
@VitoComedy Sorry man you are wrong about this one. Disagreeing with a term that doesn't have a strict definition is not "misinformation"
What counts as doxxing is a matter of cultural consensus, and whether it rises to the level of a crime is going to be heavily fact specific
@S0phie_Salt @Pepipopa Palestinians are not victims of genocide, at least not by any accepted definition. The only genocidal party involved is the one whose chartering documents include the elimination of Israel and arguably a call to genocide against all Jews, not just those in Israel
one of the problems with paintbrushes is that there is no conceivable way to explain to one of them why you should never under any circumstances accidentally make this image
There's no difference in the principle underlying AI covers vs NI covers. Like the Luddites before him, he's just mad that a machine can do it more efficiently
Microdosing Alcohol: What You Need to Know
There is a recent trend going around about taking alcoholic beverages at doses that most people would find imperceptible. It’s always important to remember that alcohol is not safe at any dose, and that it is a known addictive carcinogenic neurotoxin. Therefore we start out skeptical of any touted health benefits, and watchful about its possible long-term consequences.
With that said, microdosing alcohol is perhaps phenomenologically valuable. Take 3ml of red wine. Yes, 3ml, measured with a pipette. You can still get a very decent phenomenological datapoint that tries to make sense of its aroma and texture (look for the linalool!). But you are nonetheless only drinking 50th of what a standard wine cup would be.
In the microdose regime, alcohol has a subtle feel reminiscent of dissociation, delicate time distortion effects, and a hint of the sense of messing with death but doing it so gently that you’ll probably be fine. It’s a trip.
Microdose wine once a day, and over the course of an entire year you’ll go through a bottle of wine and a half. At a distance it seems that you are someone who “has a few drinks now and then”, but that would actually be dozens of times more in a single sitting than you are actually doing. Your use of alcohol is entirely different, and you experience its effects every day consistently.
Microdose wine once a week, and you’ll be having one cup of wine a year. And when you take it this way, seeing someone drink a whole glass of wine is like seeing hard core erotic pictures without any warning. It looks really excessive and unappreciative. And of course it’s then deeply surprising that people have “multiple” of those on a single night. Someone deeply used to the alcohol microdose regime tends to find it really strange how someone would have that kind of relationship with this drug.