Gue gak butuh bantuan tuhan versi kalian
Gue pernah ada di posisi kalian mengkonsumsi dongeng yang sama, takut sama 'ancaman' yang sama. Tapi bedanya, gue memilih untuk UPGRADE AKAL.
Gue milih jadi 'Kafir yang Bangga' karena sekarang gue punya otoritas penuh atas logika gue sendiri. Gue nggak perlu nunggu 'ayat' buat tahu mana yang bener, gue punya DATA, FORENSIK, dan SEJARAH.
Kalau Islam sampai ke zaman sekarang, itu bukan 'Kuasa Tuhan', itu cuma hasil dari sistem yang melarang orang buat berpikir kritis selama 1.400 tahun. Begitu akal dicolok ke internet dan sains, sistem kalian langsung Error 404.
Stay in your cage, I'll enjoy the view from the high ground
@BelialSyntax@papadesucree Musuh kebenaran itu akan selalu ada bro Tuhan ga akan membantu kek lu minta tolong sama orang Tuhan kok disuruh 🤣
Jadi cara memerangi mereka itu bukan seperti itu tuhan kasih cara lewat ayatNya dan kalo emang bukan kuasaNya islam mungkin tidak sampe ke zaman sekarang
'You hypocrites—you who ordinarily spit upon and defile the authority of the Vatican, yet the moment war draws near, you suddenly line up to drink from the well of the Holy See—the very well you yourselves have defiled!
You hypocrites! You are clever enough to read the weather and geopolitics, yet you fail to grasp the signs of the times!'
The Deir Dibwan/Binyamin area is a hotspot for livestock theft. The price of sheep in the West Bank has reached insane levels.
A mature Awassi sheep now fetches 2,500–4,000 shekels (approximately 1,000–1,100 USD)—a realistic market price in Israel and the West Bank for high-quality breeds (such as the Assaf breed, or premium stud/breeding stock). A single garage holding 15–20 sheep is effectively worth the price of a new car.
At Chesed L’Avraham—a new farm in Binyamin—the sheep are marked with ear tags and specific paint, allowing the owner to identify them immediately when a garage door is opened.
In the villages surrounding Ramallah, many two- or three-story houses feature ground-level garages used to conceal stolen livestock—stolen not only from Israelis but, at times, from fellow Palestinians as well. The sheep are shorn, their markings are removed, and by the following morning, they are sold in the markets of Nablus or Hebron.
This is not an isolated incident; in April 2026 alone, B'Tselem recorded an event in Khirbet Abu Falah (Ramallah District) where Israeli settlers broke into a Palestinian farm and stole dozens of sheep.
Conversely, there have been reports this month of the reverse occurring, indicating a reciprocal cycle of livestock theft in the area.
The mature Awassi sheep raised at Chesed L’Avraham have a live weight of 70–90 kg.
• At 22 shekels per kg, an 80 kg sheep is worth 1,760 shekels for slaughter.
• However, if the animal is a productive ewe, a superior stud ram, or a sheep with established breeding credentials and vaccinations, the black-market price can reach 3,000–4,000 shekels per head. They aren’t sold by the kilo as meat; they’re sold alive for breeding purposes.
That is why Battalion 202 and the Binyamin police are so seriously tracking them down—it’s not just about two or three sheep; it’s the equivalent of a small-scale bank robbery.
This week, Israeli soldiers and police tracked sheep stolen from an Israeli farm (Chesed L’Avraham) to the garage of a Palestinian mansion in a village roughly 15 km northeast of Ramallah.
The homeowners refused to open the garage. When they finally complied, the stolen flock was found inside.
The farm owner identified the sheep by their markings, and they were returned.
The moment I remember most vividly is when John Paul II, after being shot, immediately forgave Ali Agca from his hospital room at Gemelli Hospital. He asked the faithful to pray for and forgive "my brother who shot me, whom I have sincerely forgiven"—doing so unconditionally, without waiting for the perpetrator to repent, and without any dramatic invocation of retributive justice.
On December 27, 1983, after celebrating Mass in the chapel of Rebibbia Prison in Rome, Pope John Paul II personally forgave the man during a 15-minute meeting inside a prison cell. Ali Agca had been sentenced to life imprisonment for shooting the Pope on May 13, 1981, during a weekly general audience in St. Peter's Square.
The Pope held the hands of the man who had attempted to end his life, listened to the confusion of Agca—who was obsessed with the "Third Secret of Fatima"—and reaffirmed his forgiveness face-to-face. Agca himself later admitted to feeling a sense of awe at a moral strength that required no bodyguards or retaliatory weapons—the humility of a victim who refused to perpetuate the cycle of hatred.
https://t.co/FZNPaiz5yf
https://t.co/wrrf7VykZz
To clarify:
*Nostra Aetate* §4 (Second Vatican Council, 1965) states that God has not rejected the Jewish people. God’s gifts and calling to them are irrevocable (Romans 11:28–29)—a point that had not previously been cited by the Magisterium in relation to the Jews.
The Church rejects the charge of collective *deicide* (the killing of God) and condemns antisemitism.
The *Catechism of the Catholic Church* (CCC 839) also affirms a special relationship with the Jewish people.
The Vatican officially recognized the State of Israel and established full diplomatic relations on December 30, 1993 (the "Fundamental Agreement"). This involved diplomatic and political arrangements—covering matters such as church taxation, pilgrimage rights, the operation of Catholic schools, the *status quo* of holy sites, and the opening of a Nunciature in Israel and an Israeli Embassy in Rome (January 19, 1994)—but it was not a theological document concerning prophecy.
It does not constitute a theological endorsement of the 1948 founding of Israel as a direct fulfillment of biblical promises—as taught by Christian Zionism or dispensationalism, a theology which posits that the 1948 founding of Israel is literal proof of the fulfillment of the promise of the land, and that it must therefore be supported unconditionally, as it is believed to trigger Armageddon.
The Catholic Church officially rejects the theology that the Jewish people possess an absolute divine right to the land based on Old Testament covenants—at least in the sense understood by Christian Zionism. The Catholic Church reads the Old Testament in the light of Christ, not as a real estate map.
The Vatican supports a two-state solution (Israel and Palestine). The official position of the Holy See upholds Israel’s right to live securely within internationally recognized borders. To link *Nostra Aetate* directly to a theological endorsement of Zionism—or to the State of Israel as a fulfillment of prophecy—is an oversimplification.
✝️ GEREJA KATOLIK MENGAKUI: ALLAH TIDAK MENOLAK BANGSA ISRAEL!
Bangsa Yahudi tetap memiliki tempat khusus dalam sejarah keselamatan.
Karunia dan panggilan Allah tidak dapat dibatalkan (Roma 11:1, 29 | Nostra Aetate No. 4 | KGK 839)
Vatikan secara resmi mengakui Negara Israel, yang berdiri pada 1948 sebagai hasil perjuangan nasional bangsa Yahudi melalui gerakan Zionisme.
Sikap dan keputusan Vatikan ini sejalan dengan salah satu tujuan dasar Zionisme yakni mendirikan negara Israel di tanah leluhur bangsa Yahudi.
They rejected and spurned the authority of the Holy See, deeming the Bible alone to be the supreme authority.
Yet, once war broke out and their lives were on the line before warlords, they suddenly realized that the rhetoric of "Faith Alone" commanded no armies, possessed no diplomatic channels, and held no bargaining power at the negotiating table.
That was when they ran to our Nuncio—drinking from the very "well" they had spent so long spitting into.
While the Catholic Church stands by James 2:24, we have neither a moral nor an institutional obligation to serve as free security guards for ungrateful groups that reject our authority in times of peace yet beg for our diplomatic protection in times of crisis.
Let those who chose theological independence enjoy the logical consequences of that choice. Let them put their "Faith Alone" declaration to the test at the business end of a gun. Do not treat the Vatican as an emergency fortress.
He was the primary architect behind the Catholic Church’s movement for the "Purification of Memory" (*Purificatio Memoriae*), manifested through the revolutionary "Day of Pardon" (*Mea Culpa*) and the publication of the document *We Remember: A Reflection on the Shoah*.
During the Mass on the First Sunday of Lent in the Jubilee Year 2000 at St. Peter’s Basilica, John Paul II presided over a liturgy for the asking of forgiveness—the "Day of Pardon."
For the first time in its 2,000-year history, a Pope publicly sought forgiveness for sins committed by the "sons and daughters of the Church" over the centuries. He identified seven categories of historical wrongs, including:
The use of violence in the name of the truth (the Crusades and the Inquisition).
Divisions among Christians (schisms).
Sins against the Jewish people (antisemitism).
Violations against peace, the rights of nations, and other cultures and religions.
Violations against the dignity of women and racial unity.
Through the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews—which he established—the Vatican released official documents, ranging from *We Remember: A Reflection on the Shoah* to *Between Jerusalem and Rome*.
These documents explicitly condemn the Nazi genocide of 6 million Jews and acknowledge that, while Nazism was an anti-Christian, pagan regime, traditional anti-Judaic prejudice among some Christians in the past fostered an apathy toward the suffering of the Jewish people. The Vatican described it as "an act of repentance (*teshuva*)"—using the Hebrew term *teshuva* rather than a simple "sorry."
This was given physical expression when John Paul II visited Jerusalem and tucked a written prayer—a plea for forgiveness—into a crevice of the Western Wall; a tangible act that shattered deep-seated, medieval-era prejudices.
In Lourdes, France—physically ravaged by Parkinson’s disease and severe bodily frailty—he refused to hide behind the grandeur of a stage. *Totus Tuus* ("Totally Yours"), he journeyed to a place where he had entrusted his entire life to Mary.
As his physical voice grew weaker, his physical limitations—laid bare before the eyes of the world—became a powerful sermon on the dignity of human suffering (*Salvifici Doloris*).
Every October 22nd, the Church celebrates the feast of Saint John Paul II, the pilgrim Pope.
He traveled the world bringing the Gospel to all corners of the earth: 104 trips, 129 countries, millions of miles.
And his final journey took him to France. He returned to Lourdes—a place that held a special piece of his heart, the shrine of the Virgin Mary, to whom he had entrusted his entire life: Totus Tuus, “Totally Yours.”
Lourdes, in August 2004, was his final destination. Months later, he would depart for the Father’s house.
There, with his strength fading, he gave the world his greatest lesson. He preached not with a speech, but with his frailty. The world saw him pray with all his heart, in tears, unafraid to show his weakness before cameras from across the globe.
This giant sustained the Church and the world until his dying breath. Saint John Paul II, pray for us.
It’s pure comedy. Muslim scholars get free access to the Vatican’s priceless archival treasures, yet still demand dedicated prayer spaces inside the Pope’s library. Meanwhile, try walking into Mecca with a Rosary or holding a Mass in Saudi Arabia and see what happens to your 'hospitality'.
Rome literally gifted them land to build the largest Mosque in the Western world. If Catholic archives and 'infidel' institutions are so impure, stop begging for their facilities. Show some basic self-awareness: use the free resources, sit down, and don't demand special treatment from the very Church your home regimes persecute daily on the ground
They run to the Vatican to research ancient manuscripts for free, demand prayer rooms in the Pope's home, while back home their fellow believers forcibly closed, destroyed and persecuted the Church. If our well is 'infidel', stop drinking from our archives
https://t.co/pxOvs1skDr
https://t.co/2M5453PhZh
Netanyahu’s warning has proven precise: as anarchy paralyzes French cities, it becomes clear that the policy of "yielding for the sake of peace" is merely a spectacle of surrendering sovereignty. Radicalism—if not destroyed at its source—will inevitably spread to Paris and the rest of Europe; this reality is now playing out on the ground.
"You don't solve a problem like ISIS with diplomacy; you destroy them." How naive it is for Western elites to believe that a radical ideology can be tamed at a negotiating table.
The October 7th warning—"If we don't eliminate them here, you'll have them in Paris"—exposes the bankruptcy of Western diplomatic rhetoric when faced with radical ideology.
"I warned him Hamas would reach Paris."
The territorial unrest seen today serves as proof that a policy of appeasement toward radicalism always ends in the paralysis of the state.
https://t.co/YnPkSKLxui
The Startup Nation (21st Century) versus Territorial Ideology (7th Century).
The Sinai is the most striking example. Israel surrendered territory strategically and economically more valuable than the West Bank and Gaza combined.
It surrendered three Israeli-developed oil fields and the tourist potential of Sharm El-Sheikh, and the strategic position of controlling the Suez Canal for a mere paper promise (the Camp David Accords).
Internal Trauma: The IDF had to expel its own citizens (Yammit) and demolish their homes. This proves that for Israel, security is more important than the ideology of land.
A stable border with Egypt for over 40 years. This is a successful model that Israel has sought to replicate, but has consistently failed because its opponents have failed to guarantee security.
The Golan Heights is an example of where "land" has become secondary to "tactical position."
Offers to Syria have always failed because the Assad Dynasty needs an external enemy (Israel) more than anything else to maintain its internal legitimacy as a "defender" of the Axis of Resistance.
They chose economic ruin to remain part of the Axis of Resistance. This is an extreme failure of economic logic.
The 2005 withdrawal from Gaza was a "beta test" for the two-state solution:
Israel: Destroyed 21 settlements, withdrew all troops, and left behind a productive greenhouse infrastructure.
The result: Not state-building, but rather the transformation of Gaza into a rocket base. This is a data point that has made the Israeli public highly skeptical of any future peace promises. If "Land for Peace" in Gaza yielded results on October 7th, why should they try again in the West Bank, just a few kilometers from Tel Aviv?
How can Israel believe in peaceful intentions if the PA still funds the Martyrs' Fund (Pay for Slay) program?
In this system, the more Israelis killed, the greater the benefits the perpetrators' families receive. This is an economic incentive for terror. No startup nation would negotiate with an entity that funds the murder of its citizens.
Israel's wealth comes from human capital, semiconductors, desalination, and cybersecurity. This wealth resides in laptops and servers, not in land.
War is the ultimate enemy of startups. When reservists (who are engineers, CEOs, and scientists) are called to war, the economy grinds to a halt. Israel needs peace, not territorial expansion that only increases security costs.
Israel is willing to pay a high price for peace (as in the case of the $35 billion Leviathan gas contract to Egypt), because peace and the promise of security mean market stability.
However, when the opposing side still wields theological "knives" and pays people to kill, then "Land for Peace" is simply a scam script. You cannot exchange land for the promise of peace from those who ideologically view your existence as a mistake that must be erased.