@HebgenLakeMT@luke_mccown Yeah let's throw out the bible and 2000 years of christian teaching because a proven liar treasure seeker in 1800's says so with zero evidence or proof.
@sanderson1611@GabeKul You're a pastor?! Very sad you leading a flock talking like this. May God guide you to wisdom, truth, and repentance. Baptists and orthodox are saved christians.
@Sayitpop This is the result of of modern rap music and the internet. Got these dumb fucking Asian and white kids from good affluent homes idolizing retards and trying to play gangster. This Asian guy should be pre-med or some shit. But now hes saying Nigga and trying to punk 15 year old
@enor_mal@theBasedBarbie Yeah a sect of the cult of Mormonism. Hundreds of these kind of cults popped up around the same time period in the US. Its not even close to the same theology that Jesus and the Apostles preached.
@CarmineSabia No, we're arent going to welcome people that want to destroy all other relgions and our way of life. There is no freedom of relgion or tolerance in Islam. If we want to ensure the US has freedom of relgion in the future we must ban Islam.
@Abdul47471235@Suzierizzo1 No they worship Allah. A completly different God claiming to be the same. Jesus is lord. And we understand islam. Thats why we want nothing to do with it.
Dont cry over this. How does the Quran and hadith say to treat christians, jews, and Unbelivers?
🚨 HOLY SMOKES.
A heated exchange broke out over the SAVE America Act after someone argued that stricter voter ID or proof-of-citizenship rules would disproportionately impact minority voters.
A woman in the discussion pushed back hard, calling it offensive to suggest minorities aren’t capable of obtaining basic documents like a birth certificate or ID.
Her point was simple:
“If I need my birth certificate, I can get it. Online or by asking.”
That moment captures the core tension in this debate.
Supporters of the SAVE Act argue it’s common sense and that implying minorities can’t navigate basic documentation is patronizing.
Opponents argue that systemic barriers — cost, access, bureaucratic delays — can still create uneven burdens, even if individuals are fully capable.
The disagreement isn’t about intelligence.
It’s about access and impact.
Election policy debates hit deep because they touch identity, trust, and fairness all at once.
And when those arguments happen face-to-face, the tone can shift quickly. 🇺🇸
So many examples of Black male excellence, all alive today, and they choose to prop up a dead career criminal fentanyl junkie and a guy who’s in jail for stabbing someone to death.