On en parle de cette arnaque gigantesque qui nous force nous, entrepreneurs, à payer une plateforme privée pour distribuer nos factures aux clients ?
Dans quel cerveau malade ce parasitisme peut il naitre ?
Un pays géré par des fonctionnaires est un pays où règne la corruption.
‼️ZELENSKYY: IF UKRAINE BURNS, YOUR MOSCOW WILL BURN TOO.
“First off, about our response, which is totally fair, on Moscow. Well, you all see it, despite the three layers of air defense Moscow has, we said it before, - we would get to them. If Putin doesn't want to end this war and just wants to keep going, we won't just sit around quietly; we'll respond. The response has to be strong and fair. They (Russians) hit the Lavra (Cathedral). And afterwards during our meeting there with journalists, we were at the Lavra, and I said it very openly: we will prepare a response, and you'll see it. I think you can see it now. We don't want this war, and we never did. And everyone knows it, and our partners know it too. And we definitely don't want Ukraine to be burning because of the enemy. But if Ukraine burns, your Moscow will burn too”
Ukrainian President on Thursday, June 18, 2026
Ici, la manipulation consiste à prendre des études in vitro (des cellules exposées directement à des concentrations massives) et à les transposer à l’enfant qui boit un verre de menthe à l’eau.
Journalistiquement, écrire « potentiel génotoxique » sans préciser dose, modèle expérimental, niveau de preuve et exposition réelle relève du mensonge.
La définition de la folie c’est de faire sans cesse la même expérience et d’en attendre des résultats différents .
À Nantes la gare est un fiasco … mais all in pour faire les mêmes conneries avec le CHU .
Sélection naturelle ?
Faire le choix de risquer la mort de patients, plutôt que d'utiliser l'électricité décarbonnée des centrales nucléaires...
L'idéologie tue.
À Nantes, comme ailleurs. 😡
👍🏻 ! Mieux vaut tard que jamais : l’Europe vient enfin d’autoriser l’édition génomique et les plantes 🌱 NGT1 = des plantes plus résistantes à la sécheresse, à la chaleur, aux ravageurs…
Immense espoir pour notre agriculture ! 🇫🇷 🇪🇺 1/2
#adaptation
https://t.co/P2kS9fSm3s
"Dire à une femme enceinte : 'tu n'as besoin de personne, ton corps sait faire', et lui vendre juste après un programme à 7 000 euros pour lui apprendre à se passer de médecin, c’est d'un cynisme absolu."
Cet article est terrible à lire.
https://t.co/oJ8ay3X3fc
Un officier d'Etat civil qui coche la mauvaise case, fait d'une petite fille un garço n... Une erreur impossible à corriger et une avalanche de conséquences, révélant l'inertie de la machine administrative française.
https://t.co/9cjXhASzS5
In 1968, while teenage Red Guards beat their professors to death with clubs in Beijing courtyards, Jean-Paul Sartre sat in Paris calling Mao's Cultural Revolution a model of revolutionary democracy. The most celebrated intellectual in France looked at a country burning its own libraries and saw liberation. He sold the Maoist newspaper La Cause du Peuple on French street corners himself, holding it aloft like a sacrament.
Consider what he was endorsing. Between 1966 and 1976, the Cultural Revolution killed somewhere between 500,000 and two million people. Schools shut down across the entire country. Students dragged teachers onto stages, hung placards around their necks, forced them to kneel on broken glass, then murdered them. The historian Bian Zhongyun, vice-principal of a girls' school in Beijing, died on August 5, 1966, beaten by her own students with nail-studded clubs. Sartre called this the people governing themselves.
You should understand why a man this intelligent got it this wrong. Sartre believed knowledge served power, that truth was whatever the revolution required, that the individual existed to be dissolved into the collective will. So when Mao abolished the distinction between teacher and student, between expert and mob, Sartre cheered. He had spent decades arguing that bourgeois reason was a class weapon. Here was a regime taking him at his word and clubbing the reasoners to death.
This is what economic illiteracy buys you. A university, a price, a contract, and a peasant's grain stockpile all carry knowledge that no central planner can seize or replicate. Mises explained the calculation problem in 1920. Hayek explained dispersed knowledge in 1945. Sartre had access to both and chose the dunce cap of the collective instead, then handed out its propaganda on the Rue de Rennes.
He died in 1980, mourned by 50,000 followers, never having retracted a word about Mao. The professors of Beijing got no such funeral. They got a ditch, and a philosopher in Paris explaining that their murder was freedom.