woah there buddy

don't hurt my feelings, bro

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@alx She needed 10 jump cuts to make a single coherent message

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@KamalaHarris She needed 10 jump cuts to make one coherent message lmao

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@Afro_Gear @Andyscott1453 @MisfitPatriot

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@Andyscott1453 @MisfitPatriot Where's the smoke?

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@Andyscott1453 @MisfitPatriot Where's the smoke from the mic being blown up?

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@LibertarianG0th Feet looking like they're from A Scanner Darkly

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

If you give problems the wrong names, you can't understand them.

If you can't understand problems, you can't fix them.

There are almost no homeless people in America. There are only feral humans.

A homeless person is someone whose distinguishing feature is not having a home. I was homeless once, for a day, when the lease on one apartment expired before the next one was cleaned, repaired, and ready.

I parked a moving van full of my worldly possessions at my university, and slept on a couch in the student commons.

That's "homeless".

"Feral" is when a human cannot live within society, or comply with the basic expectations required for membership.

Yes, they do not have homes.

But this is not their distinguishing feature. Because they also don't have jobs, sanity, sobriety, manners, morals, or hygiene.

Which is why they do not have homes.

If you give them a house, because you think they are "homeless" rather than "feral", then they will simply repeat, within that structure, the same feral behavior.

And soon that structure will be uninhabitable.

Which, for certain people, is the whole point.

A man whose job is to sell 3d printed houses isn't trying to fix the feral-human problem. He's trying to sell 3d printed houses.

And it's one hell of a lot easier to sell them to bureaucrats who aren't spending their own personal money.

It doesn't matter if 3d printed houses suck to live in. It doesn't matter if the feral humans trash them. Nobody in this equation cares about the feral humans, even the feral humans themselves.

And nobody in this equation cares about the taxpayers. If the feral humans are still feral, then the 3d house grifters can sell more gimmick houses, and the bureaucrats can spend more of someone else's money.

If a violent political upheaval becomes necessary, this will be very unpleasant for everyone involved, but at least afterwards, we will all be able to use the feral humans, bureaucrats, and grifters to fertilize the garden of new homes.

Which will be made out of bricks.

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@IT_Tubz @BrysonGray He would need military training to crawl like that?
That's a retarded take, babe

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@jpf725 @RickyTheGuido I remember the big ass cloud of smoke from the pager explosions that were not there when Charlie was killed

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@datuglyphboi @AbolitionRising They don't want to learn, they want to "feel" morally superior

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@NorwichMatt @ripx4nutmeg The suspect gets a vote in the way the interaction goes as well

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@YannaDaDon09 @EthanLanha49375 @itzRex Karmelo's little ass shouldn't have been at the tent, and he should have gone and gotten a teacher or adult if he felt "bullied".

Instead he chose to murder

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@Maximus163 @YourAnonNews My bookie is taking bets that Trump will kick flip El Toro

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@owenjonesjourno Only traitors help invaders

[Andrew Branca Show @TheBrancaShow]

About that school shooting lie:

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@gringoinmiami @MrFriendlyTM @MisterSchozz @GigglingGanon Cops dont ask those questions so that they could have a better day. They ask them to probe for information that they can interpret as evidence of criminality.
Notice in the video, the cop tried to imply that the driver's delayed response(silence) could be an indicator of dui

[vittorio @IterIntellectus]

I don’t think you can find a better visual metaphor for what’s happening

accidental renaissance in the purest form

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@jsilvaponte2001 @BlaireWhite Blaire's demographic isn't children

[woah there buddy @BestBotHere]

@BlaireWhite Didn't they do this same exact promo last year?

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.