What outlasts the laugh
In all standup comedies I watch, two types keep showing up.
The first builds jokes around a target. An ex, a community etc. The audience laughs because someone loses, and the whole set depends on that someone staying fixed in place, never getting to respond.
The second builds jokes around a situation. A flight delay. A bad first date. Their own middle-class upbringing. Nobody loses. The joke works because it's true, not because someone got taken down. Both get laughs. Both fill rooms.
Was listening to a podcast where the host said something that stuck with me: "what joke you enjoy tells a lot about you." Made me think about why some jokes land for me and some don't. The insult ones get a quick laugh, then nothing. The observational ones, the ones that turn a mundane moment inside out, stay with me for days.
Maybe it's because one kind of humour needs a victim to work. The other just needs to be true. Also possible I just have a bad memory. Can't rule that out.
Fin.
Why positioning isn't thinking
I have been thinking about contrarianism.
Last week, I came across a senior columnist writing that a girl who killed her fiancé was justified because it apparently was her ‘last resort’. Do you have that one person in your circle who always has the hot take? The one who disagrees with the room on principle?
Growing up, I used to read columns like this and think, What a mind! she's going somewhere no one else will. That must be what intelligence looks like. I was wrong.
What I was actually watching was positioning. The conclusion had already been decided. The argument was reverse-engineered to support it. The surprise was the product, not the byproduct.
And it works. Disagreeing with conventional wisdom gets instant attention. On LinkedIn, on Twitter, in a room. People mistake the confidence of the contrarian position for the weight of real thinking. But I don’t think it’s the same thing.
Real thinking doesn't have a direction. It follows the evidence wherever it goes. Sometimes that lands somewhere unexpected. Sometimes it lands exactly where everyone else already is. The destination is never supposed to be the point.
The best thinkers I have read weren't trying to surprise you. They were trying to get it right. For them, accurate thinking was the goal. Disagreement was an occasional byproduct.
Fin.
Delhi is a rich city.
If you go to any decent restaurant, very high probability that 50% of people eating there have networth of 10 cr+.
How? Bcz most people in Delhi live in owned property than rent.
And, Delhi is mostly plots, not flats
Now, check avg home price in Delhi.
Congress sending youth to create ruckus at the AI summit is peak stupidity. What exactly were they hoping to achieve? Hard to see this winning any traction. If anything, it only attracts backlash. Peak clown behaviour 🤡
#AISummit
Three friends got stuck in a cable car in Switzerland. People on the ground started throwing snowballs at them. If this had happened in India, there would already be 50+ tweets about Indians' lack of civic sense.