THE MONTREAL SHOOTING: I Read The FULL MANIFESTO - Here’s What The Media WON’T TELL YOU!!
In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down the Montreal shooting at the Pornhub/Aylo headquarters carried out by Seth Scott Hatfield.
After reading his full 104-page manifesto, the story goes far deeper than the mainstream media’s “incel right winger” narrative.
Hatfield details how society shifted from monogamy to a hypergamous nightmare that he says is fueled by capitalism, the porn industry, dating apps, and elite control.
He condemns both left and right, calls for total state control over private property, finance, travel and information and he envisions robots replacing female jobs to restore monogamy, and even pushes transhumanism.
While Dan condemns the violence 100%, the uncomfortable truths about collapsing families, porn addiction, and a broken dating market cannot be ignored.
Watch until the end for the full analysis they don’t want you to hear.
Jérôme se vide le cœur avant qu’ont se fassent tous arrêter pour délit d’opinion dans la nouvelle dictature Canadienne de Mark Carney .
J’approuve ce message à 💯
🆘🇨🇦🆘 FUYEZ SI VOUS LE POUVEZ ‼️
🚨 MANIFESTO EXPLAINED
Seth Hatfield’s manifest has been released. Lots of different media outlets are framing it to fit their political agenda.
Did he hate Jews? Was he an Incel? Did he blame women?
Everything EXPLAINED 👇🏾 (No Bias)
This Canadian girl just said what millions are thinking but are too afraid to say out loud.
“Can somebody please tell me how we’re still calling Canada a free country?”
Then she laid out the receipts:
- We can’t access certain news channels without the government or platforms getting in the way.
- We can’t even pray in peace without someone trying to shut it down.
- Don’t fill out the census? Get fined.
- Someone breaks into your house? You can’t defend yourself properly — you can’t even hurt them without risking jail.
- We can’t own guns to protect our families.
- The government now decides what your kids can see on social media — not you.
- And we don’t even get to decide what goes into our own bodies… or our babies’.
This isn’t freedom.
This is a managed population.
Year after year, the Liberals chipped away at it — one “reasonable” restriction at a time — until regular Canadians started asking the question this woman is asking.
Mark Carney and the people running this country didn’t inherit a free nation.
They inherited one they could control.
And they’ve been very busy.
If this still feels like “Canada” to you, you’re either not paying attention… or you’re part of the problem.
Watch this.
Share it.
Then ask yourself the same question she did.
#cdnpoli #CarneyResign #LiberalFail #Freedom #ParentalRights #SelfDefense #NannyState
🚨 HYPOCRISY ALERT
Ben Stiller urged New Yorkers to “do something” about homelessness
Today he walked straight past a homeless man on the street like he didn’t exist.
“Are you enjoying a home right now?” Stiller asks. “Thousands of others can’t.”
Another Hollywood Fraud
#NEWS: The Montreal Canadiens OT winning goal celebrations last night caused a mini earthquake in Montreal. Experts from a local university say their sensors registered seismic activity measuring approximately 0.5 on the Richter scale.
NBA: need more load management.
NHL: need to shed my walking boot and play through a high ankle sprain so I can let the other team avenge that dirty hit I threw three weeks ago.
CBC seems aligned with Carney because it's publicly funded (~$1.4B/year from the federal government), and his Liberals pledged an extra $150M annually—creating a clear conflict critics highlight. Conservative outlets like National Post and Winnipeg Sun document softer framing on Liberal policies vs. scrutiny of opponents, while ex-producers have called out systemic pro-Liberal tilt. Supporters say it's just public-service journalism. The "seeming" comes from that structural incentive plus shared urban/globalist worldviews on trade/climate. Media bias debates are heated on all sides in Canada.
À Montréal entre Outremont et NDG, la Côte-Sainte-Catherine ressemble plus à un champ de cratères qu’à une route. Ça prend une réparation sérieuse!
Qui d’autre en a marre des trous?
⚠️ Warning: Extremely long post about the CFP — but it needs to be said.
Since the beginning of the College Football Playoff, there has been only ONE team that was in position to make the playoff, lost a conference championship game, had idle teams behind them, and did not drop in the rankings the following week:
2025 Alabama.
There have been only TWO teams total who were in CFP position, lost a conference championship game, and did not fall at all:
• 2022 TCU
• 2025 Alabama
Let’s talk about why those situations are not the same — and why the Alabama one is a problem.
⸻
2022 TCU
TCU was ranked #3 and lost the Big 12 Championship by 3 points in overtime.
The team directly behind them at #4 USC got blown out by 23 in their conference championship game.
If the committee dropped TCU to #4 and moved idle #5 Ohio State to #3, Michigan would have played Ohio State twice in three games, and OSU would have faced Michigan back-to-back.
That was a clear structural reason not to reshuffle the rankings.
⸻
Now compare that to 2025
This is where it gets uncomfortable.
• Both teams around Alabama were idle — yet Alabama doesn’t drop to #10
• Both teams around BYU were idle — BYU drops to #12
• Both teams around UVA were idle — UVA drops to #19
So let’s be honest:
Is dropping Alabama to #10 really “punishment” when they’re in either way?
Or are we protecting the ACC’s last at-large team by making sure no one sits between Miami and Notre Dame?
Because if Alabama drops to 10, suddenly there’s a problem the committee doesn’t want to solve.
And let’s be clear — that’s the ACC’s fault, not Notre Dame’s.
The ACC Championship tiebreaker was asinine. If Miami had been in the ACCCG and lost, does anyone actually believe they wouldn’t have dropped?
⸻
History is very clear
Conference championship losers have absolutely been passed by idle teams and missed the playoff:
• 2022 USC
• 2017 Penn State
• 2015 Iowa
• 2017 Auburn — beat Georgia three weeks earlier, then lost the SECCG and got jumped
So the argument that “Alabama beat Georgia earlier” is not a shield.
We’ve seen that exact scenario before — and it didn’t matter then.
⸻
Ranking position shouldn’t matter
Whether you’re ranked 1 or 22, the criteria should be applied the same way.
4-team playoff
12-team playoff
16-team playoff
The rules don’t change.
Yes, fringe teams will get squeezed sometimes — that’s the trade-off.
Playing a conference championship game gives you control:
• Win and you’re in
• Lose and you hope the cards fall your way
That’s how the system has always worked.
So stop with the “we can’t punish conference championship losers” narrative.
It’s simply false — and honestly, idiotic.
⸻
It gets worse when you look at the week before
Go back one week before the conference championship games.
Alabama got moved UP after a “great” 27–20 win over 5–7 Auburn — a team that was:
• Winless at home vs SEC teams
• Playing under an interim head coach
Why did Alabama move up?
Because leaving them at #10 would have caused issues if:
• BYU won
• Alabama lost the CCG
Suddenly the committee might have had to bump Alabama out.
So they preemptively solved the problem.
⸻
And the résumé argument doesn’t hold up
“Alabama beat four ranked teams in a row and has the best win of the year.”
No — they didn’t.
• Georgia dog-walked them last week, proving teams change
• Only two of those wins are still ranked
• Vanderbilt, Tennessee, and Missouri have ZERO wins over ranked teams
• Tennessee and Missouri have a combined ZERO wins over FBS teams with winning records
Those rankings were inflated by preseason bias.
⸻
So what’s actually going on?
Why can’t we question this?
There has been no rule change saying conference championship losers can’t drop.
This is not a Notre Dame problem.
This is a CFP problem.
And the longer we pretend otherwise, the worse the credibility gap gets.