"Nice bridge. It would be a shame if it burned down, exploded, or - God forbid - somebody got thrown off it, you know what I mean. Some of the local bridges are taking the precaution of contributing to a neighborhood protective fund run by the Don and his men."
Russia's giant size is no longer strategic depth, but an enormous weakness.
Long transportation is needed & can be attacked anywhere.
Russia can only defend a few spots.
Ukraine has invalidated Russia's whole strategy since the Napoleonic wars.
https://t.co/Ubo64lREzF
One lesson of the Trump years: the US signature on an international agreement is worthless. There was an agreement in place to govern the bridge. Trump repudiated the agreement at behest of a donor with a direct anti-public-interest stake.
@Graff2023@acoyne He is stating that we should let the market decide what we do. Let comparative advantage do its thing. Do not sacrifice it to industrial policy that picks favourites based on prestige.
There is precisely zero economic benefit in producing higher value-added goods. What firms want are higher *margins*, wherever they can get ’em — it doesn’t matter where in the value-added chain.
The value-added fallacy is one of the oldest and most pernicious in economics. It’s a form of industrial snobbery: the kind that leads people to lament being “hewers of wood and drawers of water” in the country with perhaps the greatest supplies of both in the world.
“(Justice) Loo chose not to place Singh on the national sex offender registry after hearing that he faces potential immigration consequences.”
It almost feels like the courts are mandated to give lenient sentences to non-Canadian criminals.
https://t.co/B5hu8TmSgH
We've become remarkably desensitized to Trump's rhetoric. Declaring the Iran ceasefire "over," threatening to end all trade with Spain, calling Japan an "Islamic Republic"—a few years ago, each would have been a major story. Now they barely register. Why?
@brew56200@MichaelAArouet This illustrates the problem with wealth taxes. Unused land or a closed factory produces nothing (not wealth according to this definition). If anything, an unused capacity tax makes more sense. I said cash isn't real wealth, but we already have inflation (a tax) on that.
@brew56200@MichaelAArouet The productive capacity of a nation IS its real wealth. Money is only IOUs to claim products of that capacity, valued based on how much money there is compared to that capacity. Also public shares are easy to partially liquidate. Private shares and land are not.
@brew56200@MichaelAArouet Entrepreneurs' wealth is almost all in shares of their companies. If they are public companies, the shares are valued based on retained earnings PLUS the present value of what investors think future earnings will be. With private companies auditors would decide.
Today marks the technical start of the Ontario Liberal leadership race.
And that's why I've published my vision, "Ontario Can Still Win", built around three clear priorities:
- A competitive economy
- A capable government
- A new generational contract
Platforms rarely win elections, and I know few people will read the whole thing. That’s not the point, it’s the ideas and debate that matter.
The platform is organized into 12 sections, each with 3 goals: youth, seniors, the economy, democracy, housing/municipalities, health, education, energy, the north and rural Ontario, transportation, welfare, and justice and immigration.
Region specific, and party-specific ideas are still to come.
Within the platform, there are many ideas I believe are common sense. Some are provocative because real debates are worth having. I am open to changing my mind.
Ultimately, we need to confront why Ontario, a place blessed with extraordinary advantages, has stopped working the way it should.
So, please explore the topics that matter to you.
Challenge them, help me improve them, and let's build a renewed liberalism: rooted in its best history, grounded in enlightenment values, and oriented toward progress, development, order, and the future.
Ontario can still win! https://t.co/v0ZdiXJ8Yo
My timeline is full of tweets like this.
My genuine question. What constitutes adequate funding of public health care?
Public health care expenditures, as a % of GDP, have gone from 5% to 8% in my lifetime. How high is it supposed to get before we have a non-broken system?
@hollyanndoan@NationalDefence@CanadianForces Nuclear subs are an existing thing that is zero-emission, as well as able to run submerged until food runs out. We went with diesel there.
But we will pay $1.2m to study the feasibility of developing armoured EVs that will need to charge in enemy territory.