During the upcoming holiday, sales taxes will be lifted on select clothes priced $100 or less, school supplies $50 or less, learning aids $30 or less, and personal computers and accessories priced $1,500 or less. https://t.co/N8kZ6cucVr
Xbox could launch its disc-to-digital conversion system as soon as next week
“Project Positron” would turn eligible physical games into digital licenses
Introducing StockX Mystery Boxes — experience the thrill of the reveal with curated boxes packed with sneakers, apparel, accessories, and collectibles, all backed by real market data and verified by StockX.
Every reveal is a surprise, and each box adds something new to your collection. The real game-changer? Every item is worth at least the purchase price of the box, so you never take a loss.
Check the odds upfront, unbox the unexpected right away, and decide if you want to keep it. If you’d rather not keep it, sell back for up to 90% in StockX Credit, valid on any purchase across the marketplace.
Now available in the U.S.
The #2 overall pick Darryn Peterson SHOWED OUT in his Salt Lake City Summer League debut!
🎶 28 PTS (game-high)
🎶 5 REB
🎶 2 BLK
🎶 4 3PM
@utahjazz win in overtime over the Hawks!
That wasn't the issue before the Court though: just prosecution for mere possession. Those are related, but not the same issue. It sounds logically inconsistent but we are looking at gun purchase vs. gun possession and drug use vs. possession. Technically, you could purchase a gun and possess pot - just not use pot. Said another way, you cannot use pot and purchase a gun (without lying on a 4473). But according to this decision, using/possessing grass while also possessing a gun you've already legally purchased is not automatically a crime in and of itself.
This is big, but not "all marijuana users can all have guns now.” The Court held that the government cannot automatically prosecute someone merely because he regularly uses marijuana and possesses a gun. Rather, addiction, current intoxication, dangerousness, or misuse is the standard. From the opinion directly: "The Court’s decision is narrow. It does not address efforts to ban addicts or those presently intoxicated from possessing a firearm [or ] individualized proof that the defendant’s drug use renders him a danger to himself or others, or proof that a certain drug always renders its users dangerous."
Today we’re introducing a new product in @GoogleWorkspace to give you even more creative control. 🎨
Google Pics is an image creation and editing tool that can help you create just about anything — from party flyers to infographics. Pics automatically segments objects in your photos and understands how they work together, so you can make edits in just a few clicks.
#GoogleIO