@did8hurtu I do which is why I understand the arctan dependence on angular size. You put the sun there which doesn’t demonstrate this dependence because you are an idiot grifting liar.
@did8hurtu Knows as the 2nd law of B flats idiocy. Gotta mislead to try and make any points. Existence of gradient laughs at your feeble flerf excuses. Not even a good grifter. Good job. Keep it up
@plain_see Thanks for demonstrating you don’t understand the measurement, couldn’t handle the math nor derive the method from simple geometry. All you got is clip that doesn’t address my measurement. Good job, keep it up.
@truthache68 The alternative is that the moon is only thousands of feet in altitude which flys in the face of all other experience, much less actual measurements. Why would you hold on to this possibility
@ESO Another great time-lapse image of a planet-forming nebula. This one is called Gomez's Hamburger; it's 900 light years away.
Look at all the motion (including moving stars) over 21 years!
Images: Hubble. Processing: Judy Schmidt
Flat earthers will spend all day talking about the sky, the stars, and make all kinds of claims that those observations are not supported by the globe
Until you actually show evidence then it’s immediately “I don’t look at the sky to determine the shape of the ground”
@sashuwa77246 That look is just disbelief that you posted the same dumb discredited recycled talking point instead of engaging with science and evidence.