@Trianftn You give a value to each shot based on how likely it is to go in. Bad shots are not worth a lot, good shots are. Add it up and you get how many goals you "should" score with the shots you got
@RealRickBennett@itsmrbarrel 1. They tested a full 3D zone, but it led to more inconsistent and questionable calls, so they decided to go with 2D zone, which ended up closer to the zone we know. (Screenshot from MLB dot com)
2. Angel Hernandez had an error margin of 1/6 of a mile
3. See 2nd screenshot
I always saw future considerations as
"Hey, thanks for doing me a solid. If you ever need a backup AHL goalie in a pinch or something, just let me know."
Don't know if true. But I like to think that it is.
Note:
As you may have noticed, PuckPedia no longer uses the misleading term of "future considerations" on tweets.* If the trade is for nothing, that's what we'll call it.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
*We still write "future considerations" on the site so the one side of the trade isn't blank
Overpriced garbage jerseys. Monopoly control. Declining quality and zero accountability.
Inspired by @BabzOnTheMic's movement exposing Fanatics for what it is.
Finishing what @GearGoneWrong failed to do after the Michael Rubin payoff.
This scam ends now. #EndFanatics