BioAndy

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

https://t.co/YX3y5OOTYF

[wicklowwomen4women @wicklowwomen4w1]

Welcome to our conference!
The wonderful - and totally indefatigable - Róisín Michaux came and here's her overview of the event. It gives a glimpse into how much energy there was in the room.
Thank you milles fois, Róisín!

We're going to be posting full versions of the speeches on our own new YouTube channel shortly.
@RoisinMichaux
@HJoyceGender
@kenoflynnTD
@el_nagashi
@AthenaForumEU
@AdamsSandr4794
@TheCountessIE
@paddyjogorman
@stellaomalley3

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@LGBTQPrideUK @thefempire50 Nope, it was originally coined as a slur.

[Miss Jo @therealmissjo]

Imagine you are a dental hygienist and live in Sweden..

You are employed to help “migrant children” with their dental issues.

As part of your job you examine the wisdom teeth development of the kids and you notice that 80% of those “kids” have fully formed wisdom teeth, implying they are not kids at all but adults older than the age of 18.

You tell the Swedish Migration Agency and they advise you to put it in writing.

When you send exact details, with examples of specific patients you are suspended, investigated and fired for disclosing private information relating to patients.

This happened to Bernt Herlitz in 2017.

When he appealed the unfair dismissal he ultimately lost and was fined about $50,000.

He and his family faced financial hardship and almost lost their home, until some generous benefactors raised money for him. Bernt remains unemployed today, despite staff shortages for dentists in his area in Gotland.

At the time, Sweden scoffed at the tests and claimed they were “discriminatory” but since then they have quietly brought in mass dental testing, for those whose age is in doubt, by the National Board of Forensic Medicine.

Bernt deserves a medal. Not vilification and unemployment.

[Declan Ganley @declanganley]

From the below report it seems RTÉ, Ireland’s state broadcaster, and Children’s Books Ireland (a state-funded national charity) are actively promoting the 'Read with Pride 2026' guide to children and teenagers as young as 15. One of the books they recommend, 'What’s the T?', contains explicit, step-by-step instructions on how to perform anal sex, including advice on lubrication, douching, and other sexual acts. Let me be crystal clear about what this actually means under Irish law. The age of consent in Ireland is 17. Full stop. Under Section 17 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017, it is a criminal offence for any person to engage in a 'sexual act' with a child under 17. 'Sexual act' is explicitly defined to include anal penetration. Consent is completely irrelevant. A 15-year-old cannot legally consent to any sexual activity – vaginal, oral or anal. If the act takes place, the older person is committing the offence of defilement of a child / sexual act with a child. There is a very narrow “close-in-age” defence only if the accused is less than two years older than the 15-year-old and the relationship is not exploitative. Anyone older than that has no legal defence. In plain English: if a 15-year-old follows the instructions in the book RTÉ & Children’s Books Ireland are pushing, & has anal sex with someone outside that tiny exemption, the person having sex with them is committing a serious criminal offence; what the public rightly calls statutory rape. This is not 'inclusion. This is not 'education'. This is state-linked & funded organisations normalising & providing how-to guidance on sexual acts that are *illegal* when carried out with children under 17. If it's not technically grooming, it's its next door neighbour. Taxpayers and TV Licence payers are funding this. RTÉ is broadcasting it. Children’s Books Ireland, which receives public money, is publishing the list. The Government cannot pretend this has nothing to do with them. When the state broadcaster and a state-funded body promote material that, if acted upon by its stated target audience, minors, would involve the commission of a sexual offence against that minor, it is a matter of the utmost public concern. Parents have a right to know. The Oireachtas has a duty to act. And the Minister responsible cannot simply shrug and say “parents should decide”. This has to stop. Defend the innocence of our children.
#ProtectIrishChildren

[The Countess @TheCountessIE]

This is a post from an Irish trans activist - a man who “identifies as a woman.” The irony of this post is quite obvious.

Biological sex is not a legal fiction. It is binary and immutable. It is a material observable reality, determined by chromosomes, gametes, and reproductive anatomy.

Gender identity is a legal fiction, created by the Gender Recognition Act 2015 for administrative purposes. It does not, and cannot, alter biological fact.

A certificate doesn’t change a man into a woman.

It doesn’t erase male strength or male physical sex characteristics.

The GRA enabled self ID with minimal safeguards. It undermines women’s sex-based rights.

Courts affirming biological reality (like UK SC) isn’t “bullshit.” It’s acknowledging science over ideology.

Lies don’t become facts when they’re legalised.

Women didn’t fight for decades for sex-based rights only for them to be dissolved by statutory declarations.

Sex is real.

Gender identity is a social construct- unstable and prone to change over time.

Transwomen are male, despite the protestations of the OP.

[Róisín Michaux @RoisinMichaux]

Another woman's job is being threatened over her gender critical views. This time, Agnes Wold in Sweden.

Agnes Wold is a much-loved public intellectual in Sweden who is known for her feminism, her level-headed response to the COVID lockdown hysteria (she’s a bacteriologist), and, more recently, for refusing to go along with the transgender dogma that has gripped Swedish bureaucratic, activist, media and political elites.

On 20 May, the Swedish parliament approved an amendment to the law that criminalises “psychological violence” and “coercion” relating to “gender identity or gender expression (such as conversion practices)”, among other things. It is widely understood to be Sweden’s version of a conversion therapy ban (a more explicit law is likely if the left coalition gets into power in September).

Speaking on a radio programme about the law, Wold told the host that she would take 4 years in prison— the penalty for trying to prevent someone from leaning into their opposite-sex, delusion — before she would allow the gender transition of a grandchild (hard agree).

This comment set off major drama, with one famous gay media guy calling her the Swedish equivalent to “old hag” or “old crone”. Specifically, he said “get rid of the old hag. It is unethical of Sveriges Radio to give her access to a microphone,” which is a way of saying she should be fired from her public radio job.

Many, many people have called for Agnes Wold to be fired throughout the trans-mania era, and a lot of them seemed to be hoping that this comment would be the final nail in her coffin. But the remarks seem to have the opposite effect. Not only did Swedish people get very offended by this little shithead calling their beloved based radio-granny an old hag, they started to ask questions about the law that she was criticising.

And that, boys and girls, is how the omerta on the trans mass derangement got partially lifted in Sweden, and suddenly everyone started to ask: wait, what? Some kids think they’re in the wrong body and you can go to jail for telling them to snap out of it? Yes, dear Swedes, that’s what’s happening. Welcome to the conversation. We’ve been expecting you.

As of writing, Wold still has not yet been fired.

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@IgorRriabov @RichardDawkins You seem to be confusing science with science fiction.

[RealIrishNews @RealIrishNews]

Mainstream Media's Sexualization of a 16-Year-Old 'Drag Queen' Crosses into Dangerous Territory That Could Be Described As Pedophilic.

The Irish Examiner's glossy feature on Stephen Pierce the 16-year-old TikTok performer known as "Felony" sitting his Leaving Cert exams is not journalism, it's normalized exploitation.

The accompanying image shows this underage boy in full dominatrix drag, a blonde wig piled high, heavy theatrical makeup, a revealing corset top, long black opera gloves, a sparkling choker, and dramatic posing alone in an empty school exam hall at Edmund Rice College in Carrigaline, Cork.

This isn't "self-expression."
It's a mainstream newspaper platforming highly sexualized imagery of a literal child, a minor still in secondary school, dressed in fetish-coded clothing for public consumption.
The tight-laced bodice, gloves, and sultry gaze evoke adult BDSM aesthetics, not exam-season relatability.
Legacy media's eagerness to celebrate this under the banner of "inclusion" reveals a profound disregard for boundaries.
When outlets frame a 16-year-old boy in dominatrix style as aspirational content, complete with professional photography in a taxpayer-funded school setting, it doesn't just blur lines it borders on pedophilic grooming territory.
Pedophilia centers on the eroticization of minors.
By dressing up and photographing a child this way, then splashing it across a national news site for clicks and virtue-signaling, editors are actively participating in the sexual objectification of youth.

TikTok's "Felony" persona already trades in provocative adult drag performance, mainstream validation in a school context legitimizes exposing impressionable peers (and online audiences) to this hyper-sexualized presentation during one of the most stressful periods of adolescence.

Parents should be furious.
Schools are for education, not fetish cosplay backdrops.
The pattern is clear: media prioritizes trendy gender narratives over protecting childhood innocence, often at the expense of vulnerable teens influenced by social media. This isn't harmless visibility it's cultural grooming that confuses minors about sexuality, maturity, and appropriate boundaries.

The Irish Examiner and its enablers aren't reporting news, they're manufacturing it!!!!

Until outlets face accountability for sexualizing children under the guise of progress, expect more of these articles and more damaged boundaries for the next generation.

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@RealIrishNews @GrannyCahill "Pedophilia centers on the eroticization of minors."

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@LGBTQPrideUK @thefempire50 Then why did you call us radical Feminists in the first place?

[Róisín Michaux @RoisinMichaux]

Single-sex services for women are disappearing in Europe. Here's how it's being done:

There are two main ways via which single-sex spaces and services are slowly going extinct in Europe. The first one is, obviously, by allowing anyone to identify as the opposite sex. Once a male person is in a female-only space, let’s say a youth hostel dorm room for example, it is no longer a women-only dorm room. It is a mixed-sex dorm room. He may have had his nads removed, or he may even be wearing a dress covered in flowers. It is a mixed-sex dorm room once both males and females are allowed to sleep in it.

If you tried to get such a man out of the room, and return it to its status as a women-only space, you would be accused of discrimination against him on the basis of his gender identity (though depending on your legal jurisdiction, which in turn depends on the speed at which your country’s equality legislation is being transed, this may still be called discrimination on the basis of “gender” or even sex-via-gender reassignment, even if the “reassignment” involves nothing more than the flowery dress).

If a company, or service of any kind, tries to maintain a single-sex policy, they will likely have to battle it out in court as soon as a disgruntled transvestite sniffs out their heresy. And so in order to avoid being dragged to court by such men (and such women), companies and services are pre-empting legal action by just making everything mixed-sex, like the Germans are planning to do in new building regulations. Problem solved.

And while the end of women-only yoga classes might not bother you that much, there are some services that really (really really) need to remain sex-based, and they are underpinned by the same equality laws that are currently under threat.

First a little background: equal treatment laws are mandatory in EU countries. I can’t refuse to sell a man an ice cream from my ice cream van, just because he’s a man. You can’t refuse to polish a woman’s Fabergé egg because you only polish men’s Fabergé eggs.

Except, and this is crucial, sometimes you can discriminate on the basis of someone’s sex. And I bet you can guess what those circumstances are. It must be, as the TERF Islanders put it: “a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim”. This teeny tiny caveat, variously worded, carries the weight of women’s safety and dignity in public spaces and services in European countries. You can deny a man access to a women’s prison or rape crisis centre, and you can refuse to hire a man for a job in (for example) a residential care home if that job involves washing the intimate parts of delirious old ladies or intellectually disabled children (whose families can request female-only intimate care).

Do you know why a family of an old checked-out woman might wish for their mother’s genitals be tended to by someone female? You bet you do. Not All Men yadda yadda yadda. Save it for yer wife. Enough men are . that even gender-equal Scandinavian utopias can legally advertise for those jobs for women only. And men also have the right, for privacy reasons, to wish only to have men tend to their bits. And that’s utterly reasonable.

But by expanding equality protections to include men masquerading as women and vice-versa, the burden is on the management of such facilities to justify why they are excluding variously-identified people. The only country that has gone to court to establish in law that sex refers to biology, not identity, is the UK, but service providers eager to please noisy activists are ignoring it, leading to a bit of a crisis. Oh you’ve not read about this major policy issue in the newspaper, or seen a debate about it on the news? That’s not an accident.

Men stayed out of women’s spaces because both society and the law punished them if they did not. That norm is disappearing, and the law is disappearing — or being tortuously reinterpreted into nothingness — along with it.

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@fitzcavendish @laoisedebrun Drag used to be adult entertainers, entertaining adults. What is it now?

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@james_ferrari @getstuffedtwit @mashakleiner Many gender non conforming children will grow up gay. They are are led to believe they might be the opposite sex. Not gay. The new gay conversion therapy. Gender ideology is extremely homophobic.

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@james_ferrari @getstuffedtwit @mashakleiner I have said anything that indicates that I am homophobic?

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@james_ferrari @getstuffedtwit @mashakleiner Yes, I was referring to gender ideology which is the main form of propaganda in schools.

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@SVPhillimore @WomensSocIre Not my favourite approach but if making GRCs so meaningless that nobody wants one anymore & parents realize their little boy will never be able to use women's spaces & races even if they sterilize & mutilate him, then OK!

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@james_ferrari @getstuffedtwit @mashakleiner Children being taught they can change sex if they don't like being the sex they are has nothing to do with relationships (except maybe teaching them that same sex attraction is wrong).

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@daniellismore "And others" Mmmm 🤔

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@TheCountessIE Girls wouldn't dress like this to sit their Leaving. Superintendents wouldn't dress like this to supervise the Leaving. A monster has taken over!

[BioAndy @BioAndy2]

@itsmyname591 @helenstaniland Doesn't matter Felix, it's the law. Same for men, if they want to stop women in their bathroom you don't have the right to override them.