Hey @GoodCryptoApp
Can your tools be used for the following scenario on Hyperliquid:
I have a BTC short open.
Close the short if BTC reaches 80k.
Reopen the short if BTC falls below 80k.
If so, which combination of automated orders types would handle this for me.
Thanks.
@astronomer_zero@ktksiojsn Astro, you seem to be breaking all your own sensible rules. Doubling the size of your trade, then keep moving the stop lower multiple times.
These are the same bad decisions that I make sometimes. It rarely works out well.
🦔Meta is hiding $30 billion in AI infrastructure debt off its balance sheet using special purpose vehicles, echoing the financial engineering that triggered Enron's collapse and the 2008 mortgage crisis. Morgan Stanley estimates tech firms will need $800 billion from private credit in off-balance-sheet deals by 2028. UBS notes AI debt building at $100 billion per quarter "raises eyebrows for anyone that has seen credit cycles."
The Structure
Off-balance-sheet debt through SPVs or joint ventures is becoming the standard for AI data center deals. Morgan Stanley structured Meta's $30 billion in an SPV tied to Blue Owl Capital, making it easier to raise another $30 billion in corporate bonds. Musk's xAI is pursuing a $20 billion SPV deal where its only exposure is paying rent on Nvidia chips via a 5-year lease. Google backstops crypto miners' data center debt, recording them as credit derivatives.
My Take
This is 2008-style financial engineering repackaged for AI. The key difference from the dot-com era is growth was financed with equity then. Now there's rapid capex growth driven by debt kept off balance sheet. When chips estimated to last five to six years may be obsolete in three, and companies structure deals where their only exposure is short-term leases, that's hidden leverage creating the opacity that preceded past crises. Meta keeping $30 billion off its balance sheet while UBS warns about $100 billion quarterly AI debt buildup shows the pattern I've been documenting where leverage accumulates outside traditional visibility.
Hedgie🤗
Yesterday’s longs at 110k are now back to break even after the drop to 106k.
This is obviously good news, but they now feel like late longs that are at risk of being flushed.
So my question is, if you did not have an open position already, would you now open longs at 110k after yesterday’s drop and bounce?
@BullyDCrypto Same goes for accounts that post a chart and something short and vague like:
- We all know what this means
Or
- Big move coming soon
Total clowns!
@CredibleCrypto I get that sensible stop losses are required, but seems they failed in a lot of cases where the MMs pulled liquidity from the exchanges
@CredibleCrypto What advice would you have for traders who now realise that even a 2x leveraged position can be wiped out?
Never using leverage again isn’t a realistic solution, but how can users trust the system/market if they can be wiped out even when being ultra cautious?