Bitcoin Layers has been acquired by @blockspace. Our founder, Janusz, will be joining Blockspace as an advisor as a part of the transaction.
The integration will enable Bitcoin Layers to expand its onchain data suite and revamp its research platform.
Blockspace is pleased to announce the purchase of premier Bitcoin data site @BitcoinLayers.
Bitcoin Layers will be integrated into a forthcoming data product from Blockspace, encompassing all Bitcoin Layers (from tradfi to onchain).
We'll be working with @januszg_ and various foundations, startups, and investors to better understand the world of Bitcoin-related assets.
Read the announcement in the article below ๐
COLD CARD BITCOIN WALLET GIVEAWAY!
We're teaming up with @COLDCARDwallet to do another unit giveaway. All you need to do is...
1) Follow @blockspace
2) Retweet & comment "opnext" below
3) Like this post!
We will pick a lucky winner of a Cold Card & a GA ticket to @OPNEXT2026!
BITCOIN TECH CONF FLASH TICKET GIVEAWAY!
If you want to join BlackRock, Blockstream, Bitcoin Core and other leading Bitcoin tech companies at @OPNEXT2026 for free, simply...
๐ธ Follow @blockspace
๐ธ Repost this X post
๐ธ Comment "OPNEXT"
my initial review on @citrea_xyz can be found below
https://t.co/YQ6Mj9VlBL
tl;dr: citrea is a bitcoin sidesystem that uses bitcoin for data availability making it a bitcoin rollup
it is an independent network with its own full node software. citrea advances its state by applying state transition logic over a set of transactions posted to bitcoin by the citrea operator (known as a sequencer)
citrea full nodes initially gather blocks directly from the sequencer, execute them, and generate a new state root
the sequencer then posts differences in state to bitcoin and full nodes verify that the state update posted to bitcoin matches the state they generated locally
and every so often, a prover posts a validity proof to prove that the state transitions were executed correctly to finalize the full nodes view of the rollup as well as light clients
to move bitcoin onto the network, citrea uses the clementine bridge which is an implementation of bitvm2
the clementine bridge vault has two primary spend paths
the first sees 10, institutional signers, who participate in a 10-of-10 multisig set up, collectively spend funds out of the bridge vault contract to process withdrawals in the happy path
clementine also contains an additional spend path where a 3-of-5 security council can spend funds out of the bridge vault contract
in the event of one of the signers being unresponsive, or malicious, citrea leverages a bitvm-style game to enable operator-fronted withdrawals
an operator kicks off the bitvm game by requesting a reimbursement transaction. in the transactions i analyzed, the kick off transaction was followed by two transactions where the corresponding utxo was spent by 1) a presigned tx spendable by the aggregate musig2 key from the clementine signers or 2) the clementine security council
both script trees also contained an unrevealed path which most certainly contains the presigned transaction tree for the clementine bitvm protocol
citrea is the first implementation of a bitcoin rollup, with an official bridge program, on bitcoin mainnet
based on my findings, it does in fact use a bitvm-style protocol as outlined in its documentation site
the network has training wheels on, but it's extremely promising to finally have a bitcoin rollup on mainnet with a verifying bridge!
some news: @blockspace has acquired @BitcoinLayers
the acquisition will enable bitcoin layers to expand its data capabilities
we already have some great progress on this front courtesy of @khunpleb
weโll also be working on revamping the research portal and expanding it past bitcoin l2s and bitcoin-backed assets
truthfully, it will be a 10x on what we were doing before
iโm excited to work with @cbspears, @wsfoxley, and co. to get bitcoin layers to where it shouldโve always been
i do want to thank everyone; the l2 teams, crypto projects, various conferences, and ecosystem friends for giving us a chance at building a neutral platform for this emerging category
and i want to thank @redvelvetzip for joining me on this journey. i also want to specifically thank @alexeiZamyatin and @0x_orkun for giving me the motivation & confidence to start the project over two years ago and personally supporting me during the early days
what i see as the main difference between @arkade_os and @flashnet
let's say a user has an offchain utxo (leaf or vutxo) and wants to do some crazy shit
to support this, flashnet uses an intent model where users send funds to an address controlled by validators. if intent is valid, the validators take a key share and pass it to the flashnet signer. if m-of-n validators pass the key share for the intent, the signer executes the transaction
arkade extends their virtual mempool to support co-signing for more complex scripts. i.e., the arkade signer is able to sign off on things more complex than bitcoin scripts. a user needs to co-sign this execution, but model requires an honest signer for all offchain actions (like any out-of-round transaction)
flashnet is an "at execution" custody risk. after execution, (in most scenarios) a user returns to a statechain model, meaning they have a pre-signed exit path for their utxo
arkade has users remain in a "preconfirmed" state during all of this execution. post-execution, they can participate in a settlement transaction on bitcoin to gain full self-custody of their funds
both models use TEEs for signing execution
in flashnet, m-of-n validators need to collude and/or the TEE signer needs to be compromised to steal user funds
in arkade, the TEE needs to be compromised and previous owners within a specific vtxo tx chain need to collude with the TEE
i don't know which is *better* - just a different approach
someone asked for a @BitcoinLayers review on @arkade_os. i'll do it later but tl;dr
custody - green
tx data - green
operator - dark red
finality - green or yellow
very good. congrats team
All in all, statechains are neat protocols where users retain pre-signed unilateral exit paths. But:
- Users trust operators to delete keyshares post transfer
- All transfers are completely public (no privacy)
- LN payments are done via centralized swap providers
Wallet of Satoshi is not (technically) a Lightning wallet. It uses a network, known as Spark, on the back end.
Spark is a statechain. Let's go through a few of the assumptions:
To pay LN invoices, Spark leverages centralized operators who facilitate LN swaps on users behalf. These swaps are atomic, meaning the swap provider can't steal your funds.
But you do need at least one of these swap providers to be online to interact with LN.