@ArtGuy313578051 The founding fathers allowed slavery to happen for the sake of compromise.
You are willing to allow socialism for the sake of compromise.
You are perfectly mimicking the founding fathers biggest mistake.
@makc3d@Zerotwtx Not true unless the ligaments or tendons were fully severed. Muscles are meant to function even if other muscle fibers in the group are damaged. If this were true the slightest injuries could potentially paralyze us.
@RandianLenninst@UltraRik2 Fundamentally there's no reason, covenant communities are just the same thing but voluntary and with proper contracts.
As they exist, their contracts are structured invalidly and many of them are involuntary if not outright dictatorial.
@NikaHoshin This is the difference between ignorance and willful evasion.
Those who are ignorant ought to be educated at least once on the correct position, those who evade ought to be ignored, humiliated, or coldly refuted.
Please abandon being a sex communist. Women are not going to solve your problems in life, it takes a very specific special kind of woman to do that and I guarantee no system of redistribution will give you that. If anything it will only take it away by destroying the values of the women involved.
@ineluctone@alphatrex4410@rationalpeace1@anarchoboognish Dawg what? No, men are not predetermined to rape given an arbitrary amount of time sexless. This is the first time I've had to countersignal someone for being this wacko.
@alphatrex4410@rationalpeace1@anarchoboognish And the most rational way to fix dying from a lack of money is to steal money from others, who assumingly would also die from a lack of money, rather than simply be productive? In the first place, you literally cannot sustain yourself on pure theft alone, here's why.->
Crime contributes to poverty, not the other way around. Why do you think these crime ridden areas only get poorer and poorer? Even if a person becomes temporarily wealthy due to crime, they completely destroy the values of everyone around them by doing so. Their illgotten gains, which were only worth something in a societal trade context, are eventually worthless if they keep their behavior up and refuse to be productive.
1. No, we don't all agree on what causes poverty, unless you are an objectivist or have close alignment to the objectivist position.
2. It can be both an issue of merit or nuance depending on the context. I hold that the person you love is a reflection of most of or all your values. If you cannot find a relationship, your values are either contradictory, or no one around you shares your values. Basically, it could be both your failure, or the failures of others you interact with. It's not a dichotomy.
3. What would a systemic lack of sex even look like? Even the most prude Christian medival societies begrudgingly had sexual traditions.
@over4ayanocels This is what i imagine their doing to warrant that response because ive been in a woman in male dominated spaces most of my life and usually they dont give a flying fuck
there's this myth that men have to always be okay with women entering their spaces AND concede everything they enjoy about it to accommodate said women's arrival
@supersilly64 This is not "male dominated spaces" this is degenerates on social media, typically reddit or discord. Simply find a male dominated space that isn't polluted with degenerates, I'm literally in one right now, with girls in it. Not a single thing on this list has happened.
Socialists will impoverish you, tear down every structure you can use to succeed, and then use your poverty as evidence that we need yet more socialism.