@RangeProb Naive people pay you like you discovered some magic bullet. Sad. There is no edge in those peopleโs hands as they are at your mercy to even share anything for subscription fee๐๐ you are as crooked as those prop firms
@RangeProb Sure. Can anyone tell how it works then? ๐ or they just follow signals and they have no idea why xyz is this % probability? If it is so good, why sell it?
@ProbableChris@greenbirdtrader there is no more data on your website, what are you even talking about? ๐ ๐ ๐ both cover 10 years, old is 2014-2024, new is 2016-2026.
@ProbableChris@greenbirdtrader both data samples refer to 10 years, there is no more data as you said, so stop lying. Last year you posted such data,also 10 years, and it is also avialable via lookback which stated in each hour as ''high'', so according to you it is at least 75%.
@ProbableChris@greenbirdtrader which is still wayyyyyyyyyy below compared to the table you posted with 87% + :) 60%+ does not meet criteria of ''high'' anyways. what a weirdo
@ProbableChris@greenbirdtrader you can't even collect the data properly yourself. both claiming 10 years of data for the same type of a setup, which one is it Christina? coming here and ''teaching'' people ''the right way'' is an utter joke. do better
@ProbableChris@greenbirdtrader I remember from last year when you came to X, those stats were ranging from 87% to 94% in 20 min segment, literally in the same type of a table. ๐๐๐ sit down